Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sponsor,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian GAP package gap-design [1,2]
which brings to Debian the GAP package DESIGN. It is a GAP package for
for constructing, classifying, partitioning and studying block
Hi Andreas,
On 12/14/2016 08:10 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:32:24AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> On 11/02/2016 05:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, was going to take a shot at debugging your segfault, but I
>> simply can't reproduce this:
>> ...
>>
On 14/12/2016 09:05, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2016, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Kyle Robbertze:
>>>
>>> two more points to be fixed:
>>>
>>> - you do not write "rm -f " in d/clean, just filenames/paths.
>>> See
>>> dh_clean(1)
>>>
>>> - metadata.json still says 3.22.2
>>>
>>
>> Both
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:32:24AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 05:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hmm, was going to take a shot at debugging your segfault, but I
> simply can't reproduce this:
> ...
> architectures.
Unfortunately autobuilders keep on reproducing
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:05:07 +0100
with message-id <1481699107.2883.2.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#847308: Bug#847076: ITP:
gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME
Shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #847308,
regarding RFS:
Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2016, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Kyle Robbertze:
> >
> > two more points to be fixed:
> >
> > - you do not write "rm -f " in d/clean, just filenames/paths.
> > See
> > dh_clean(1)
> >
> > - metadata.json still says 3.22.2
> >
>
> Both are now fixed
>
> Cheers
> Kyle
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:18:56PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> This reminds me of my remark in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847397#25
> from last Friday :)
+1
May be this workshop can be joined with "gdb for harmless Debian Med
packagers". ;-)
Kind regards
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sponsor,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian GAP package gap-toric [1,2]
which brings to Debian the GAP package Toric. It is a GAP package for
computing with toric varieties. This GAP package is preloaded by
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: cjwat...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: chinese-develop...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors and chinese-developer folks,
I am looking for a sponsor for the team package "manpages-zh".
* Package name:
I received reply from upstream, so now version is oficially 1.0.0. One
more review, please.
About d/watch -- seems I used old version of dh-make-elpa. Latest
version correctly creates d/watch with https:// links in both modes
(with and without --pkg-emacsen).
--
X-Web-Site:
On 11/02/2016 05:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Warning in rgl.init(initValue, onlyNULL) :
> RGL: unable to open X11 display
> Warning: 'rgl_init' failed, running with rgl.useNULL = TRUE
> Error: segfault from C stack overflow
Hmm, was going to take a shot at debugging your segfault, but I
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:51:36PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote:
There is no such package in the archive. Is this a new package? If yes,
please follow the procedures outlined at
https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for
Hello Boyuan
First of all, many thanks for taking care of shutter. That said, the patch you
propose to fix utf8 issue has a problem.
> +my $win_name = $win->get_name;
> +Encode::_utf8_on( $win_name );
> +my $window_item =
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the "inspircd" package, as I
> happen to be a member of the Debian IRC team but (still) lack upload
> permission to handle the RC bug it is currently affected with on my own.
On a second thought, I should have added a debdiff.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-debbugs-CC: pkg-irc-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the "inspircd" package, as I
happen to be a member of the Debian IRC team but (still) lack upload
permission to handle the RC bug it
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 05:55:14PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> it basically complains the python-requests could not be installed;
> however this package is available both in sid and testing (for more than
> 6 months without change), and manually installing python-pyvo also works
> on both
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:23:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I guess pabs meant that you're not actually using it in debian/rules.
> Urgs, thanks for opening my eyes. ;-)
:)
> Index: rules
> ===
> --- rules (Revision 23284)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 05:55:14PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I have a piuparts message that I don't understand:
>
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/python-pyvo_0.4.1+dfsg-1.log
>
> it basically complains the python-requests could not be installed;
> however this package is available
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:47:37 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So I did not yet considered this last resort and hope for some help from
> people who are more confident with gdb debugging than I am (Ive read
> here frequently some phrases like "10 minutes of gdb debugging" but I'm
> afraid it would
Hi,
I have a piuparts message that I don't understand:
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/python-pyvo_0.4.1+dfsg-1.log
it basically complains the python-requests could not be installed;
however this package is available both in sid and testing (for more than
6 months without change), and
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:30:00 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: stormlib/9.21-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #848035,
regarding RFS: stormlib/9.21-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:30:00 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-cartopy/0.14.2+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838495,
regarding RFS: python-cartopy/0.14.2+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-prov"
* Package name: python-prov
Version : 1.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Trung Dong Huynh
* URL : https://github.com/trungdong/prov
* License : Expat
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stormlib"
* Package name: stormlib
Version : 9.21-1
Upstream Author : Ladislav Zezula
* URL : http://www.zezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html
*
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:47:43AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> [..]
> > So what exactly do you mean by "didn't add it yet" ?
>
> I guess pabs meant that you're not actually using it in debian/rules.
Urgs, thanks for opening my eyes. ;-)
So I tried:
Index: rules
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
* Package name: cdist
Version : 4.4.0-1
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* Url :
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:30:41 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Well, adding xvfb was the usual trick to cope with "unable to open X11
> > > display" messages and thus I added it ...
> > To me it looks like you didn't add it yet, at least not to the version
> > in Debian.
> Hmmm,
> $ apt-get
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 03:50:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Well, adding xvfb was the usual trick to cope with "unable to open X11
> > display" messages and thus I added it ...
>
> To me it looks like you didn't add it yet, at least
On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 12:52 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> hopefully somebody from your team will pick it up, but
> I already trust you enough to sponsor this package
Thank you.
> compat level is 10 now (debhelper >=10)
I found the debhelper compatibility transition note on
manpage
Thanks, uploaded.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:17:32 +0500
with message-id <20161213081732.obhz44kqcdarr...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#848014: RFS: gap-laguna/3.7.0+ds-1 [ITP] LAGUNA GAP
package
has caused the Debian Bug report #848014,
regarding RFS: gap-laguna/3.7.0+ds-1 [ITP] LAGUNA
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sponsor,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian GAP package gap-laguna [1,2]
which brings to Debian the GAP package LAGUNA; LAGUNA stands for `Lie
AlGebras and UNits of group Algebras'. This GAP package is
32 matches
Mail list logo