Bug#857864: RFS: libmseed/2.19.2 [ITP: Bug#851806]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I hopefully already found a sponsor 'Andreas Tille' for this package, I should have already done this RFS. It builds those binary packages: libmseed2, libmseed-dev and libmseed-doc. It's intended to read/write Seed (basicaly a

Bug#857856: RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-2.2 [RC, NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "gmrun". * Package name: gmrun Version : 0.9.2-2.2 Upstream Author : Mihai Bazon * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/gmrun/ * License

Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Sigrok RFSs

Andreas Tille writes: > BTW, Bdale, by wearing your technical committee hat... You do recall that I'm not actually on the technical committee any more, right? I "timed out" due to the term limits GR at the end of 2015. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#856827: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8.1-2 [RC]

Dear Jeroen, On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 09:04:07PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > I gave it version -2 because I initially had uploaded a -1 version to > mentors. There were some lintian warnings and I fixed those, that's why I > bumped the version to -2. If it is a problem I can change it back

Re: Sigrok RFSs

Hi Zoltan, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:32:36PM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: > Please see my comments inline, Sure. What else. :-P > Yes, i would be happy to push my listed git repos to a team VCS, and > thank you for the > offering the sponsoration although before we go any further (mainly to

Re: Sigrok RFSs

Dear Andreas & All, Please see my comments inline, On 03/15/2017 09:28 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:35:47AM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: >>> I agree that if there is a pkg-electronics team that is fine for me. >>> What would be not fine is if this team is

Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane

Dear Sean, >Hopefully a final review (of b74e630): >- your copyright on debian/ is out-of-date -- you need s/2016/2017/ >By the way, you can merge the '*' and 'debian/*' stanzas. Done >- Various stanzas do not include the copyright years, yet these are > available in the files. The

Bug#857706: RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-homedecor/0.4.15-1

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:33:49AM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-homedecor" o/ > Vcs-Git: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-homedecor.git % cat

Bug#857705: marked as done (RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-craftguide/1.0-1)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:49:45 +0100 with message-id <20170315094944.gsy2ondejdrqd...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#857705: RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-craftguide/1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #857705, regarding RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-craftguide/1.0-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#857704: marked as done (RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-unifieddyes/0.4.15-1)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:44:28 +0100 with message-id <20170315094427.lkuwqszrh4u32...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#857704: RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-unifieddyes/0.4.15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #857704, regarding RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-unifieddyes/0.4.15-1 to be marked

Re: Sigrok RFSs

Hi Zoltan, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:35:47AM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: > > I agree that if there is a pkg-electronics team that is fine for me. > > What would be not fine is if this team is not updating the electronics > > task of Debian Science. Please make sure that all relevant packages

Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Sigrok RFSs

Hi Bdale, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:33:48PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > What would be not fine is if this team is not updating the electronics > > task of Debian Science. > > FWIW, I had no idea such a thing even existed. FWIW, I had no idea that a pkg-electronics team existed. ;-) Good we