Bug#837210: RFS: lua-torch-torch7/0~20160908-ge5ebac6-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-torch7/0~20160908-ge5ebac6-1/buildlog Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-torch7" * Package name:

Re: Why does dh_installdebconf not add translations?

Found the issue myself, sorry for the noise, Andreas. On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:45:19AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to add translations to the debconf template of metaphlan2-data[1]. > Unfortunately if I call > > fakeroot dh_installdebconf > > the resulting

Bug#837209: RFS: lua-torch-nn/0~20160908-g9d7b9ea+dfsg-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-nn/0~20160908-g9d7b9ea+dfsg-1/buildlog Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-nn" * Package name: lua-torch-nn

Bug#837196: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.6-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" * Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.2.6-2 Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com * URL :

Re: opencl-headers : Depends: opencl-clhpp-headers

On 09/09/16 19:33, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I tried to build libhmsbeagle[1] in pbuilder but this results in: opencl-headers : Depends: opencl-clhpp-headers (>= 2.0.10) which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package I admit I have no idea what this means since I do

opencl-headers : Depends: opencl-clhpp-headers

Hi, I tried to build libhmsbeagle[1] in pbuilder but this results in: opencl-headers : Depends: opencl-clhpp-headers (>= 2.0.10) which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package I admit I have no idea what this means since I do not understand why any package depends

Re: pacakge suffix: noSOMETHIN vs bare (or something)

* Jerome BENOIT , 2016-09-09, 13:45: I am packaging a software of general use which can be or not built against a quite heavy library targeting a minority. I plan to provide two versions of the package: you got it, one without support of the concerned library;

Re: pacakge suffix: noSOMETHIN vs bare (or something)

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:45:07PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > For the package > supporting the library I plan to append the suffix -[LIBRARY SHORT NAME]. > Concerning the other one, > I am wondering if -bare or -pure (or something) would be a better choice than > -no[LIBRARY SHORT NAME]. >

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aiscm": * Package name: aiscm Version : 0.6.2-2 Upstream Author : Jan Wedekind * URL : http://wedesoft.github.io/aiscm/ * License : GPL-3+

pacakge suffix: noSOMETHIN vs bare (or something)

Hello Forum, I am packaging a software of general use which can be or not built against a quite heavy library targeting a minority. I plan to provide two versions of the package: you got it, one without support of the concerned library; one with support. A suffix must be added to the packages

Why does dh_installdebconf not add translations?

Hi, I tried to add translations to the debconf template of metaphlan2-data[1]. Unfortunately if I call fakeroot dh_installdebconf the resulting debian/metaphlan2-data/DEBIAN/templates is basically a copy of debian/templates: $ diff debian/metaphlan2-data/DEBIAN/templates debian/templates

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

Hi >ohhh, totally get it. thanks for spotting it thanks for getting it ;) is the only way i found to silence lintian about non-encrypted Vcs- urls "https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/couchapp.git; and "https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/couchapp.git; simple as that :)