Bug#837319: marked as done (RFS: cdist/4.3.1-2 )

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:53:42 +0200 with message-id <20160911235341.gr3...@sym.noone.org> and subject line Re: Bug#837311: cdist: FTBFS with some additional packages being installed: ImportError: No module named sphinx_rtd_theme has caused the Debian Bug report #837319, regarding

Bug#837476: RFS: willow/0.3.1-1 [ITP #837471]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "willow" * Package name: willow Version : 0.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Torchbox * URL : https://github.com/torchbox/Willow * License

Bug#837475: RFS: dh-runit/1.6.1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit" * Package name: dh-runit Version : 1.6.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url :

Bug#837474: RFS: runit/2.1.2-8

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" * Package name: runit Version : 2.1.2-8 Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape * Url : http://smarden.org/runit/ * Licenses:

Re: Why does dh_installdebconf not add translations?

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:14:52PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Tell us what the problem was, so that we can learn too. The text consisted of three paragraphs - one with pure code. I somehow did not minded / forgot to "translate" the code part. It seems that a missing paragraph in the translation

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 08:27:11PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > > I think you also need to do the build with -sa, as you need to upload > > the full sources to security-master. > > I pushed it to the mentors. That wasn't really something for you, but more something for whoever sponsor this.

Re: Why does dh_installdebconf not add translations?

* Andreas Tille , 2016-09-10, 07:02: Found the issue myself, sorry for the noise, Andreas. Tell us what the problem was, so that we can learn too. Remark: Enhancements / proof reading of the debconf template text are welcome as well. Due to the large data set I do not like

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

On 10.09.2016 14:57 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Dear LTS team, Mateusz: Hi Mattia! On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:47AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:53:49AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Adam, (answering in general, not in this particular situation)

EFL/1.18, Enlightenment/0.21 updates

Hello, If anyone has time and interest, I'm looking for more feedback on Enlightenment 0.21 and EFL 1.18 packages that are uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/efl/efl_1.18.0-1.dsc https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/e17/e17_0.21.2-1.dsc Some particular

Bug#837408: RFS: partimage/0.6.9-1 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Contol: tag 837408 moreinfo Hi Andrew, I have some considerations: 1. d/changelog: - You are doing a QA upload. So, it must be in changelog. - You renamed the patch 03-ftbfs-zlib.patch to 01-ftbfs-zlib. Please, point it in changelog. 2. d/control: - Please, bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8.

Bug#837408: RFS: partimage/0.6.9-1 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "partimage" * Package name: partimage Version : 0.6.9-1 Upstream Author : Orphaned package * URL :

Bug#837319: Bug#837312: nmu: cdist_4.3.1-1

Hi, On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 05:51:38PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > dh_linktree. Replacing files (images, fonts, ...) with symbolic links > > > in deduplicate mode. > > > > > > I could drop it, it would result in increased binary package size and, > > > what bothers me more, several

Bug#836709: marked as done (RFS: 9wm/1.3.9-1)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2016 08:36:20 + (UTC) with message-id <571617011.5384498.1473582980...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836709: RFS: 9wm/1.3.9-1 (For real this time) has caused the Debian Bug report #836709, regarding RFS: 9wm/1.3.9-1 to be marked as done. This means