Bug#850648: Missing source of manual-031.pdf

control: tags -1 moreinfo On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:29:04 -0500 Doug Torrance wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 01/09/2017 06:26 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > to my understanding manual-031.pdf will be considered as "binary without > > source" and thus rejected by ftpmaster. The

Bug#850664: RFS: python-pynzb/0.1.0-3

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Hi Sean, Thanks for your review! The Python 2 module can still be built fine, but I removed it since there were no rdeps. As in my reponse to your other RFS, I'd like to confirm that this is DPMT policy. I don't think that it's a team policy specifically, I was

Bug#850607: RFS: flask-login/0.4.0-1 [ITA]

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Hi Sean, Thanks for your interest in flask-login! > Can a potential sponsor work out of your Vcs-Git repository? The Python modules team has a standard location for git repositories on alioth so that's where I've kept it. Commit access is automatic for all DDs and

Bug#850187: marked as done (RFS: cid/8.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2017 04:26:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: cid/8.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #850187, regarding RFS: cid/8.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#835141: marked as done (RFS: telegram-purple/1.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Purple plugin to support Telegram)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2017 04:26:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: telegram-purple/1.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Purple plugin to support Telegram has caused the Debian Bug report #835141, regarding RFS: telegram-purple/1.3.0-1 [ITP] --

Bug#850757: marked as done (RFS: mytop/1.9.1-4)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:55:53 -0700 with message-id <20170110035553.hisz4ooik6xgv...@hephaestus.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#850757: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #850757, regarding RFS: mytop/1.9.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#850664: RFS: python-pynzb/0.1.0-3

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Carl, On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:51PM +1100, Carl Suster wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-pynzb" Thank you for your interest! > The Python 2 module can still be built fine, but I removed it since > there were no rdeps. As in my

Bug#850607: RFS: flask-login/0.4.0-1 [ITA]

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Carl, On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:38:27PM +1100, Carl Suster wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-login" Thank you for your work to revitalise the package. > To be clear I am not targeting stretch even if that's somehow possible at this >

Bug#849318: RFS: eoconv/1.5-1

Dear Andreas, On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 02:42:42PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Your changes looks fine and I can sponsor them for you if you wish > but have some questions for you below first. This RFS has been waiting on your response for a few weeks now, and winter is coming. Are you

Bug#848133: marked as done (RFS: rdup/1.1.15-0.1)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:23:31 -0700 with message-id <20170110032331.mfn5z5tpwys6a...@hephaestus.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#848133: RFS: rdup/1.1.15-1.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #848133, regarding RFS: rdup/1.1.15-0.1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#850704: fortune-zh: please make the build reproducible

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 17:38 +, Chris Lamb wrote: > lumin wrote: > > > Trying to upload package to ftp-master (ftp.upload.debian.org) > Checking signature on .changes > > Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org): >   Uploading fortune-zh_2.1_all.deb: done. >   Uploading

Bug#850670: RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP]

It's only because mentors doesn't support version=4. That's right - I tested the watch files for all of my packages and they work fine locally. For rpyc I chose GitHub rather than PyPI as the upstream tarball source since the former includes the tests and such, however there was a

Re: Bug#850757: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-4

Hi, > debdiff attached [1] fixed one more comment, Debdiff attached. Thanks, Werner werner@debian:~$ debdiff mytop_1.9.1-3.dsc mytop_1.9.1-4.dsc diff -Nru mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog --- mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog2016-11-20 10:31:06.0 +0100

Bug#850757: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-4

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mytop" * Package name: mytop Version : 1.9.1-4 Upstream Author : Jeremy D. Zawodny , Mark Grennan * URL

Bug#848426: marked as done (RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.1.2+ds1-1 [ITP][experimental])

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:11:01 + (UTC) with message-id <924674120.2665125.1483989061...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#848426: RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.1.2+ds1-1 [ITP][experimental] has caused the Debian Bug report #848426, regarding RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.1.2+ds1-1

Bug#848496: marked as done (RFS: libopenshot/0.1.2+ds1-1 [ITP][experimental])

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:08:37 + (UTC) with message-id <1371177924.2699467.1483988917...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#848496: RFS: libopenshot/0.1.2+ds1-1 [ITP][experimental] has caused the Debian Bug report #848496, regarding RFS: libopenshot/0.1.2+ds1-1

Bug#850704: fortune-zh: please make the build reproducible

lumin wrote: > Control: block -1 by 850704 > > Fixed in 2.1 . Waiting for sponsor now. Many thanks! Trying to upload package to ftp-master (ftp.upload.debian.org) Checking signature on .changes Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org): Uploading fortune-zh_2.1_all.deb:

Bug#850706: marked as done (RFS: libdebug/0.5.2-1 (new upstream release, packaging updates))

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:58:32 + (UTC) with message-id <643201752.2424866.1483981112...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#850706: RFS: libdebug/0.5.2-1 (new upstream release, packaging updates) has caused the Debian Bug report #850706, regarding RFS: libdebug/0.5.2-1 (new

Re: How can I get my watch file macros working?

Figured it out! The ':' character was literal. So now I have this working: .*ru[tT]orrent@ANY_VERSION@@ARCHIVE_EXT@ https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Common_mistakes gave me the idea On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Taylor Kline wrote: > My debian/watch file is not

Re: How can I get my watch file macros working?

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:13:01AM -0500, Taylor Kline wrote: > I would think this should match the website which has hrefs such as: > ruTorrent-3.7.zip > rutorrent-3.6.tar.gz It doesn't. > rel="nofollow">ruTorrent-3.7.zip As you can see here or by looking at the page source yourself, the href

How can I get my watch file macros working?

My debian/watch file is not matching anything, and I'm not sure why. Here's the file: version=4 https://dl.bintray.com/novik65/generic/ ru[tT]orrent@ANY_VERSION@@ARCHIVE_EXT I would think this should match the website which has hrefs such as: ruTorrent-3.7.zip rutorrent-3.6.tar.gz

Bug#850704: marked as done (RFS: fortune-zh/2.1)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:45:14 +0100 with message-id <20170109144514.5kb67n7vcxgyl...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#850704: RFS: fortune-zh/2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #850704, regarding RFS: fortune-zh/2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth > it so no. upload can be stacked, which means it's able to upload a new version while it's in NEW queue. though it seems it missed Stretch ...

Bug#850706: RFS: libdebug/0.5.2-1 (new upstream release, packaging updates)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new upstream version of my package "libdebug": * Package name: libdebug Version : 0.5.2-1 Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev * URL :

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

Hi, >The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth >it so no. you can still clone/reassign/retitle this bug to make it an ITP :) G.

Bug#850704: RFS: fortune-zh/2.1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: la...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: 073p...@gmail.com   Dear mentors,   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"  * Package name: fortune-zh    Version : 2.1    Upstream Author : myself  * URL : [fill

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:50:24PM +0100, Willem Vermin wrote: > Ok, I will not do that next time. > Do you require any action from me with regards to the package findent? The package is already in NEW and I don't think uploading a fix is worth it so no. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description:

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

Ok, I will not do that next time. Do you require any action from me with regards to the package findent? On 01/07/2017 02:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Unfortunately I didn't check that before uploading but you didn't open an ITP bug and used the RFS bug number in the changelog instead.

Re: Bug#841185: RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.17-1 [ITP #826774]

Hello. I have just uploaded a new version of genwqe-user to mentors. dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/genwqe-user/genwqe-user_4.0.18-1.dsc On 10/18/2016 11:42 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Fernando Seiti Furusato

Bug#850650: marked as done (RFS: restic/0.3.3-1)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:17:02 +0100 with message-id <20170109121702.53m5js6m5abdv...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#850650: RFS: restic/0.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #850650, regarding RFS: restic/0.3.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#850648: Missing source of manual-031.pdf

Hi Andreas, On 01/09/2017 06:26 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: to my understanding manual-031.pdf will be considered as "binary without source" and thus rejected by ftpmaster. The best way to solve this would be to ask upstream for the source files - the second best using Files-Excluded to remove

Bug#850648: Missing source of manual-031.pdf

Hi Doug, to my understanding manual-031.pdf will be considered as "binary without source" and thus rejected by ftpmaster. The best way to solve this would be to ask upstream for the source files - the second best using Files-Excluded to remove the PDF from the source tarball. Kind regards

Bug#850670: RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP]

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:52:39AM +0100, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > According to mentors.debian.net, your debian/watch is not working. It's only because mentors doesn't support version=4. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#850670: RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP]

Hey Carl, Glad to see you working on flexget again! This package looks good in general. According to mentors.debian.net, your debian/watch is not working. Replace it with the standard one and it should work fine: http://pypi.debian.net/rpyc/watch .hc

Bug#850678: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-show-ip/4.0.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-show-ip" * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-show-ip Version : 4.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze * URL :

Bug#850670: RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 850097 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rpyc" Package name: rpyc Version : 3.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Tomer Filiba URL :