Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed

[2016-11-18 08:54] Christian Seiler > I'm hence removing the moreinfo tag, because your course of action > to remove dietlibc-dev from Build-Depends of your package is the > right one. If at some point in the future bglibs are recompiled > against dietlibc (in addition to

Re: can't upload to mentors

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:54:20PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > After all it does not seem that it has been uploaded... > > I may have typed to fast "dput patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes" without > mentioning mentors. Anyway, it seems like the package is uploaded ftp-master > UploadQueue... Is it

Bug#844773: RFS: ustr/1.0.4-6

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr" * Package name: ustr Version : 1.0.4-6 Upstream Author : James Antill * URL : http://www.and.org/ustr/ * License : LGPL, BSD, MIT

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hi >See license.html. The project is GPL-2, but some files have GPL-2+ in >their headers. rescheduled, thanks :) and sorry for the useless question G.

Re: Pseudotransition

Hi, >Spoke slightly too soon -- I'm not sure yet whether libghc-zxcvbn-dev >even needs a binNMU. So it might be that there is an ABI break, but it >affects no packages in Debian -- would that still be violating the >freeze? > >(To be specific: the ZxcvbnInfo struct, which is passed to the

Re: Pseudotransition

Hello, s/libghc-zxcvbn-dev/libghc-zxcvbn-c-dev/ in my previous message. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:24:40PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > libghc-zxcvbn-dev does not require any code changes to work with the > new version of libzxcvbn: just a rebuild. Spoke slightly too soon -- I'm not sure yet

Pseudotransition

Hello, There is a new release of my package libzxcvbn which has an ABI break, though upstream failed to bump the SONAME in the Makefile. However, the only package in unstable that links against libzxcvbn is libghc-zxcvbn-dev, which is also my package (there is also keysafe, but that's in

Re: can't upload to mentors

Hello Félix, On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:54:20PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > I may have typed to fast "dput patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes" without > mentioning mentors. Anyway, it seems like the package is uploaded ftp-master > UploadQueue... Is it possible to verify if the package is there? Can I

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

Hello Gianfranco, On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:54:01PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I put the package in deferred/5, because I'm not sure about the whole > license. > Isn't it something like GPL-2+ instead of GPL-2? > I agree single files are ok, but the "*" wildcard seems a GPL-2+ to

Bug#844769: RFS: node-resumer/0.0.0-1 [RFP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-resumer" * Package name: node-resumer Version : 0.0.0-1 Upstream Author : James Halliday (http://substack.net) * URL

Bug#832704: marked as done (RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:54:01 + (UTC) with message-id <2023750558.5647606.1479495241...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client has caused the Debian Bug report #832704, regarding RFS:

Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:04:02PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > [ Ross Vandegrift ] > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > Hi Ross, can you please fix and answer if you want to maintain or not > the package? Sorry for the slow response - I'm planning to fix this weekend, and adopt

Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

control: reopen -1 > [ Ross Vandegrift ] > * Non-maintainer upload. Hi Ross, can you please fix and answer if you want to maintain or not the package? thanks, G.

Bug#844734: marked as done (RFS: dvbcut/0.7.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:48:55 + (UTC) with message-id <1096922853.826071.1479487735...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#844734: RFS: dvbcut/0.7.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #844734, regarding RFS: dvbcut/0.7.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#844242: marked as done (RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU])

Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:33:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #844242, regarding RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that

Re: can't upload to mentors

After all it does not seem that it has been uploaded... I may have typed to fast "dput patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes" without mentioning mentors. Anyway, it seems like the package is uploaded ftp-master UploadQueue... Is it possible to verify if the package is there? Can I remove it from there

Bug#844734: RFS: dvbcut/0.7.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvbcut" * Package name: dvbcut Version : 0.7.1-1 Upstream Author : Bernhard Übelacker * URL : https://github.com/bernhardu/dvbcut-deb * License : GPL-2+

Re: Does license statement be included in each project file?

Chiara Marmo writes: > The license is clearly identified in the COPYING[2] file Thank you for linking to the file; the document there is the standard GNU Library General Public License version 2. Note that file is only the text of a particular set of license conditions.

Bug#829081: marked as done (RFS: python3-adns/1.2.3-1 [ITP, NMU] -- A Python-3 port of the python-adns package)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:22:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python3-adns/1.2.3-1 [ITP, NMU] -- A Python-3 port of the python-adns package has caused the Debian Bug report #829081, regarding RFS: python3-adns/1.2.3-1 [ITP,