Bug#826661: RFS: groonga/6.0.4-1

Hi, Thank you for reviewing! > Hi, I did a debdiff between them, and I see some changes that might be ABI > breaking the library: > > -GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval_now(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv); > -GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval2str(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv, char *buf, > size_t buf_size);

Bug#821171: marked as done (RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #821171, regarding RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#819615: marked as done (RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool has caused the Debian Bug report #819615, regarding RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software

Bug#811426: marked as done (RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #811426, regarding RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked

Bug#791724: marked as done (RFS: w1retap/1.4.4-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: w1retap/1.4.4-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for 1-Wire weather sensors has caused the Debian Bug report #791724, regarding RFS: w1retap/1.4.4-1 [ITP] -- Data logger for

Bug#808249: marked as done (RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU])

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:23:46 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #808249, regarding RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Importing ubuntu package

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > What is common practice about adopting ubuntu packages? I want to > adopt ubuntu `btpd' package, but it already have it's changelog. I > think it would be impolite to just discard it. What is recommended way > to follow Debian policy and

Re: phonetisaurus in unstable

* Giulio Paci , 2016-06-08, 11:48: In #825236, Giulio asked me about uploading phonetisaurus to unstable. If I were the maintainer, I would hesitate to make such upload until the following is done: I forgot one thing: * phonetisaurus-calculateER should escape arguments

Importing ubuntu package

Hello! What is common practice about adopting ubuntu packages? I want to adopt ubuntu `btpd' package, but it already have it's changelog. I think it would be impolite to just discard it. What is recommended way to follow Debian policy and still make a credit to previous maintainer? -- Accept:

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: > Thanks for the reply. > > On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working > > > > > the [surface] evolver package ? > > > > A bug with patches

Bug#826134: marked as done (RFS: libvpd/2.2.5-1 ITP: libvpd -- VPD Database access library)

Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:20:52 + (UTC) with message-id <762119202.14969.1465453252783.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826134: RFS: libvpd/2.2.5-1 ITP: libvpd -- VPD Database access library has caused the Debian Bug report #826134, regarding RFS: