Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Well, adding xvfb was the usual trick to cope with "unable to open X11 > display" messages and thus I added it ... To me it looks like you didn't add it yet, at least not to the version in Debian. -- bye, pabs

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

Hi Paul, On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:07:11AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Any help would be really appreciated. > > Looking at the build logs, even the architectures that succeeded are > getting the warning about X11. So that is completely unrelated and the > issue is the segfault not the xvfb

Any chance to provide upstream access to armhf machine thats comparable to our autobuilder?

Hi, when discussing bug #800469 upstream thinks that armhf should work and the question came up whether there is some chance to access an armhf machine that is comparable to our autobuilders. Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from daviesrob -

Bug#847989: marked as done (RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-1 [QA])

Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:25:57 +0500 with message-id <20161213062557.ksmaq77kposkx...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#847989: RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-1 [QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #847989, regarding RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-1 [QA] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#847308: Bug#847076: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

On 12/12/2016 22:57, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Montag, den 12.12.2016, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Kyle Robbertze: >> On 08/12/2016 21:44, Tobias Frost wrote: >>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >>> >>> Hi Kyle, >>> >>> (sorry, I missed a bit the last review) >>> >>> d/changelog: >>> - do not bump version

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:51:36PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: > > There is no such package in the archive. Is this a new package? If yes, > > please follow the procedures outlined at > > https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers > > > > Hi Andrey, > Thanks for your email. The version 0.6.2-2

Bug#847305: Bug#847050: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button -- A GNOME Extension to add a log out button to the system activities menu

> > two more points to be fixed: > > - you do not write "rm -f " in d/clean, just filenames/paths. See > dh_clean(1) > > - metadata.json still says 3.22.2 > Both are now fixed Cheers Kyle signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#847989: RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-1 [QA]

Changed On 13 December 2016 at 06:03, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > You should change the Maintainer field to "Debian QA Group > ", see > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ > ch05.en.html#orphaning > >

Bug#847989: RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-1 [QA]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo You should change the Maintainer field to "Debian QA Group ", see https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#orphaning -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#847774: marked as done (RFS: lbzip2/2.5-2 [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:01:05 +0500 with message-id <20161213060105.hy432p2nwnocb...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#847774: RFS: lbzip2/2.5-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #847774, regarding RFS: lbzip2/2.5-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I admit I do not only lack the hardware I'm also lacking experience to > track down this kind of problems. I discussed the issue with upstream > and they also do not have any clue. > > Any help would be really appreciated. Looking at the

Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.

Fredag den 9:e december 2016, klockan 12:45, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta: > Hi, > > >There is no problem to fetch the key. The problem is to use it. My present > > >use case is this > > > > gpgv --homedir debian/upstream --keyring debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp \ > >archive.sig

Bug#847774: RFS: lbzip2/2.5-2 [RC]

Hi Andrey, On 12/12/16, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > You've replaced orig.tar.bz2 with orig.tar.gz. Is this intended? If yes, > why? If no, please fix this. No, that was not intended, thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now. -- Mikolaj Izdebski

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

Lyn/Carly On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 05:29:24PM +0100, Jan Wedekind wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aiscm": * Package name: aiscm Version : 0.6.2-2 Upstream Author

Bug#847989: RFS: yacpi/3.0.1-1 [QA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yacpi" * Package name: yacpi Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Nico Golde * URL : http://www.ngolde.de/yacpi.html * License : GPL-2

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On Monday, 12 December 2016 11:09:56 AM AEDT Félix Sipma wrote: > From gbp-dch(1): > >--id-length=N > Include N digits of the commit id in the > changelog entry. Default is to not include > any commit ids at all. > > So, that's already the

Bug#847308: Bug#847076: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

Am Montag, den 12.12.2016, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Kyle Robbertze: > On 08/12/2016 21:44, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi Kyle, > > > > (sorry, I missed a bit the last review) > > > > d/changelog: > > - do not bump version until the first upload is done.  > >   in other

Bug#847305: Bug#847050: ITP: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button -- A GNOME Extension to add a log out button to the system activities menu

Hi Kyle, Am Montag, den 12.12.2016, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Kyle Robbertze: > On 08/12/2016 21:51, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Most of #847308 also applies here. > > Fixed > > > > -- > > tobi  > > two more points to be fixed: - you do not write "rm -f " in

Bug#847978: RFS: patat/0.4.5.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "patat": patat - Terminal-based presentations using Pandoc Package: patat Version: 0.4.5.0-1 Upstream Author: Jasper Van der Jeugt Homepage:

Bug#843119: marked as done (RFS: wordplay/7.22-18 [QA])

Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:58:20 +0500 with message-id <20161212185820.uzeiyixcvzgs6...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#843119: RFS: wordplay/7.22-18 [QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #843119, regarding RFS: wordplay/7.22-18 [QA] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#843119: RFS: wordplay/7.22-18 [QA]

My apologies, these problems have now been fixed. I must admit that I was unaware of the debian/clean file, and I had thought that any manpages were automatically picked up On 12 December 2016 at 17:54, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > Control: owner -1

Bug#846329: RFS: tsctp/0.6.3-1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Is this a new package? if so you need to make an ITP bug and close it in the changelog and your changelog entry shouldn't be "New upstream version". -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#847607: RFS: zconfig/3.1.0-1

Uploaded, thanks. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#847607: marked as done (RFS: zconfig/3.1.0-1)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:10:37 +0500 with message-id <20161212181037.kjdrffiisj6sg...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#847607: RFS: zconfig/3.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847607, regarding RFS: zconfig/3.1.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#846327: RFS: bibtexconv/1.1.7-1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo You didn't keep the previous changelog entry. You need to keep it and you need to document in the new one the changes you've made to the package, see https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch06.en.html#bpp-debian-changelog Current standards version is

Bug#843119: RFS: wordplay/7.22-18 [QA]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! You ship debian/wordplay.1 but you don't install it. You remove a file in override_dh_clean, you can use debian/clean instead. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#838845: RFS: puppet-module-puppetlabs-motd/1.4.0-1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:46:02PM -0400, Gustavo Soares de Lima wrote: > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] You are supposed to make a choice here... > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 05:29:24PM +0100, Jan Wedekind wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aiscm": > > * Package name: aiscm > Version : 0.6.2-2 > Upstream Author : Jan Wedekind > * URL :

Bug#847588: marked as done (RFS: validator.js/4.7.1+dfsg1-1.1 (RC, NMU))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:36:05 +0500 with message-id <20161212173605.mzuychx36adq5...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#847588: RFS: validator.js/4.7.1+dfsg1-1.1 (RC, NMU) has caused the Debian Bug report #847588, regarding RFS: validator.js/4.7.1+dfsg1-1.1 (RC, NMU) to be

Bug#847774: RFS: lbzip2/2.5-2 [RC]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo You've replaced orig.tar.bz2 with orig.tar.gz. Is this intended? If yes, why? If no, please fix this. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#847586: marked as done (RFS: colord-gtk/0.1.26-1.1 (RC, NMU))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:26:16 +0500 with message-id <20161212172616.dmvvctc3w5g2t...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#847586: RFS: colord-gtk/0.1.26-1.1 (RC, NMU) has caused the Debian Bug report #847586, regarding RFS: colord-gtk/0.1.26-1.1 (RC, NMU) to be marked as done.

Bug#847586: RFS: colord-gtk/0.1.26-1.1 (RC, NMU)

Uploaded to DELAYED/5, thanks. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-ldap" * Package name: libpam-ldap Version : 186-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] *

Bug#847948: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-sisusb/1:0.9.6-2.1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xserver-xorg-video-sisusb" * Package name: xserver-xorg-video-sisusb Version : 1:0.9.6-2.1 Upstream Author : Thomas Winischhofer * URL :

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

On 2016-10-31 17:09, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, thanks for the review, I've fixed licenses now, can you review again? lets see interval_tree_generic.h: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) still wrong (missing the later clause) xxhash.c ^^ wrong license G. This

Bug#847941: RFS: libvecpf/1.1.0-1 ITP: libvecpf -- Vector Printf Library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvecpf" Package name: libvecpf Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : libvecpf team URL : https://github.com/Libvecpf/libvecpf License : LGPL-2.1+, GPL-3+

Bug#845971: marked as done (RFS: davmail/4.7.3.2438-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#845971: fixed in davmail 4.7.3.2438-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #845971, regarding RFS: davmail/4.7.3.2438-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#847923: RFS:ltrace/0.7.3-6.1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:56:31PM +0100, TFAUCK wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "ltrace". > This is a packaging update : > > paflib (0.7.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium ltrace or paflib? And where is the changelog? > To access

Bug#847923: RFS:ltrace/0.7.3-6.1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "ltrace". This is a packaging update : paflib (0.7.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium This is a package update to support ppc64le arch. Since there is no real release

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On 2016-12-08 06:35+1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I had a glimpse at the package and it looks good except removed content of > "gbp.conf" that I'll leave for Félix to fix (if he thinks it necessary). > > Félix, in "gbp.conf" > > > [dch] > id-length= 0 > > > is occasionally

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

Hi Paul, On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:40:04AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I used xauth and xvfb as Build-Depends successfully which works on most > > architectures - but failed on these ones. Any hint how to solve this? > > If you don't