Re: usbguard soname stability

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 07:50:06AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Usually, a soname of 0 implies unstable ABI so those hypothethical users > are warned. Um. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: usbguard soname stability

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:34:34PM +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote: > the usbguard source package ships a shared library libusbguard0. i asked > upstream about bumping the soname when the interface changes, but > upstream considers usbguard 0.x as not stable yet and will start > maintaining soname

Bug#847101: (no subject)

Hi Lucio, Thanks for contributing to Debian. Unfortunately I was not able to build this package, since it is failing when building: Makefile:129: recipe for target 'de_DE.gmo' failed make[4]: *** [de_DE.gmo] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs rm -f fr_FR.gmo &&

Bug#847102: RFS: ginger/2.3.0-1 - HTML5-based host management tool

Hello Lucio, Thanks for contributing to Debian. I found some issues with this package: 1) There are some lintian errors. Please fix them. 2) The package is not able to be rebuild, i.e, the clean process does not seem to be clear. These are the problems I am facing when I run two times a

Bug#847171: Info received (Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS)

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will

Processed: Re: Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 soapdenovo2: FTBFS with parallel builds (dpkg-buildpackage -J$n, > $n > 1) Bug #847171 [src:soapdenovo2] soapdenovo2: FTBFS: standardPregraph/iterate.o: file not recognized: File truncated Changed Bug title to 'soapdenovo2: FTBFS with parallel builds

Bug#847305: Bug#847050: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button -- A GNOME Extension to add a log out button to the system activities menu

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Most of #847308 also applies here. -- tobi

Re: Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS

Control: retitle -1 soapdenovo2: FTBFS with parallel builds (dpkg-buildpackage -J$n, $n > 1) On 12/08/2016 09:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:11:07PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:58:37AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> it seems there are

Bug#847108: (no subject)

Hello Lucio, Thanks for contributing to Debian. I just run lintian on this package, and it seems to contain one error and one warning: E: ginger-base source: missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon python2 => python:any | python-all:any | python-dev:any | python-all-dev:any W: ginger-base

Bug#847308: Bug#847076: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Kyle, (sorry, I missed a bit the last review) d/changelog: - do not bump version until the first upload is done. in other words, it should just read, no other entries gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts (1.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium   * Initial Upload (Closes:

Re: Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:11:07PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:58:37AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > it seems there are different ways how the build fails but its totally > > unclear to me why this happens. > The package just built fine in my sbuild chroot for 3

Bug#847308: Bug#847076: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

On 06/12/2016 23:45, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > please also open a RFS bug for this.. Done > > packaging: > - there is a missing Dependency on gnome-shell Added > > upstream: > - the version constraint metadata.json looks weird: 3.22.2... > shouldn't it be only 3.22 or like? Not

Bug#847305: Bug#847050: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button -- A GNOME Extension to add a log out button to the system activities menu

On 06/12/2016 23:34, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hallo Kyle, > > Please open up a RFS bug and also bounce this mail to the bug. Done > > Review: > > - the packaging seems fine > > upstream related: > - seems so that the gschema is not needed, is it? No it isn't, I shall remove it > - when

Bug#847305: Bug#847050: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button -- A GNOME Extension to add a log out button to the system activities menu

Hallo Kyle, Please open up a RFS bug and also bounce this mail to the bug. Review: - the packaging seems fine upstream related: - seems so that the gschema is not needed, is it? - when disabling the extension (e.g via gnome-tweak-tool), the icon stays in the menu. This is bug, I guess as e.g

Bug#847308: Bug#847076: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

Hi Kyle, please also open a RFS bug for this.. packaging: - there is a missing Dependency on gnome-shell upstream: - the version constraint metadata.json looks weird: 3.22.2... shouldn't it be only 3.22 or like? Not sure, please x-check. (this is also something for the logout button

Bug#847175: marked as done (RFS: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor/31-1 ITP: 847080 -- Display system information in GNOME Shell status bar)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:31:59 +0100 with message-id <20161208193158.csdsg6fn7kxgq...@coldtobi.de> and subject line Re: Bug#847175: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor/31-1, ITP: 847080 -- Display system information in GNOME Shell status bar has caused the Debian Bug report

Bug#847197: marked as done (RFS: gnome-shell-extension-multi-monitors ITP: 847178 -- Better support for additional monitors in GNOME shell)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:08:20 +0100 with message-id <20161208190819.estxgjyyfl37k...@coldtobi.de> and subject line Re: Bug#847197: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-multi-monitors ITP: 847178 -- Better support for additional monitors in GNOME shell has caused the Debian Bug report #847197,

Bug#847458: RFS: clues-emacs/0~2014.09.23.69d873c-1 ITP

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello Dmitry, Here's a review for you. I also made two commits to your repository -- please see the commit messages for an explanation. Hopefully you will agree with the changes ;) Must-fixes == 1. Your most recent changes are newer than

Bug#842520: RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:47:15PM (-0500), Daniel Echeverry wrote: > Could you check it out again? > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/glances.git > > Really, thank you very much! Hello Daniel, Gianfranco, Sorry Daniel for the delay on this one :-/ Just fixed a lintian warning,

Bug#847120: RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.7-1

> maybe you should repack, or describe them in copyright file I repacked the source tarball and removed these (and some others) unneeded binary files. I updated the package at mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/engauge-digitizer dget -x

Re: usbguard soname stability

On 12/08/2016 02:34 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: > the usbguard source package ships a shared library libusbguard0. i asked > upstream about bumping the soname when the interface changes, but > upstream considers usbguard 0.x as not stable yet and will start > maintaining soname version beginninig with

Bug#847432: marked as done (RFS: node-clone/2.1.0-1)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:23:30 + (UTC) with message-id <42083487.787503.1481214210...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847432: RFS: node-clone/2.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847432, regarding RFS: node-clone/2.1.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#847433: marked as done (RFS: node-magic-string/0.19.0-1)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:23:30 + (UTC) with message-id <42083487.787503.1481214210...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847432: RFS: node-clone/2.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847433, regarding RFS: node-magic-string/0.19.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#847435: marked as done (RFS: node-esprima/3.1.2+ds-1)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:18:14 + (UTC) with message-id <1590872537.766343.1481213894...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847435: RFS: node-esprima/3.1.2+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847435, regarding RFS: node-esprima/3.1.2+ds-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#847434: marked as done (RFS: node-es6-shim/0.35.2+ds-1)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:19:52 + (UTC) with message-id <1591888760.735099.1481213992...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847434: RFS: node-es6-shim/0.35.2+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847434, regarding RFS: node-es6-shim/0.35.2+ds-1 to be marked as done. This

Re: usbguard soname stability

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:34:34PM +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote: > if the shared library is not stable, it > maybe makes more sense to not ship it- but the main program use it. is > there a way of including a 'shared' library without sharing it? Link it statically. Or put it into /usr/lib//usbguard/

usbguard soname stability

hi, the usbguard source package ships a shared library libusbguard0. i asked upstream about bumping the soname when the interface changes, but upstream considers usbguard 0.x as not stable yet and will start maintaining soname version beginninig with 1.x (which is understandable). i tried a buch

Bug#847470: RFS: docopt.cpp/0.6.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "docopt.cpp" * Package name: docopt.cpp   Version : 0.6.2-1   Upstream Author : Jared Grubb * URL : https://github.com/docopt/docopt.cpp * License : MIT / BSL

Bug#847458: RFS: clues-emacs/0~2014.09.23.69d873c-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clues-emacs" * Package name: clues-emacs Version : 0~2014.09.23.69d873c-1 Upstream Author : Jason Milkins * Url :

Bug#844537: marked as done (RFS: fxlinuxprint/1.1.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- printer driver for Fuji Xerox printers)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2016 10:24:56 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: fxlinuxprint/1.1.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- printer driver for Fuji Xerox printers has caused the Debian Bug report #844537, regarding RFS: fxlinuxprint/1.1.0+ds-1 [ITP] --

Bug#842520: marked as done (RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2016 10:24:55 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #842520, regarding RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:58:37AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > it seems there are different ways how the build fails but its totally > unclear to me why this happens. The package just built fine in my sbuild chroot for 3 times. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Help needed for Bug#847171 soapdenovo2: Different output, still FTBFS

Hi, it seems there are different ways how the build fails but its totally unclear to me why this happens. On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:33:14AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I could not repeat the exact output Chris got. > > Still FTBFS on my end in a clean chroot, with the following output: >

Bug#847435: RFS: node-esprima/3.1.2+ds-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-esprima" * Package name: node-esprima Version : 3.1.2+ds-1 Upstream Author : jQuery Foundation, Inc., Ariya Hidayat * URL : http://esprima.org *

Bug#847434: RFS: node-es6-shim/0.35.2+ds-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-es6-shim" * Package name: node-es6-shim Version : 0.35.2+ds-1 Upstream Author : Paul Miller and contributors * URL :

Bug#847432: RFS: node-clone/2.1.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-clone" * Package name: node-clone Version : 2.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Paul Vorbach * URL : https://github.com/pvorb/node-clone * License :

Bug#847433: RFS: node-magic-string/0.19.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-magic-string" * Package name: node-magic-string Version : 0.19.0-1 Upstream Author : Rich Harris * URL : https://github.com/rich-harris/magic-string