Re: Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

hi Svante, I could not find the xpdf upstream developer pages. Your message here: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Svante Signell wrote: And FYI: Quoting from upstream, sent to me yesterday: Regarding security bugs, I try to respond to those as quickly as possible. gives the impression that there is

Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane

Dear David, On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:10:26PM +, David Hart wrote: > I've uploaded a +dfsg tarball to the 4Pane website and altered d/watch to > download it. uscan and lintian seem happy, so hopefully I've done this > correctly. This won't work because your changelog still has 4.0-1 as the

Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane

Dear Sean, >I've just reviewed revision 5e12184 of your packaging repository, and >compared it against the points of my previous review. I'm happy to see >that almost everything was handled. I also built and installed the >package and tried out 4Pane. > >There are two remaining issues. > >1)

Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 12:48 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Dear Svante, > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:55:18AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > I still don't get it. The proposed package _doesn't_ depend on poppler any > > more. > > If you have problems with previous xpdf+poppler versions up to

Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

Dear Svante, On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:55:18AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > I still don't get it. The proposed package _doesn't_ depend on poppler any > more. > If you have problems with previous xpdf+poppler versions up to 3.04-4, remove > these from the archive then! I don't see how we

Bug#856910: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-3

Hello Dmitry, On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:46:43AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > I need help with this. If I write > > embedded-javascript-library usr/share/doc/libinotifytools0-dev/jquery.js > > into debian/libinotify0-dev.lintian-overrides, it does not match and lintian > complains about

Bug#855439: RFS: cvm/0.97

Dear Dmitry, On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:46:37AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > control: tag -1 -moreinfo > > [2017-03-06 20:54] Sean Whitton > > Dear Dmitry, > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:23:46AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > Note, that this is not

Bug#857154: marked as done (RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-2)

Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:12:26 -0300 with message-id <226c1036-662d-f2e8-2865-ababc0106...@br.ibm.com> and subject line Re: RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #857154, regarding RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#857033: RFS: golang-github-xtaci-smux/1.0.4+git20170307+ds-1~exp1 [ITP] -- Simple Multiplexing for golang

control: close -1 >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-xtaci-smux". >Previous upload was rejected by ftpmaster, with following comment: both done, the kcptun was missing an "help2man" build dependency. (attached the new debian directory, not sure if I dcutted in time the

Bug#857053: RFS: kcptun/20170303+ds-1~exp1 [ITP] -- Simple UDP Tunnel Based On KCP

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcptun" first you need to fix golang-github-xtaci-smux and remove moreinfo tag G.

Bug#857131: RFS: fgrun/2016.4.0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

On 03/08/2017 02:29 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I understand that tarballs are important and could greatly reduce extra works. Well, it's relatively trivial to assemble a tarball. So I think of it more as a sign of upstream's quality awareness (or lack thereof). But well... > Fgrun is really

Re: Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:10 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2017-03-08 at 07:59, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 07:41 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > > > > > On 2017-03-08 at 00:55, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > I still don't get it. The proposed package _doesn't_ depend on > > >

Bug#857131: RFS: fgrun/2016.4.0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org 在 2017年3月8日星期三 SGT 下午1:06:02，Markus Wanner 写道： > I kind of allow developers to out-source that task (i.e. to github) and > only provide tags. Unfortunately, I didn't find a similar solution with > Sourceforge, yet. (It seems it's all there, but

Bug#857154: RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "genwqe-user" * Package name: genwqe-user Version : 4.0.18-2 Upstream Author : Frank Haverkamp * URL : https://github.com/ibm-genwqe/genwqe-user * License :

Re: Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

On 2017-03-08 at 07:59, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 07:41 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2017-03-08 at 00:55, Svante Signell wrote: >>> I still don't get it. The proposed package _doesn't_ depend on >>> poppler any more. If you have problems with previous >>> xpdf+poppler

Re: Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 07:41 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2017-03-08 at 00:55, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 22:43 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:17:08AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > > > I don't see where your concerns

Re: Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

On 2017-03-08 at 00:55, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 22:43 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:17:08AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: >> >>> I don't see where your concerns regarding security are, please >>> explain. >> >> Your package can't enter

Bug#857131: [pkg-fgfs-crew] Bug#857131: RFS: fgrun/2016.4.0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

Hello Boyuan, thanks for your efforts. On 03/08/2017 11:53 AM, Boyuan Yang wrote: > * For new d/watch file: I had a hard time making decisions and finally chose > the > sf.net redirector provided by qa.d.o, which points to flightgear *main* > project > tarballs. The lack of an upstream

Bug#857131: RFS: fgrun/2016.4.0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors and pkg-fgfs-crew maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "fgrun" into Unstable, perhaps into DELAYED/7 or DELAYED/10. * Package name: fgrun Version

Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.0.4.real-4

On Sat, 2017-03-04 at 13:56 -0600, Jason Crain wrote: > On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 07:28:37PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-03-04 at 09:46 -0600, Jason Crain wrote: > > > The upstream xpdf source contains a file misc/hello.pdf for testing > > > purposes, according to the INSTALL file.