Bug#850648: Missing source of manual-031.pdf

2017-01-15 Thread Doug Torrance
Hi Andreas, On 01/09/2017 06:26 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: to my understanding manual-031.pdf will be considered as "binary without source" and thus rejected by ftpmaster. The best way to solve this would be to ask upstream for the source files - the second best using Files-Excluded to remove

Bug#844184: RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]

2017-01-15 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Dear Sean, Thank you again for your patience and extra help! On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 05:51:09PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Ah! Yes, this is the spec that addresses my question to #3. That > > said, in the past some of my other work on d/copyright has been said > > to be "worse than

Re: What GPU can be assumed for autopkgtests

2017-01-15 Thread Nicholas Breen
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:21:57AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I remember these messages in connection with some (other?) package on > > autobuilders but I can't make up my mind which one and I'm obviously > > doing the wrong web search

Re: What GPU can be assumed for autopkgtests

2017-01-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I remember these messages in connection with some (other?) package on > autobuilders but I can't make up my mind which one and I'm obviously > doing the wrong web search queries. I don't know enough about OpenMPI and the logs you posted

Bug#844184: RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]

2017-01-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Nicholas, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:51:24PM -0700, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 07:45:18AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > I found some more errors in the copyright file. Rather than go back and > > forth once again, I fixed them in our team git repository. I set the

Bug#844184: RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]

2017-01-15 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Sean, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 07:45:18AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I found some more errors in the copyright file. Rather than go back and > forth once again, I fixed them in our team git repository. I set the > changelog back to UNRELEASED: if you are okay with the changes, please > `dch

Re: How can a package (r-bioc-rbgl_1.48.1+dfsg-1) be deleted from mentors

2017-01-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Christopher, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 05:24:27PM +, Christopher Hoskin wrote: > That's odd - I got a message (below) last year saying it had been > removed. It no longer appears in my list when I log into mentors, so > it's not obvious to me how I could delete it. I confirm its odd but its

Re: How can a package (r-bioc-rbgl_1.48.1+dfsg-1) be deleted from mentors

2017-01-15 Thread Christopher Hoskin
Dear Andreas, That's odd - I got a message (below) last year saying it had been removed. It no longer appears in my list when I log into mentors, so it's not obvious to me how I could delete it. Christopher Delivered-To: christopher.hos...@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.34.169 with SMTP id

How can a package (r-bioc-rbgl_1.48.1+dfsg-1) be deleted from mentors

2017-01-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, r-bioc-rbgl_1.48.1+dfsg-1 was uploaded for sponsoring to new which I did. Before it got accepted it was overridden by version 1.50.0+dfsg1-1 by myself as team upload to new which is now in unstable. Unfortunately the old version keeps on hanging on mentors and makes constant noise on my

Re: What GPU can be assumed for autopkgtests

2017-01-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 09:17:27PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > It is unlikely any buildd, puiparts host or debci host has a GPU. > Often they are virtual machines with only serial console for input if > any. So the safe bet for OpenCL is the CPU-based ICD, pocl-opencl-icd. OK, seems

Bug#844184: RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]

2017-01-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Nicholas, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 09:04:28PM -0700, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > I think it's finally ready. I found some more errors in the copyright file. Rather than go back and forth once again, I fixed them in our team git repository. I set the changelog back to UNRELEASED: if you are

Re: What GPU can be assumed for autopkgtests

2017-01-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Is there any hint how this test can be run on the autopkgtest > hardware? It is unlikely any buildd, puiparts host or debci host has a GPU. Often they are virtual machines with only serial console for input if any. So the safe bet for

What GPU can be assumed for autopkgtests

2017-01-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, the log from phyml autopkgtest[1] says: ... beignet-opencl-icd: no supported GPU found, this is probably the wrong opencl-icd package for this hardware (If you have multiple ICDs installed and OpenCL works, you can ignore this message) OpenCL error: CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND from file , line

Bug#851367: marked as done (RFS/ITP: python-scandir/1.4-1)

2017-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2017 12:27:35 +0100 with message-id <20170115112734.l6ocoais3zh2o...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#851367: RFS/ITP: python-scandir/1.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #851367, regarding RFS/ITP: python-scandir/1.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#851367: RFS/ITP: python-scandir/1.4-1

2017-01-15 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, On 15/01/2017 10:55, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:00:42PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-scandir" o/

Bug#851367: RFS/ITP: python-scandir/1.4-1

2017-01-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:00:42PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-scandir" o/ > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-scandir.git d/control: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10),

Bug#851367: RFS/ITP: python-scandir/1.4-1

2017-01-15 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, On 14/01/2017 17:35, Adam Borowski wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:00:42PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-scandir" * Package name: python-scandir python-scandir - Backport of the "scandir" stdlib module (Python 2) I got the

FTBFS in jellyfish trying to move strangely named shared library jellyfish.so.0.0.0U which does not exist

2017-01-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I intended to upgrade jellyfish[1] to make sure autopkgtest will run. When trying to build I've got a strange new FTBFS: libtool: install: ranlib /build/jellyfish-2.2.6/debian/tmp/usr/lib/perl/5.24.0/jellyfish.a libtool: warning: remember to run 'libtool --finish /usr/lib/perl/5.24.0' mv: