Re: boost : no match for call to boost::factory

This issue seems fixable by binding "::boost::factory" like that : objectTestFactory.addFactory("ObjectTest", *std::bind(* ::boost::factory()*)*); instead of : objectTestFactory.addFactory("DerivedObjectTest", ::boost::factory()); Thanks for your attention, Corentin 2016-01-13 15:38

Bug#810950: marked as done (RFS: ecere-sdk/0.44.14-1 -- Please sponsor this bug fix release to the Ecere SDK)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:45:48 + with message-id <1452768348.3165153.491881722.1c978...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #810950, regarding RFS: ecere-sdk/0.44.14-1 -- Please sponsor this bug fix release to the Ecere SDK to be

Re: use of deleted function boost::detail::stored_edge_property

Hello Corentin, the problem is that the class boost::detail::stored_edge_property<...> has the copy constructor deleted, because the default is a move constructor and no copy constructor is implemented (this is something new with C++11 and g++-5) As a result the instance of the class can

use of deleted function boost::detail::stored_edge_property

Dear mentors, I'm still trying to package the new upstream release of FW4SPL for the debian-med project. I get a new error, and I wish have your opinion about it : /usr/include/c++/5/bits/vector.tcc:563:7: required from ‘void > std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_default_append(std::vector<_Tp, >

Re: use of deleted function boost::detail::stored_edge_property

Hi does this helps? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25395805/compile-error-with-boost-graph-1-56-0-and-g-4-6-4 cheers, G. Il Giovedì 14 Gennaio 2016 12:32, Corentin Desfarges ha scritto: Dear mentors, I'm still trying to package the new upstream

Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.

Hi, please check the new version. I fixed a couple of things, but the remaining ones got me... 2016-01-13 15:22 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > 2) > hardening-wrapper can just go away, the package builds fine anyway. > The canonical way to have hardening buildflags is to export

Re: use of deleted function boost::detail::stored_edge_property

Hi Gert, > ... provides many code path for the copy and move operations, and before > C++11 an explicit copy constructor is given that implements a move-like > logic. > I'm not sure how to resolve this compile problem, you could try to > disable c++11 by compiling with -std=c++03. Sadly, the

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

* Eriberto , 2016-01-06, 22:36: export PVER=$(shell dpkg-parsechangelog --show-field version | cut -d"-" -f1) %: dh $@ override_dh_makeshlibs: dh_makeshlibs -- -v$(PVER) No, please don't do this. IMO, it is right and works fine. What is the

help with glances package

Hi Mentors I am working in adopt glances package, This package content prebuilt javascript object[1] and other lintian warnings, I tried fix this, overwriting that javascript objects from d/rules and make symbol links to the proper js packages in Debian, but doesnt work :( ¿Could you someone

Re: help with glances package

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Daniel Echeverry wrote: > I am working in adopt glances package, This package content prebuilt > javascript object[1] and other lintian warnings, I tried fix this, > overwriting that javascript objects from d/rules and make symbol > links to the proper js

Bug#811015: RFS: clfft/2.10.0-1~exp1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clfft" * Package name: clfft Version : 2.10.0-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clFFT * License

Bug#811016: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.10-1~exp1)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:50:44 + (UTC) with message-id <1503892269.8516843.1452804644475.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#811016: RFS: clblas/2.10-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #811016, regarding RFS: clblas/2.10-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#809642: sponsorship-requests: RFS: digikam/4:4.14.0-1.1~bpo8+1 [NMU]

Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016, 15:23:30 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Hi, > I did a dch --bpo and uploaded on debomatic > > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#jessie-backports/digikam/4.14 > .0-3~bpo8+1/buildlog > > Matthias, does it work for you? I can upload it on backports if

Bug#809642: marked as done (RFS: digikam/4:4.14.0-1.1~bpo8+1 [NMU])

Your message dated Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:52:32 + (UTC) with message-id <1941461241.8438672.1452804752615.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#809642: sponsorship-requests: RFS: digikam/4:4.14.0-1.1~bpo8+1 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #809642, regarding RFS:

Bug#811015: marked as done (RFS: clfft/2.10.0-1~exp1)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:00:41 + (UTC) with message-id <1941514702.8493748.1452805241338.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#811015: RFS: clfft/2.10.0-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #811015, regarding RFS: clfft/2.10.0-1~exp1 to be marked as done.

Bug#811016: RFS: clblas/2.10-1~exp1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas" * Package name: clblas Version : 2.10-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS * License

Re: use of deleted function boost::detail::stored_edge_property

Hello Corentin, On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 15:01 +0100, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > > Sadly, the framework FW4SPL has been designed to be compiled with > c++11... Another option to force the use of an older implementation code path could be to set one of the defines