Re: Data updates in debian packages

Christian Seiler writes: > On 10/30/2016 10:20 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> IETF is responsible for internet standards, not for leap seconds. They >> will take the leap seconds from IERS. I would assume that this >> connection is well-established to rely on it. I was not so

RE: get 403 Forbidden when upload package to mentors.

Hi G. Thanks for reply. You are right, now I can upload the file now. However, it still failed, seems I can only upload the .dsc file. The tar.gz will have HTTP 503 error. Do you have any suggestion? Command details: gxxu@zion-debian:~/works/pbuild/libyami$ tsocks dput -f mentors

Re: Re: Finding the correct alignment for all architectures

Thanks guys, I went with _Alignof(double), which interestingly aligns to 8 bytes on amd64. Thomas

Bug#842597: marked as done (RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:48:03 + with message-id <20161030234801.qh4u2xsiwlo45...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#842597: RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #842597, regarding RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#842597: RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:11:01PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pythonmagick" > > o/ > >> Alternatively, one can

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2

Dear Boyuan, On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:25:22PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I just reviewed the latest changes in your nixnote2 git repo, as part of > confirming that nixnote2 works with the new qevercloud shlib. > > I have the following remaining suggestions (none are "must fix"): Are you

Re: Non-NEW backports rejected with "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed"

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:04:16AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am trying to update the following packages in jessie-backports: > > gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1.git > gbp clone

Bug#842597: RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:11:01PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pythonmagick" o/ > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x

Bug#841222: Acknowledgement (RFS: patat)

Hello Félix, I noticed that you've published your patch-queue/master branch. Since that is a branch you will rebase, it's not a good idea to publish it (the gbp documentation recommends against publishing it). Anyone who needs the branch can reconstruct it with `gbp pq import`. Unfortunately,

Bug#842597: RFS: [RC] pythonmagick/0.9.14-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pythonmagick" * Package name: pythonmagick Version : 0.9.14-1 Upstream Author : imagemagick team * URL : www.imagemagick.org * License :

Re: Non-NEW backports rejected with "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed"

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:19:41AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > I would recommend to use dput from dput-ng instead of plain old > dput, because that will catch the discrepancy between the distribution > in the changelog and the changes file. It prints a nice error message > explaining the

Re: Non-NEW backports rejected with "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed"

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:11:06AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > from the first .changes: > > | Distribution: jessie > > that's wrong, you are trying to upload to the stable distribution, > instead of jessie-backports. > > Am I right that you used sbuild with -D to build this package? Thanks,

Bug#842588: RFS: photo-booth/1.0.1~rc1-1 [ITP Bug#788954]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "photo-booth" * Package name: photo-booth Version : 1.0.1~rc1-1 Upstream Author : Adam Roses Wight * URL :

Bug#842160: marked as done (RFS: python-memory-profiler/0.41+git20161018-1 [RC])

Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:56:03 + with message-id <20161030105601.jgoypavwgqqhd...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#842160: RFS: python-memory-profiler/0.40-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #842160, regarding RFS: python-memory-profiler/0.41+git20161018-1 [RC] to

Re: Non-NEW backports rejected with "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed"

On 10/30/2016 11:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:04:16AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: >> Older versions of the packages already exist in jessie-backports. My >> key has been added to the backports ACL (and has worked for similar >> updates in the past), and I have DM

Re: Non-NEW backports rejected with "ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed"

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:04:16AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Older versions of the packages already exist in jessie-backports. My > key has been added to the backports ACL (and has worked for similar > updates in the past), and I have DM upload rights for the packages. > > My uploads for both

Re: Data updates in debian packages

On 30.10.2016 04:38, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> The update script itself could even be distributed with the casacore >> package itself. And for simplicity I would make >> casacore-data-autoupdater a binary package within the casacore source >>

Re: Data updates in debian packages

On 10/30/2016 10:20 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > IETF is responsible for internet standards, not for leap seconds. They > will take the leap seconds from IERS. I would assume that this > connection is well-established to rely on it. I was not so much > questioning upstream here, but I worry a bit

Re: Data updates in debian packages

On 30.10.2016 04:42, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> The canonical source for leap seconds is the IERS. Our current plan was >> to take the leap second list from there and build our package from this >> (as it is done in the casacore-data upstream).

Bug#837748: kpm core updates

I have the latest work of this in: https://gitlab.com/highvoltage/kpmcore-packaging/tree/master/debian I haven't figured out what the best way is to deal with the symbol files, but I'll ask for help from the debian-kde team and also move that repository to the KDE team if that's possible.

Bug#842531: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-impatience/0.4.3-1, ITP: 842014 -- speed up the gnome-shell animation speed

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors (cc debian-python), I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bundlewrap": * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-impatience Version : 0.4.3-1 Upstream Author : Tim Cuthbertson * URL :