Bug#862507: marked as done (RFS: pybind11/2.1.0-1 [experimental])

2017-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2017 06:19:29 + (UTC) with message-id <413002550.1912201.1494829169...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#862507: RFS: pybind11/2.1.0-1 [experimental] has caused the Debian Bug report #862507, regarding RFS: pybind11/2.1.0-1 [experimental] to be marked as do

Bug#862583: marked as done (RFS: reprozip/1.0.9-3 [RC])

2017-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2017 06:12:23 + (UTC) with message-id <1080424133.1923729.1494828743...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#862583: RFS: reprozip/1.0.9-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #862583, regarding RFS: reprozip/1.0.9-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#861699: RFS: writegood-mode/2.0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-05-14 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
control: tag -1 -moreinfo On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:02:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:58:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "writegood-mode" > > a5b0ac4 looks good,

Bug#861699: RFS: writegood-mode/2.0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-05-14 Thread Sean Whitton
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:58:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "writegood-mode" a5b0ac4 looks good, except I think you should install the README, which could be quite useful to users. If you're able to

Bug#862583: RFS: reprozip/1.0.9-3 [RC]

2017-05-14 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: reprozip   Version : 1.0.9   Upstream Author : Remi Rampin * URL : https://www.reprozip.org/ * License : BSD   Section : scie

Bug#862293: marked as done (RFS: xtensor-python/0.11.0-1)

2017-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2017 10:22:22 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: xtensor-python/0.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862293, regarding RFS: xtensor-python/0.11.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#833193: RFS: chapel/1.15-1 [ITP]

2017-05-14 Thread lumin
On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 20:41 +, Ben Albrecht wrote: > > We understand that Debian plans to upgrade to Python 3. We're not > intending to install user-visible Python scripts or modules. The > Python code that we use is used internally by our compiler and build > scripts. In this case, is it nece