Bug#811073: RFS: lbfgsb/3.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lbfgsb" * Package name: lbfgsb Version : 3.0-1 Upstream Author : Ciyou Zhu, Richard Byrd, Jorge Nocedal and Jose Luis Morales * URL :

Bug#804298: marked as done (RFS: homer/0.26.0~svn3080-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:59:06 +0100 with message-id <5699093a.4030...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#804298: RFS: hello/1.0-1 [ITP] -- homer has caused the Debian Bug report #804298, regarding RFS: homer/0.26.0~svn3080-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#787148: marked as done (RFS: gambatte/0.5.0+git20150322-1 [ITP] -- Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:58:28 +0100 with message-id <56990914.1090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#787148: gambatte review has caused the Debian Bug report #787148, regarding RFS: gambatte/0.5.0+git20150322-1 [ITP] -- Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator to be marked as

Bug#807700: marked as done (RFS: steamcmd - Command-line interface for Steam)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:03:32 +0100 with message-id <56990a44.6050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RE: RFS: steamcmd - Command-line interface for Steam has caused the Debian Bug report #807700, regarding RFS: steamcmd - Command-line interface for Steam to be marked as done.

Bug#782074: RFS: ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Sean, BTW I removed the lintian-override on the debian directory. lintian is wrong in this case, so there is no need to override it. (wrong because it doesn't know if the link will be satisfied in a package that is a dependency) cheers,

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:21 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for our team's package - MooseFS I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think it needs much more work before it could be uploaded (let alone my objections against

Bug#802703: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 control: noowner -1 thanks Removing myself as owner, there has been no reaction on the bug report since months. Please reopen if anything changes. cheers, G. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Bug#802703: marked as done (RFS: cvars/2.6.0 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:57:27 +0100 with message-id <569908d7.3000...@debian.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #802703, regarding RFS: cvars/2.6.0 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

To override or not to override?

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-01-15, 15:55: lintian is wrong in this case, so there is no need to override it. Um, no; on the contrary, Lintian being wrong is the only legitimate reason to add an override. Here's how one should deal with Lintian tags: if my

Bug#782074: marked as done (RFS: ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:40:56 +0100 with message-id <569904f8.60...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker has caused the Debian Bug report #782074, regarding RFS:

Bug#801237: mactel-boot review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: noowner -1 Unsetting myself from owners, this way somebody might pick it up. cheers, Gianfranco On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:40:26 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256

Bug#797888: marked as done (RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:00:51 +0100 with message-id <569909a3.3000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK has caused the Debian Bug report #797888, regarding RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

Bug#804433: marked as done (RFS: publib/0.40-2 [ITA])

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:26:11 +0100 with message-id <56990f93.70...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#804433: RFS: publib/0.40-2 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #804433, regarding RFS: publib/0.40-2 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#799813: marked as done (RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES emulator)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:11 +0100 with message-id <56990aa7.3000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#799813: RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES emulator has caused the Debian Bug report #799813, regarding RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES emulator to be marked as

Bug#802797: marked as done (RFS: ultraeasy/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Third party driver for Lifescan OneTouch UltraEasy blood glucose monitor)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:07:59 +0100 with message-id <56990b4f.3060...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: ultraeasy/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Third party driver for Lifescan OneTouch UltraEasy blood glucose monitor has caused the Debian Bug report #802797, regarding RFS: ultraeasy/1.0-1

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:52:17 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > Of course I think MooseFS is better, I'd much appreciate if you could elaborate on details how MooseFS is better. I could not find anything to support that claim. > Apart this I don't think, that LizardFS maintainer would "replace"

Bug#801197: marked as done (RFS: smplayer-themes/1:15.12.0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:38:33 +0100 with message-id <56991279.1050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#801197: RFS: smplayer-themes/1:15.6.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #801197, regarding RFS: smplayer-themes/1:15.12.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: RFS: ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

Hi, >Thank you for taking the time to review my packaging :) I did already review the ublock package, this one was somewhat a similar package ;) >What positive feedback did you get? I didn't see any other comments on >the bug report nor the pkg-mozext-maintainers list. it was a private

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi, >my first commit: >https://github.com/toogley/pkg-wicd/commit/4ade5ad71c1c50be9cd3748742042ff34a428fb1 >why do you say the "main development" is done in master, and not in >stretch, as stretch is merged into stable after a while? no, master is usually what is uploaded in unstable. After

Re: To override or not to override?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:29:07PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-01-15, 15:55: > >lintian is wrong in this case, so there is no need to override it. > > Um, no; on the contrary, Lintian being wrong is the only legitimate reason > to add an

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi Toogley, toogley wrote: > my first commit: > https://github.com/toogley/pkg-wicd/commit/4ade5ad71c1c50be9cd3748742042ff34a428fb1 Yay. It though shows that some things are not yet clear. Let me try to explain them: All files under debian/patches/ (except "series") are for patching upstream

Bug#801198: marked as done (RFS: smplayer/15.11.0~ds0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:51:25 +0100 with message-id <5699157d.2020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#801197: RFS: smplayer-themes/1:15.6.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #801198, regarding RFS: smplayer/15.11.0~ds0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#805528: marked as done (RFS: xtrkcad/1:4.2.2-1)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:51:33 +0100 with message-id <56991585.1040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#805528: RFS: xtrkcad/1:4.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #805528, regarding RFS: xtrkcad/1:4.2.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#802902: RFS: vconnectstand/2.0.1 ITP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I still fail to see the update on mentors. https://mentors.debian.net/package/vconnectstand cheers, Gianfranco On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:33:23 +0100 Tobias Platen wrote: > > > On 06.11.2015 15:44, Gianfranco

Re: RFS: ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

Hello, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:40:56PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Built after I got accepted on the Debian Mozilla > Extension Maintainers. Thank you for taking the time to review my packaging :) > I got a positive feedback about the packaging, and I did some > successful testing

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hey, my first commit: https://github.com/toogley/pkg-wicd/commit/4ade5ad71c1c50be9cd3748742042ff34a428fb1 ==> Can you give me feedback, please? :) why do you say the "main development" is done in master, and not in stretch, as stretch is merged into stable after a while? ==> we would then

Bug#784898: marked as done (RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP] -- Tools for deduping file systems)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:05:38 +0100 with message-id <569934f2.5050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#784898: I would be interested has caused the Debian Bug report #784898, regarding RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP] -- Tools for deduping file systems to be marked as done. This

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

oh, i've just overlooked that part of your explanation regarding the master/sid branch... On 01/15/2016 07:33 PM, toogley wrote: Hi Gianfranco, Hi Axel, So, the master branch represents sid in the wicd repo? sry for the missunderstanding^^ > since you changed something in debian

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

On 01/15/2016 08:00 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: orig tarball doesn't have the same source anymore, Could you please explain that?

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

> orig tarball doesn't have the same source anymore, Could you please explain that? the source tree has the same content has the orig.tar.gz tarball. if you commit a change outside the debian directory), the content changes simple as this. So, you can commit only changes in debian

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi Gianfranco, Hi Axel, So, the master branch represents sid in the wicd repo? sry for the missunderstanding^^ > since you changed something in debian directory, you can just commit > and live happy. What do you mean by that? I mean, if i revert/correct my changes with another commit,

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi, >oh, i've just overlooked that part of your explanation regarding the >master/sid branch... lol wonderful! > What do you mean by that? I mean, if i revert/correct my changes with > another commit, doesn't that lead to a confusing git history, as my > commit was not correct? everybody

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

On 01/15/2016 06:20 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: (look e.g. to virtualbox-ext-package source package, where I run debconf-updatepo in clean target, just to avoid such situations :) ) What file/commit/whatever are you referring to? I couldn't found sth related in your git logs.

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi >But i haven't commited in the source directory, just in the debian one? true! cheers, G.

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

On 01/15/2016 08:00 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: The main issue is when you commit something in the source directory, then the orig tarball doesn't have the same source anymore, and you have dpkg-buildpackage fail because of modified source. But i haven't commited in the source

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi, toogley wrote: > running "git buildpackage --git-debian-branch=master" in the branch > master results in "gbp:error: upstream/1.7.3 is not a valid treeish" > which doesn't make sense to me, as we obviously have a debian dir in > the master branch. (I'm refering to >

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

On 01/15/2016 08:21 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: (look e.g. to virtualbox-ext-package source package, where I run debconf-updatepo in clean target, just to avoid such situations :) ) What file/commit/whatever are you referring to? I couldn't found sth related in your git logs. I mean

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

On 01/15/2016 10:36 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: Only one small thing to nitpick: Usually the changelog items are added at the bottom of the current entry. They may be grouped by contributor, though, i.e. adding new items at the end of your item group as you did here:

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi again, toogley wrote: > On 01/15/2016 10:36 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: > >Only one small thing to nitpick: Usually the changelog items are added > >at the bottom of the current entry. They may be grouped by > >contributor, though, i.e. adding new items at the end of your item > >group as you did

Re: Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:44:16 PM Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 12, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > > If you loose Master Server, user action is needed: he can run another > > Master Server e.g. basing on medatada collected on Metalogger (sometadata > > is *not* lost) or

Re: Bug#810822: ITP: MooseFS

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 04:27:06 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > We're already publishing own packages repository > (https://moosefs.com/download/ubuntudebian.html > ). We would like to make > MooseFS available directly in Debian! :) In November 2014

Bug#811140: RFS: y-u-no-validate/2013052401-5 [ITA] -- browser extension to make security exceptions temporary by default

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my adoption of y-u-no-validate. y-u-no-validate is an Iceweasel extension that makes the "Permanently store this exception" checkbox in the "Add Security Exception" dialog unchecked by default. *

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

Hi >Can you please explain why you used dh_clean and not dh_build or sth >similar? i mean, is there a specific reason? acually the updatepo is something that needs to be done and committed on git. during in dh-clean ensures you will run it from time to time (at least to create a

Re: To override or not to override?

Paul Tagliamonte writes: > I don't like having overrides sit around, and having them sit around > while the version of lintian that's being used is no longer triggering > makes me feel unfomfortable This is why Lintian will warn you about unused overrides so that you can