Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

Hi Lumin, I don't think a Cc is needed, all of us (should be) subscribed to this mailing list. On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:32 AM, lumin wrote: > I prepared an NMU for protobuf for adding > python3-protobuf binary package, and now > I'm asking for maintainer comments and >

Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

Hi, I prepared an NMU for protobuf for adding python3-protobuf binary package, and now I'm asking for maintainer comments and looking for sponsor. The package is available at  https://mentors.debian.net/package/protobuf

Bug#844608: Acknowledgement (RFS: protobuf/3.0.0-7.1 [NMU])

Hi, I just updated the package on mentors, https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/protobuf/protobuf_3.0.0-7.1.dsc https://mentors.debian.net/package/protobuf And it passed the build on debomatic-amd64 http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/protobuf/3.0.0-7.1/buildlog The

Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:46:24PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > So I'll prepare another version that consists only of the security fix > backported to jessie. The new version will wait for experimental. Here it is, this time just adopting and fixing the security issue:

Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:53:58PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Cool, please move "New maintainer" to the front so it's better visible. > > Alas, I'm afraid it doesn't quite work for me. In the first run, after > maximizing it stopped redrawing its window and had to be killed (doesn't > seem to

Bug#845264: RFS: ublock-origin/1.9.16+dfsg-1~bpo8+1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: block 844003 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a backport of ublock-origin. * Package name: ublock-origin Version : 1.9.16+dfsg-1~bpo8+1 Upstream Author : Raymond Hill * URL :

Re: can't upload to mentors

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 02:17:26PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > The remaining question is, is this .buildinfo issue on my side or on mentors'? mentor's -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: can't upload to mentors

On 2016-11-21 14:17+0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > OK, it worked. Thanks! Or, at least, it seemed to. I still can't see anything on mentors... $ dput mentors patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes --force Uploading patat using http to mentors (host: mentors.debian.net; directory: /upload)

Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:43:56AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > I've uploaded an updated package to: > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.9.1-1.dsc > > New changelog: > > [ Ross Vandegrift ] > * New upstream release >- Fix for "CVE-2015-8971: Escape

Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:04:02PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Ross, can you please fix and answer if you want to maintain or not > the package? I've uploaded an updated package to: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.9.1-1.dsc New changelog: [

Bug#845215: RFS: globjects/1.0.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects" * Package name: globjects Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : CG Internals * URL : http://globjects.org/ * License : Expat Section :

Re: can't upload to mentors

OK, it worked. Thanks! The remaining question is, is this .buildinfo issue on my side or on mentors'? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons

On 2016-11-21 at 07:56, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett : >> I'm open to accepting patches / co-maintainership from anyone who >> wishes to test and use traditional init scripts with quagga. Given >> the longevity of bugs like #678946, I'm

Bug#829520: marked as done (RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:25:21 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #829520, regarding RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem