Re: debian/watch: FTP with version encoded (only) in directory

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > How can I get this right? With just the ftp site alone it can't work (see below), luckily for you there is a github page: http://www.star.bristol.ac.uk/~mbt/stilts/#install https://github.com/Starlink/starjava/releases So this monstrosity

Bug#840750: RFS: picocoin/0.1-2.gbp43047g

Expanding on the previous feedback (from a quick review): You should clear all of the non-green issues on the [mentors page]. Note that debuild includes a lintian run. changelog: - The NMU complaint is there because your names in control and changelog don't match. control - You should

Bug#849844: RFS: manpages-zh/1.6.0-1

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello Boyuan, On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:54:15AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > 在 2017年1月2日星期一 SGT 下午12:23:49，Sean Whitton 写道： > > debian/ is not part of the upstream code, so changes should be listed in > > d/changelog. Other Debian contributors should be able to quickly

Bug#850318: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/12.2-1)

Your message dated Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:20:57 +0100 with message-id <11db3133-aaa5-ec8c-ddda-6bfb8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#850318: RFS: pentobi/12.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #850318, regarding RFS: pentobi/12.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#849918: marked as done (RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:11:33 +0100 with message-id <1483657893.13501.1.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #849918, regarding RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#850318: RFS: pentobi/12.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi". Package name: pentobi Version : 12.2-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL : http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL-3.0+ Section

Bug#847101: kimchi source updated

I've uploaded new packaging to fix some warnings: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kimchi/kimchi_2.3.1-1.dsc Regards, -- Lucio Correia

Bug#836382: marked as done (RFS: paflib/0.3.0-1)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:31:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: paflib/0.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #836382, regarding RFS: paflib/0.3.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#848384: marked as done (RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-20000911-7 [RC] [ITA])

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:31:16 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-2911-7 [RC] [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #848384, regarding RFS: xmacro/0.3pre-2911-7 [RC] [ITA] to be marked as done. This means

debian/watch: FTP with version encoded (only) in directory

Hi, I have the following sample download URL ftp://andromeda.star.bris.ac.uk/pub/star/stilts/v3.0-9/stilts_src.zip Corresponding Debian version number should be 3.0.9. I tried version=3 options="uversionmangle=s/\-/./,filenamemangle=s/\/$/.zip/" \

Bug#847102: ginger source updated

I've uploaded a new source package fixing warnings: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ginger/ginger_2.3.1-1.dsc Regards, -- Lucio Correia

Bug#847108: ginger-base source updated

I've uploaded a new package fixing DTD warning. dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ginger-base/ginger-base_2.2.2-1.dsc Regards, -- Lucio Correia

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > BTW, you're using the tar.gz .. Can you use the tar.bz2 for the > packaging as it compresses better? This is also the one that is picked > up by uscan... (Just use uscan --force-download to get

Bug#842041: RFS: highlighterpdf/0.7-1 [ ITP]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo The source tarball contains just .jar. It needs to contain the sources and tools to build those sources into the .jar. Packaging problems: You shouldn't put random numbers into Closes: in the changelog entry, you need to open the ITP bug and use its number there. The

Bug#840750: RFS: picocoin/0.1-2.gbp43047g

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo The package has lots of lintian warnings, please fix them first. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#842166: marked as done (RFS: findent-2.7.3-1 [ITP] -- indent / convert Fortran source)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:56:55 +0500 with message-id <20170105105655.xpdzv6k2vibvh...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request has caused the Debian Bug report #842166, regarding RFS: findent-2.7.3-1 [ITP] -- indent / convert Fortran source to be

Bug#850193: marked as done (RFS: forge/0.9.2-2)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:56:20 + (UTC) with message-id <159502895.187713.1483610180...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#850193: RFS: forge/0.9.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #850193, regarding RFS: forge/0.9.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that