Bug#851606: marked as done (RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:27:33 +0100 with message-id <20170215012733.gq27...@sym.noone.org> and subject line Re: Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #851606, regarding RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#855171: RFS: tlf/1.3.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tlf" Package name: tlf Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Ervin Hegedus URL : www.hs-mittweida.de/tb/tlf-1.3.0.tar.gz License : GPL-2+

Bug#832941: marked as done (RFS: 4pane/4.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:25:25 -0700 with message-id <20170214212525.ie33h6gqaxsfy...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Closing inactive RFS has caused the Debian Bug report #832941, regarding RFS: 4pane/4.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#854807: RFS: smplayer/17.2.0~ds0-1

On 13.02.2017 17:33 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: missing copyrights, outdated copyright years Ori Rejwan + * Copyright (c) 2004-2013 Sergey Lyubka + * Copyright (c) 2013-2015 Cesanta Software Limited + * Copyright (c) 2016 Cesanta Software Limited Eike Hein Christian

Re: About jar of sources

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:31:58PM +0100, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > in my attempt to package sbt, I have a multi components debian source > package. One of this upstream source tarball provides a source jar file, > which will be used to produce a jar file later on by the build process. > Is it

About jar of sources

Hi, in my attempt to package sbt, I have a multi components debian source package. One of this upstream source tarball provides a source jar file, which will be used to produce a jar file later on by the build process. Is it possible to add this file in debian/copyright ? or do I have to extract

Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]

On 14/02/17 18:56, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Carlos Maddela wrote: >> Thanks for your suggestions. I have made the fixes and re-uploaded the >> source files as the same version (since it still has yet to be >> officially released) to mentors. I have applied for access to >> collab-maint

Bug#854933: RFS: synergy/1.4.16-2

On 13 February 2017 at 02:31, Joshua Honeycutt wrote: > > As I understood it and James pointed out we can go ahead with the > upload if everything looks alright. Once all the autobuilders complete > I will file the bug for migration. Uploaded, thanks.

Bug#854933: marked as done (RFS: synergy/1.4.16-2)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:24:01 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#854933: RFS: synergy/1.4.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #854933, regarding RFS: synergy/1.4.16-2 to be marked as done. This

Bug#840739: RFS: gudhi/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP]

On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 20:47:07 CET Gard Spreemann wrote: > On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > > - have separated -doc package > > The documentation shipped with upstream's source is rather > limited. They instead ship a dedicated tarball for

Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]

Hi, Carlos Maddela wrote: > Thanks for your suggestions. I have made the fixes and re-uploaded the > source files as the same version (since it still has yet to be > officially released) to mentors. I have applied for access to > collab-maint (just a few minutes ago), so I probably won't be able