Bug#826063: RFS: libu2f-host/1.0.0-2 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F host communication library

control: tags -1 moreinfo On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:31:02AM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my upload for the libu2f-host package. > It fixes the following RC bug: > #820686: FTBFS

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:17 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > python-skimage should be RC free now (if no other RC bugs are opened of > course :) ) > > let me know when you have updates, > > G. Thank you for working on it ! :-)

Bug#826076: RFS: lua-cwrap/0~20160222-gdbd0a62-1 -- CWrap package for Torch Framework [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-cwrap" * Package name: lua-cwrap Version : 0~20160222-gdbd0a62-1 Upstream Author : Torch Developers * URL

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:32 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I don't agree. Regarding the testsuite, I believe most features should > be tested at package build time, including the Python stuff. We want to > fail early if something goes wrong. To me, the autopkgtest testsuite > serves a

Bug#826066: marked as done (RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-1 [RC] -- factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method)

Your message dated Thu, 2 Jun 2016 04:10:23 +0200 with message-id <20160602021023.ga5...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#826066: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-1 [RC] -- factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method has caused the Debian Bug report #826066, regarding RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-1 [RC] --

Bug#826066: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-1 [RC] -- factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the package gmp-ecm, a mathematical suite to factor integers. This very package brings a new micro

Bug#826063: RFS: libu2f-host/1.0.0-2 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F host communication library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my upload for the libu2f-host package. It fixes the following RC bug: #820686: FTBFS - missing build-dep libglib2.0-dev The package's maintainer team, the Debian Authentication Maintainers, has

Bug#826060: RFS: libu2f-server/1.0.1-1 [NMU] [RC] -- U2F server communication library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my upload for the libu2f-server package. It fixes the following RC bug: #820690: FTBFS - missing build-dep libglib2.0-dev The package's maintainer team, the Debian Authentication Maintainers, has

Bug#820704: Bug#820705: RFS: subuser/0.5.6-3 [ITP]

Hi, I follow your recommendations and push again new version : - Ajust debian/changelog - Modify debian/control and debian/rules Also for moment not include doc, WIP, discuss with developer because doc include mp4 video. Thx for your review :) --- Stanislas Leduc

Bug#820647: marked as done (RFS: libretro-gambatte [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:11:33 + (UTC) with message-id <799155274.5623590.1464819093873.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820647: RFS: libretro-gambatte [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #820647, regarding RFS: libretro-gambatte [ITP] to be marked as

Bug#826030: RFS: ntl/9.9.0-1 -- EXPERIMENTAL!

Hi, I uploaded the package on binnew queue. https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/libntl.git/commit/?id=abd150f5fd1b277b7f47fb27c9c958f49d06a7ba I changed unstable to experimental, next time please don't forget that :) (BTW please check reverse-depends for buildability, open

Bug#820647: RFS: libretro-gambatte [ITP]

Hi Sérgio, can you please check the above/below and report back? I can do another check/review when you fix it. thanks, G. Il Sabato 21 Maggio 2016 19:36, Andrey Rahmatullin ha scritto: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >From d/copyright, this is not distributable as it

Bug#825978: marked as done (RFS: libretro-bsnes-mercury [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:21:23 + (UTC) with message-id <658987151.5339866.1464805283523.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825978: RFS: libretro-bsnes-mercury [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #825978, regarding RFS: libretro-bsnes-mercury [ITP] to be

Bug#826030: marked as done (RFS: ntl/9.9.0-1 -- EXPERIMENTAL!)

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:20:11 + (UTC) with message-id <1245391015.1834212.1464805211350.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826030: RFS: ntl/9.9.0-1 -- EXPERIMENTAL! has caused the Debian Bug report #826030, regarding RFS: ntl/9.9.0-1 -- EXPERIMENTAL! to be

Bug#826030: RFS: ntl/9.9.0-1 -- EXPERIMENTAL!

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ntl" : * Package name: ntl Version : 9.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Victor Shoup * URL : http://www.shoup.net/ntl/ * License : GPL-2+ Section

Bug#824121: marked as done (RFS: python-nanomsg/1.0-2 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:26:07 + with message-id <20160601162605.gh16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review has caused the Debian Bug report #824121, regarding RFS: python-nanomsg/1.0-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#824104: RFS: gneural-network/0.9.1-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, as usual, I'm available for a new -science package, so I'll sponsor as soon as Ghislain is fine with the packaging. BTW I did a quick review, and it sounds fine to me I'm not sure about the multi-arch: foreign tag and about the lintian override: O: gneural-network:

Bug#825531: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP]

Dear G, Thanks for your guidance! It would be my debut on NEW queue. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, it is on its way for new queue :) > > > Just a nitpick. > Usually the -doc packages are suggested from other packages. > > So,

Re: Helping maintain debian packages

> I have created a debian package > https://packagecloud.io/waghanza/plunder/packages/debian/jessie/phantomjs_2.1.1_amd64.deb Phantomjs is good. But as I remember it, that upstream release contains some bundled library, and do not support linking with system one. About documentation, apt-get

Re: Helping maintain debian packages

Hi, do you want something like this? http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers G. Il Mercoledì 1 Giugno 2016 17:42, Marwan Rabbâa ha scritto: Hi, I have created a debian package https://packagecloud.io/waghanza/plunder/packages/debian/jessie/phantomjs_2.1.1_amd64.deb.

Re: Helping maintain debian packages

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:25:08PM +0200, Marwan Rabbâa wrote: > I have created a debian package > https://packagecloud.io/waghanza/plunder/packages/debian/jessie/phantomjs_2.1.1_amd64.deb > . > > I am not aware of debian policies. > > Could you give me some advice / documentation links to help

Bug#819406: RFS: capitan/1.0.3-dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Remake of the classic 80s platform game

Hi, yes please fix the libpng build failure and the embedded libraries and I'll have another look here some hints about how to fix that https://titanpad.com/libpng16-transistion BTW general note: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org pkg-games-devel

Helping maintain debian packages

Hi, I have created a debian package https://packagecloud.io/waghanza/plunder/packages/debian/jessie/phantomjs_2.1.1_amd64.deb . I am not aware of debian policies. Could you give me some advice / documentation links to help debian communities having phantomjs available ? Regards,

Bug#820704: RFS: subuser/0.5.6-3 [ITP]

Hi, >On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Stanislas Leduc wrote: >> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] >> * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] >> * License : [fill in] >Huh? well, this is fixed in #820705 :) Stanislas, please fix and ping

Bug#816968: RFS: broadcom-facetimehd/0.0.1~git20150229.1.8cc44d6 [ITP] -- DKMS driver for Broadcom PCIe cameras

really attaching it :) g. Il Mercoledì 1 Giugno 2016 17:27, Gianfranco Costamagna ha scritto: Hi, I don't know if Nobuhiro wants to sponsor or not. In case a little additional review: arch: all? I don't think it is good to try to build dkms during build. the

Bug#821151: marked as done (RFS: comitup/0.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:30:44 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#821151: RFS: comitup/0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #821151, regarding RFS: comitup/0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This

Bug#816968: RFS: broadcom-facetimehd/0.0.1~git20150229.1.8cc44d6 [ITP] -- DKMS driver for Broadcom PCIe cameras

Hi, I don't know if Nobuhiro wants to sponsor or not. In case a little additional review: arch: all? I don't think it is good to try to build dkms during build. the modules are useless anyway, and they have to be built during package installation (it might be good for an autopkgtestsuite).

Bug#820488: RFS: roadfighter/1.0.1269-1 [ITP] -- Drive a car in a death race

control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, please fix the above/below, and maybe think about using pkg-games-devel to maintain that package (and ping back once you fixed that) cheers, G. Il Lunedì 23 Maggio 2016 15:03, Adam Borowski ha scritto: On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:07:39AM

Bug#825531: marked as done (RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:14:08 + (UTC) with message-id <464794007.5195735.1464794048244.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825531: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #825531, regarding RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP] to be marked as

Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, I tried to build and run, and (I admit, I'm behind a proxy) it failed with an error like runescape mv: cannot stat 'jagexappletviewer.jar': No such file or directory Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged.

Bug#825531: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP]

Dear G, Really appreciate your review! On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > I can sponsor, just after some answers for the above. I go through your comments, and find you only have doubt on multiarch, others are all ack/resolved. So

Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 [ITP]

Hi again, >It's false positive. ack >> Replaces: shadowsocks (<< 1.5.3-2) >> Breaks: shadowsocks (<< 1.5.3-2) > >Thanks to co-maintainer Boyuan, below comments are from him. > > >Upstream used to use the package name **`shadowsocks'** long long ago, >and the name was changed into

Bug#825531: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP]

Hi, >It's false positive. ack >> 2) lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2016-05-31 21:37 ./usr/lib/libcork.so.15 >> -> libcork.so.16.0.1 >The SONAME (15) and version (16.0.1) are given by upstream. >I guess it's also for legacy reason, to be compatible with other system. >So better not change by

Bug#821270: Review of git version

Source: firefox-branding-iceweasel This package includes files under: * MPL-2.0 (which is compatible with GPL-2.0+ and LGPL-2.1+) * Triple licensing: MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.1+ or LGPL-2.1+ (compatible with the above) This is largely the same as just 'MPL-2.0' nord-stream On 06/01/2016 03:06 AM, Sean

Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 [ITP]

Dear G, Thank you for reviewing my package! Changes are push to branch pkg3 of github: https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev And package on mentors also get updated. (Only fixed the description issue, though) On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna

Bug#825531: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP]

Dear G, Thank you for reviewing my package! Changes are push to branch pkg2 of github: https://github.com/rogers0/libcork And package on mentors also get updated. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, I did a quick look and the package

Bug#825390: RFS: maldetect/1.5-1 [ITP] -- Linux Malware Detection

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > - you might consider using "GNU/Linux" instead of "Linux" in the package > description, since Debian identifies itself as a "GNU/Linux" > distribution Debian no longer identifies itself as "Debian GNU/Linux" but just "Debian", due to the