Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

2016-05-02 Thread lumin
Hi mentors, I found the way to fix lintianI: no-fortify-functions, and I'll add multi-arch support as suggested by Aron, so please wait for my next upload.

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

2016-05-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 20:49 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > ... Great! > I see. Unfortunately the copy of this file that upstream ships does > not include a license; however a newer version does. > I have excluded the old version from 1.7.6 using d/copyright's Files- > Excluded, and then

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

2016-05-02 Thread lumin
Hi mentors, I've fixed the issues you pointed out. New packages are rebuilt locally, and uploaded to mentors. https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe Debomatic-amd64 is still building this updated package: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1/buildlog

Bug#823284: RFS: gap-scscp/2.1.4+ds-2 [REFRESHMENT] - SCSCP protocol in GAP

2016-05-02 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsors, I am looking for a sponsor for the Debian package gap-scscp [1]. This package is merely a refresh version. GAP is a Computer Algebra System (CAS), SCSCP is a protocol for communication between CAS.

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-05-02 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> >I do not want to put a pressure on anyone, but if it is the only way > >to make big changes to package, let's do it. > I could understand that, but > 1) lets avoid experimental features > 2) lets try to keep changes minimal. Okay, I can agree that compat 10 is unnecessery. But still someone

Bug#823277: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1~bpo8+1

2016-05-02 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my backport of "btrfs-progs" Package name: btrfs-progs Version: 4.4.1-1.1~bpo8+1 Section: admin It builds these binary packages: btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

2016-05-02 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Jakub, > The syntax is: > > .so foobar.1 > > Note that dh_installman replaces manpages that contain only a .so with > symlinks; so alternatively you could make the symlink yourself. Excellent, I will do this then. Many thanks for the quick help! Cheers Sascha

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

2016-05-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Wise , 2016-05-02, 14:31: I can't find the syntax right now, but there is a way for manual pages to redirect from one to the other instead of duplicating them. The syntax is: .so foobar.1 Note that dh_installman replaces manpages that contain only a .so with

Bug#823270: RFS: csvjdbc/1.0.29-1

2016-05-02 Thread Christopher Hoskin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "csvjdbc" * Package name: csvjdbc Version : 1.0.29-1 Upstream Author : Mario Frasca , Simon Chenery ,

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

2016-05-02 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Paul thanks for the review. Let’s see what I can do. > These need to be fixed before I upload this: > >> This NEW upload closes RFP #818245. > > Any particular reason you haven't retitled it to ITP and set yourself > as the owner? Done. > Since this is a fork of part of the Python stdlib,

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2016-05-02 Thread Alexander Koenig
Hi there, the release is pretty dated; for sure I had no intentions to limit aseqjoy to strict GPL-V2 so you can consider aseqjoy-0.0.1 to be GPL-V2+. This applies to all copyrightable files, including the man page. Thanks, Alex

Bug#823263: RFS: ublock-origin/1.7.0+dfsg-1 -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

2016-05-02 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update to ublock-origin. * Package name: ublock-origin Version : 1.7.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Raymond Hill * URL : https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock * License :

Bug#823245: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2848-1

2016-05-02 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Mattia Rizzolo [2016-05-02 17:31 +]: > control: owner -1 > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:20:06PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > >

Bug#823250: RFS: sympow/1.023-6 [REFRESHMENT] - mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func

2016-05-02 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsors, I am looking for a sponsor for the Debian package sympow, a mathematical program which is part of Sage. This very package is mainly a refreshment. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1]

Bug#823249: RFS: camera.app/0.8.0-10 [RC] -- GNUstep application for digital still cameras

2016-05-02 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "camera.app" * Package name: camera.app Version : 0.8.0-10 Upstream Author : Stefan Kleine Stegemann * URL :

Bug#823245: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2848-1

2016-05-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: owner -1 control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:20:06PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/moc > > > Alternatively, one can download the package

Re: Mass-rebuilding packages

2016-05-02 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Paul Wise (2016-05-02 08:37:49) > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > Thanks for the responses, all. > > Another one is ratt (rebuild-all-the-things). > > I wonder if some of these should be merged together or removed. from this thread I gather that there are

Bug#823245: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2848-1

2016-05-02 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc" * Package name: moc Version : 1:2.6.0~svn-r2848-1 Upstream Author : John Fitzgerald * URL : http://moc.daper.net/ * License

Bug#823231: marked as done (RFS: clfft/2.12.0-1)

2016-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 14:47:47 + (UTC) with message-id <1137345907.9377923.1462200467949.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823231: RFS: clfft/2.12.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823231, regarding RFS: clfft/2.12.0-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#823231: RFS: clfft/2.12.0-1

2016-05-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clfft" * Package name: clfft Version : 2.12.0-1 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clFFT * License

Bug#823230: marked as done (RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160427-1)

2016-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 14:26:05 + (UTC) with message-id <171093032.9302965.1462199165635.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823230: RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160427-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823230, regarding RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160427-1 to

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-05-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi >I do not want to put a pressure on anyone, but if it is the only way >to make big changes to package, let's do it. I could understand that, but 1) lets avoid experimental features 2) lets try to keep changes minimal. I mean, a package refactor might be acceptable if the current packaging

Bug#823230: RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160427-1

2016-05-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-arrayfire" * Package name: python-arrayfire Version : 3.3.20160427-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire * URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-python *

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

2016-05-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Ghislain, thanks for the good review! I remember I looked at this package a while ago, so, if you (lumin) can fix what Ghislain pointed out, I'll be happy to do a new reivew and hopefully sponsor :) cheers, G. Il Lunedì 2 Maggio 2016 15:13,

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

2016-05-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 01/05/16 12:44, lumin wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org, deb...@danielstender.com, deb...@onerussian.com, debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe"

Re: Mass-rebuilding packages

2016-05-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Thanks for the responses, all. Another one is ratt (rebuild-all-the-things). I wonder if some of these should be merged together or removed. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

2016-05-02 Thread Paul Wise
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/icdiff/icdiff_1.7.3-1.dsc Here is a review: These need to be fixed