Bug#810107: marked as done (RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 7 Jan 2016 23:58:57 + with message-id <20160107235857.gd28...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#810107: RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #810107, regarding RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#810291: RFS: emacs-async/1.6-1 [ITP] -- simple library for asynchronous processing in Emacs

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package emacs-async. * Package name: emacs-async Version : 1.6 Upstream Author : John Wiegley * URL : https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async *

Bug#810293: RFS: perspective-el/1.12-1 [ITP] -- tagged workspaces in Emacs

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package perspective-el. * Package name: perspective-el Version : 1.12 Upstream Author : Natalie Weizenbaum * URL :

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi Gianfranco, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >The main reason why I haven't uploaded it as QA upload already is that > >wicd-curses is slightly broken since 1.7.3. This likely requires > >patching upstream code to get it fixed. See the TODO at >

Re: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > being a new maintainer doesn't stop you from trying to adopt a > package, specially because you need a sponsor to see your changes > propagated, so don't worry, somebody will double check your work! I also would be happy if wicd would be back in shape in

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Robert, (btw, please configure your MTA to wrap your mails) On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay wrote: > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? >  >The non vendor specific parts of it, you

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

On 07/01/2016 01:55, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote: > Hi Eriberto > > On 07/01/2016 01:28, Eriberto Mota wrote: >> Other datail is that is a good idea upload the first version to >> experimental to see how to the library will build. So you will able to >> can fix the issues (if necessary)

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

Hi, >Updated package is at http://mentors.debian.net/package/kpmcore am I wrong or I failed to see an RFS bug? or do you already have a sponsor? sorry but without a bug is difficult to keep track of packages needing a sponsor cheers, G.

Re: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi, >I'd like to maintain the wicd package, especially because it's a kind of >popular package. That would offer me a great challenge to master. But i >assume, I'll certainly make errors and certainly be very slow at the >beginning in comparison with an experienced maintainer. > >I can't

Bug#809727: marked as done (RFS: hwb/1:040412-7)

Your message dated Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:13:50 + with message-id <20160107151350.gb22...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #809727, regarding RFS: hwb/1:040412-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:23:34PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On 03/01/16 13:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > 43: override_dh_auto_install: > > 44: dh_auto_install > > 45: dh_install > > > > instead please override only dh_install, no need to override > > dh_auto_install. > >

Bug#809694: RFS: lwatch/0.6.2-1ubuntu1

control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 07:26:37AM +0800, Charlie WONG wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lwatch" [...] > Changes since the last upload: > -- No changes has made to this package since the last upload, expect the > maintainer. No. You shouldn't just

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

On Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:13:50 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hwb" > > uploaded, Thanks! > as a full source+binary upload, since I don't see the magic > line to get non-free

Bug#807781: marked as done (RFS: git-remote-gcrypt/0.20130908-8 [ITA] -- encrypted git repositories)

Your message dated Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:13:36 + with message-id <20160107181336.ga20...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#807781: RFS: git-remote-gcrypt/0.20130908-8 [ITA] -- encrypted git repositories has caused the Debian Bug report #807781, regarding RFS:

Re: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

+++ toogley [2016-01-07 19:49 +0100]: > Hey, > > honestly thanks a lot for the friendly support. Especially Axel, thanks for > offer to sponsor me. I hope, I won't disappoint you. I'm happy to help too. I use wicd all the time so want to see it in good shape. I can help with testing, packaging

Re: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi, toogley wrote: > Additionally I've set up the github repo > https://github.com/toogley/pkg-wicd - but i didn't make any changes > yet. You should also push at least the "upstream" and preferably also the "pristine-tar" branch to your repo. At least these are the three branches which the

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

[umh.. can you please teach your MUA to split the lines at a rasonable lenght?] On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:13:50 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > as a full source+binary upload, since I don't see the magic > > line to get