Bug#801262: RFS: ppsspp/1.1.1-1 [ITP] -- A portable PSP emulator

PPSSPP is again in mentors, version 1.2.2. I'm not sure yet what happened to fonts-droid package. If fonts-droid-fallback is the substitute, where's DroidSansJapanese.ttf for example? Also, anyone knows what package has NotoSansThai-Regular.ttf now? cheers, sergio-br2 On Wed, 6 Apr 2016

Packaging mmh (fork of nmh)

[CC nmh maintainer] Hello! I am packaging mmh (http://marmaro.de/prog/mmh), which is fork of nmh. Both of them are mail user agents. nmh installs it's binaries (~20) into /usr/bin/nmh. Now I try to do the same, and install mmh's binaries into /usr/bin/mmh, but Lintian complain about FHS

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

Herbert Elwood Gilliland III writes: > Finally, I just wanted to say Herbert, email correspondence is an important part of being a Debian package maintainer. Please take the time to compose messages with consideration to the recipients. In particular: * Post your

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

Finally, I just wanted to say that it does seem to show that i don't need a sponsor, is that because someone sponsored it or did I do something wrong? TIA -h On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III < herb.gillil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > Your upload of the package

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

Hi. Your upload of the package 'fed' to mentors.debian.net was successful. Others can now see it. The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fed The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fed/fed_0.95a-1.dsc If you do not yet have a

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

Index of / Name Size Date Modified dislocker-dbgsym_0.6.1-1_amd64.deb 20.1 kB 4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM dislocker_0.6.1-1.debian.tar.xz 7.4 kB 4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM dislocker_0.6.1-1.dsc

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

Ok I bumped the version by .01 and re-uploaded now that my key is in keys.gnupg.net Said it was uploaded successfuly, but still doesn't appear Is it because my GPG email is not exactly like my mentors account? Otherwise, I feel like I've got everything set up with gpg.. sorry this is such a

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

[19:50:36 main]$ gpg --search-keys DE8473B0 gpg: searching for "DE8473B0" from hkp server keys.gnupg.net (1) Herb Gilliland (fed author) 2048 bit RSA key 76860CC4ADB94766DAAD5EB6AA74DF0CDE8473B0, created: 2016-04-05 Keys 1-1 of 1 for "DE8473B0". Enter

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

[19:33:00 main]$ gpg --send-keys DE8473B0 gpg: sending key DE8473B0 to hkp server keys.gnupg.net [19:38:31 main]$ gpg --refresh-keys gpg: refreshing 1 key from hkp://keys.gnupg.net gpg: requesting key DE8473B0 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net gpgkeys: key 76860CC4ADB94766DAAD5EB6AA74DF0CDE8473B0

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

Ok I sent the gpg key to the keys.gnupg.net server Now what? On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III < herb.gillil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that "roadfighter' uploaded correctly. Any hints on what i'm doing > wrong for "fed"? > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Herbert

Bug#820544:

Stupid me, forgot to link to package :) https://mentors.debian.net/package/vifm

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

On 8 April 2016 at 17:43, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Given that both of these will be broken if this package isn't >>uploaded, is now the time to upload it? > > I didn't understand this sentence. It turns out debian-cd can list both btrfs-tools and btrfs-progs

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

I see that "roadfighter' uploaded correctly. Any hints on what i'm doing wrong for "fed"? On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III < herb.gillil...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Change GPG key* > Current GPG key: 2048R/DE8473B0 > Delete current key: > GPG key: > Please use the output

Bug#807432: python-jellyfish_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

https://packages.debian.org/sid/python3-jellyfishoops so you have to rename/move it. cheers, G. Il Sabato 9 Aprile 2016 20:20, Debian FTP Masters ha scritto: Version check failed: Your upload included the binary package python3-jellyfish, version 0.5.3-1,

Bug#816192: RFS: proselint/0.3.5-1 [ITP] -- A prose linter

another issue proselint -t Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/proselint", line 9, in load_entry_point('proselint==0.5.3', 'console_scripts', 'proselint')() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 716, in __call__ return self.main(*args, **kwargs) File

Bug#820544: RFS: vifm/0.8.1a-0.1 [NMU] -- flexible vi-like file manager using ncurses

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "vifm": * Package name: vifm Version : 0.8.1a-0.1 Upstream Author : xaizek * URL : http://vifm.info/ * License : GPL-2+

Bug#816192: marked as done (RFS: proselint/0.3.5-1 [ITP] -- A prose linter)

Your message dated Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:03:50 + (UTC) with message-id <1554413531.3400878.1460225030310.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#816192: RFS: proselint/0.3.5-1 [ITP] -- A prose linter has caused the Debian Bug report #816192, regarding RFS: proselint/0.3.5-1 [ITP]

Bug#807432: marked as done (RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.3-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 9 Apr 2016 17:45:11 + (UTC) with message-id <1999355180.3462797.1460223911269.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#807432: RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #807432, regarding RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.3-1 [ITP] to

Bug#820196: marked as done (RFS: dante/1.4.1+dfsg-1 -- new upstream version, packaging updates)

Your message dated Sat, 9 Apr 2016 17:32:12 + (UTC) with message-id <469040050.3491785.1460223132215.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820196: RFS: dante/1.4.1+dfsg-1 -- new upstream version, packaging updates has caused the Debian Bug report #820196, regarding RFS:

Bug#820539: RFS: libretro-desmume [ITP]

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, > https://mentors.debian.net/package/libretro-desmume licenses are missing e.g. some Expat desmume/src/emufile.* desmume/src/arm_jit.h: GPL (v3 or later) desmume/src/instruction_attributes.h: GPL (v3 or later)

Re: Any reason to keep libsdsl in experimental (Was: Please help creating shared *and* static library with cmake)

Hi Tomasz, On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > the only reason is that it doesn't build on most architectures. The > upstream devel version build, I think, on other archs, but it hasn't > been released yet. I've asked the upstream author to release a new >

Bug#820539: RFS: libretro-desmume [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hey dear mentors! I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-desmume" This is the libretro port of DeSmuME, the Nintendo DS emulator. It's a fork of the original project to fit better with the libretro API, so it's not possible to use

Re: Any reason to keep libsdsl in experimental (Was: Please help creating shared *and* static library with cmake)

On 08/04/16 19:24, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:16:51PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > For the record, I seem to remember there is already a libsdsl package in > > experimental: > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libsdsl.html > > Ahhh, very helpful hint!! > >