Javascript Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Without Javascript the web becomes a much more unexcited place. Regrettably Iceweasel seems not to offer finely granulated enabling. A whitelist would be nice. That's available in xul-ext-noscript

Bug#838239: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" * Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.2.7-2 Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com * URL :

Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications

On 2016-09-18 17:39, Thomas Pircher wrote: W: libcgicc5: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libcgicc3 This should be fixed by the renaming from libcgicc5* -> libcgicc*. Thinking again, I guess that's not correct. This would require the packages to be renamed to libcgicc3. Thomas

Bug#838140: 838140

Hi lumin, please update the sources for download thanks

Bug#838217: RFS: license-reconcile/0.12+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on license-reconcile It closes an FTBFS RC bug. The debdiff is attached The package can be downloaded from -mentors

Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications

On 2016-09-15 10:49, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: changes are huge, but being half mia, and on lowNMU threshold... (and too many bugs here, so lets do it) First of all, thanks for the detailed review. I have addressed most issues but not yet uploaded a new version to mentors, pending a couple

Bug#838140: RFS: zfs-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU] -- git format-patch -- version 4

Hi, I refreshed the whole patch stack, with some new changes added. * add a patch to enable zfs-import-scan.service by default.   in 0.6.5.7 all zfs services are enabled, and in 0.6.5.8 all   services are enabled by upstream except for zfs-import-scan. * add the missing zfs.target .From

Bug#837408: marked as done (RFS: partimage/0.6.9-1 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:19:01 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9 has caused the Debian Bug report #837408, regarding RFS: partimage/0.6.9-1 new upstream

Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Hi Andrew, Fine! Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-18 5:03 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : > Ok Uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... > On 18 September 2016 at 00:58, Eriberto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Hello, 2016-09-17 22:31 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton : > Hello Boyuan, > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:23:48PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: >> Yes, they are up-to-date now. The package on debian-mentors is also >> updated. > > The packaging is in great shape. Here's a review for

Bug#838014: marked as done (RFS: imagemagick/8:6.9.5.9+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:46:31 + with message-id <20160918084621.pezpdtwujdnvl...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#838014: RFS: imagemagick has caused the Debian Bug report #838014, regarding RFS: imagemagick/8:6.9.5.9+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#829520: RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP

On 08/31, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote: Mentors, I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog Mentors, I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error gbp:error:

Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Ok Uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... On 18 September 2016 at 00:58, Eriberto wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : >> On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, > > However, the

Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Hi, Quoting Thomas Schmitt (2016-09-18 09:09:09) > Johannes Schauer wrote: > > [the need for Javascript] should be reported as a bug against the tracker. > > Submitted as > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838178 > and subscribed to it. thanks! > > imagine an

Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Hi, Johannes Schauer wrote: > [the need for Javascript] should be reported as a bug against the tracker. Submitted as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838178 and subscribed to it. i wrote: > > Doesn't "Architecture: all" imply "Multi-arch: foreign" ? > No.

Bug#838180: RFS: mmh/0.3-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mmh" * Package name: mmh Version : 0.3-2 Upstream Author : markus schnalke * Url : http://marmaro.de/prog/mmh/ * Licenses: