Bug#834205: RFS: dh-elpa/1.1 -- Debian helper tools for packaging emacs lisp extensions

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a new release of dh-elpa. My co-maintainer is a DD but his key in the uploaders' keyring has expired and he can't replace it for a while. * Package name: dh-elpa Version : 1.1 Upstream

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

Vincent, The packaging project git I work with is available here https://sourceforge.net/projects/pkg-yuma123/ On 08/06/2016 10:10 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: How should netconfd be running? I see that netconf-subsystem should be configured inside OpenSSH. What about netconfd? Is it spawned by

Bug#834185: RFS: osmose-emulator/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Sega Master System and Game Gear console emulator

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmose-emulator" * Package name: osmose-emulator Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Bruno Vedder * URL :

Bug#834078: RFS: python-argh/0.26.1-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- simple argparse wrapper

control: reopen -1 control: retitle -1 RFS: python-argh/0.26.1-1.2 [NMU] -- simple argparse wrapper control: severity -1 normal Hello, On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:22:09PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Both the original and the new patch look wrong to me: > * C is not the only locale in which the

Bug#827590: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP]

Hi, updated the lua-torch-trepl package, including the change of release to experimental. https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-trepl it passed debomatic-amd64 build: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1/buildlog Concerning

Bug#827590: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP]

Hi, >This is due to, actually "trepl" doesn't B-D on the "lua-torch-torch7-dev" >package. It is a runtime dependency. I'll leave a comment there. >Keeping this runtime B-D there because it declares explicit dependency >relationship. oh, ok >I've thought about spliting it up -- inspece verbose

Bug#834146: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-sys/0~20160415-g8d2b8fa-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:13:59 + (UTC) with message-id <1745796527.23060868.1471011239616.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#834146: RFS: lua-torch-sys/0~20160415-g8d2b8fa-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #834146, regarding RFS:

Re: Bug#834013: emboss, emboss-data: both packages ship /usr/share/man/man1/em_cons.1e.gz

Hi, On 12/08/16 14:58, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > this version was a source only upload. If I build on my local machine > emboss-data does not contain any dir /usr/share/man. However, the > binary package on the Debian mirror contains /usr/share/man/man1 with > has two symlinks which are

Re: Bug#834013: emboss, emboss-data: both packages ship /usr/share/man/man1/em_cons.1e.gz

Hi, >this version was a source only upload. If I build on my local machine >emboss-data does not contain any dir /usr/share/man. However, the >binary package on the Debian mirror contains /usr/share/man/man1 with >has two symlinks which are identical to those in the emboss package. seems

Bug#834146: RFS: lua-torch-sys/0~20160415-g8d2b8fa-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Debomatic-amd64: PASS http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-sys/0~20160415-g8d2b8fa-1/buildlog * Changed target release to experimental * misc updates Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Re: Bug#834013: emboss, emboss-data: both packages ship /usr/share/man/man1/em_cons.1e.gz

Hi, this version was a source only upload. If I build on my local machine emboss-data does not contain any dir /usr/share/man. However, the binary package on the Debian mirror contains /usr/share/man/man1 with has two symlinks which are identical to those in the emboss package. I can not

Bug#833909: RFS: xml-security-c/1.7.3-3~bpo7+1 [BPO]

Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > Hi Ferenc and Etienne, > >>> It'd probably make sense to start with a jessie backport, where >>> this change is necessary, then branch off the wheezy backport from >>> that, and do the PKG_INSTALLDIR change only. > > fully agree > (do you

Bug#827582: missing ITP

Control: block 826793 by 827582 Hi, the missing ITP is found. On 12 August 2016 at 11:30, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Lumin, > > Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": >

Bug#834078: RFS: python-argh/0.26.1-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- simple argparse wrapper

* Sean Whitton , 2016-08-11, 12:07: * Update 0001-fix-unit-tests.patch for newer sbuild (Closes: #832851). The LANG environment variable might not be set. Both the original and the new patch look wrong to me: * C is not the only locale in which the test fails. *

Bug#827895: missing ITP

Control: block 826794 by 827895 Hi, now the missing ITP is found. On 12 August 2016 at 11:23, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Lumin, > > Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": >

Bug#827590: missing ITP

Control: retitle 826791 ITP: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 -- A REPL for Troch Framework Control: block 826791 by 827590 Hi, the ITP is found now. On 12 August 2016 at 11:19, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Lumin, > > Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the

Bug#827582: missing ITP

Hi Lumin, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#822613: missing ITP

Hi Rohan, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#829081: missing ITP

Hi Thomas, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#822149: missing ITP

Hi Herbert, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#827895: missing ITP

Hi Lumin, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#827590: missing ITP

Hi Lumin, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#825390: missing ITP

Hi Emily, Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages": https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage Regards, Bart Martens

Bug#834078: marked as done (RFS: python-argh/0.26.1-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- simple argparse wrapper)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:23:19 + (UTC) with message-id <864192905.22768544.1470993799476.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#834078: RFS: python-argh/0.26.1-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- simple argparse wrapper has caused the Debian Bug report #834078, regarding RFS: