Re: su2 in debian

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Mauro Darida wrote: > W: su2: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/compute_polar.py I guess this software is different to all other software out there and that you should discuss with upstream how to get the normal Debian filesystem layout. > I have also one

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.3-1

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Ben Wiederhake wrote: > - flawfinder yields too many results to be practical (~ 2460 lines). This is > mostly due to libtgl being written in a style that uses static arrays for > everything, including parsing and output. I've been thinking of making the default

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: Some small review. (I did not perform a copyright check and did not build the package) - Please do not introduce a dbg package -- they are now automatically generated. (The long description would be anyway confusing: "provides

Bug#807099: marked as done (RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A Theme Hospital engine reimplementation.)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:34:22 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A Theme Hospital engine reimplementation. has caused the Debian Bug report #807099, regarding RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A

Bug#809272: RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 ITP

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:51:01PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > * please consider handing a spellchecked to upstream, looks like there > > are some typos > > Fix spelling in comments or disabled and not-installed tests? Are you sure? just try runnning `codespell --quiet-level=3`... and

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.3-1

- flawfinder yields too many results to be practical (~ 2460 lines). This is mostly due to libtgl being written in a style that uses static arrays for everything, including parsing and output. I've been thinking of making the default for c-a-t-t to limit output of checks by default, probably to

Bug#794478: marked as done (RFS: imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 [Security][RC])

Your message dated Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:34:22 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 [Security][RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #794478, regarding RFS: imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 [Security][RC] to be marked

Re: Request for review: btfs

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:11:32PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > If anyone sponsor has some free time, please review my package uploaded > to mentors: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/btfs it's a simple package, so this has been quick to do: * d/copyright: you have a supurious '<' in

Bug#810008: RFS: arrayfire/3.2.2+dfsg1-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire" * Package name: arrayfire Version : 3.2.2+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : http://arrayfire.com/ * License :

Bug#809272: RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 ITP

> This package is quite cool already, just two bits: > > * Vcs-* points to github, which 404 (same as the other, I guess) Yes. Fixed > * please consider handing a spellchecked to upstream, looks like there > are some typos Fix spelling in comments or disabled and not-installed tests? Are you

Bug#810012: RFS: averell/1.2.4-1 ITP 773793

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "averell" Package name: averell Version : 1.2.4-1 Upstream Author : Jean Parpaillon URL : https://github.com/jeanparpaillon/averell License : Apache 2 Section

Re: Failed to stop defining RPATH in libncl

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:19:42PM +, Wookey wrote: > +++ Andreas Tille [2016-01-04 16:19 +0100]: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:07:40PM +, Wookey wrote: > > > > E: ncl-tools: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/NCLconverter > > > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/n> > The brute force way to

Bug#809272: RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 ITP

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: retitle -1 RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 04:29:54PM -0500, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > * New upstream release > * Update watch file to use pypi.debian.net > * Disable tests, since they need network > * Disable installation of test modules and

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.4-1 [ITP]

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "telegram-purple" * Package name: telegram-purple Version : 1.2.4-2 Upstream Author : Matthias Jentsch * URL : https://github.com/majn/telegram-purple * License : GPL2+

Bug#809272: RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 ITP

* Mattia Rizzolo [2016-01-05 16:34:13+] > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:51:01PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > * please consider handing a spellchecked to upstream, looks like there > > > are some typos > > > > Fix spelling in comments or disabled and not-installed

Bug#807099: closed by Bart Martens <ba...@quantz.debian.org> (closing RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A Theme Hospital engine reimplementation.)

Le mardi 5 janvier 2016 16:36:57, vous avez écrit : > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > #807099: RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A Theme Hospital engine > reimplementation. > > It has been closed by

Bug#807099: closed by Bart Martens <ba...@quantz.debian.org> (closing RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A Theme Hospital engine reimplementation.)

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:11:40PM +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > My original plan was to close the RFS automatically via the changelog. > > Maybe that was not hte right way to do it ;-) yes, usually RFS bugs are closed as soon as the package is uploaded (or there is a script that runs every

Re: Request for review: btfs

Hi Mattia On 05/01/2016 15:55, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > it's a simple package, so this has been quick to do: > > * d/copyright: you have a supurious '<' in the GPL-3+ name: 'GPL-3+<' > * d/rules: you don't need to manually export the buildflags in compat > level 9, so lines 3,4,5 can just go >

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place. > > > I know where

Bug#807099: closed by Bart Martens <ba...@quantz.debian.org> (closing RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087 - A Theme Hospital engine reimplementation.)

Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2016, 20:11 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > Le mardi 5 janvier 2016 16:36:57, vous avez écrit : > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > > > #807099: RFS: corsix-th/0.50-1 ITP 610087

Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. Thanks! > > - Please do not introduce a dbg package -- they are now automatically > generated. That came out since my

Bug#805632: RFS: plowshare/2.1.2-1

Hi Jakub, Paul, Sorry for the long delay. I've had a chance to investigate now and realised that the issue was that I was using the wrong workflow for git-buildpackage and so it was simply ignoring the tarball from uscan. I've fixed things now so that the orig tarball matched the downloaded one,

Bug#805632: RFS: plowshare/2.1.2-1

I forgot to reply to the question about forwarding 791467. I discussed it with upstream and they weren't interested in disabling javascript or really investigating the issue at all. As far as they're concerned, the security risk is totally acceptable, which is fair enough. Note that Vincent

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.3-1

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Ben Wiederhake wrote: > How about an option that changes the following: > - Current: thousands of warning for French, because the French dict is > missing. > - Suggested: single warning, saying "French dictionary not found (expected > at /usr/share/some/where)" > >

Request for review: btfs

Hi! If anyone sponsor has some free time, please review my package uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/btfs You can also contact me on IRC as highvoltage. thanks! -Jonathan