Bug#854938: marked as done (RFS: wxmaxima/16.12.2-2)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:28:51 +0100 with message-id <20170602052851.3elrzu6wk32lw...@zephyr.silentflame.com> and subject line Closing inactive RFSs has caused the Debian Bug report #854938, regarding RFS: wxmaxima/16.12.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#851799: marked as done (RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:28:51 +0100 with message-id <20170602052851.3elrzu6wk32lw...@zephyr.silentflame.com> and subject line Closing inactive RFSs has caused the Debian Bug report #851799, regarding RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#851762: marked as done (RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU])

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:28:51 +0100 with message-id <20170602052851.3elrzu6wk32lw...@zephyr.silentflame.com> and subject line Closing inactive RFSs has caused the Debian Bug report #851799, regarding RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#850670: marked as done (RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2017 04:26:51 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #850670, regarding RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#848327: Bug#824532: [Pkg-auth-maintainers] Bug#848327: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.3-1

Am 02.06.2017 um 00:13 schrieb Nicolas Braud-Santoni: > Since no other workable solutions were proposed, and since Michael made it > clear > that this is not baggage he would carry in udev, I updated the proposed > upload: > >

Bug#863432: marked as done (RFS: bluemon/1.4-7 [QA-Upload])

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:35:00 +0200 with message-id <20170601233500.ltq3s54zsj3lj...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#863432: RFS: bluemon/1.4-7 [QA-Upload] has caused the Debian Bug report #863432, regarding RFS: bluemon/1.4-7 [QA-Upload] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#863894: marked as done (RFS: groonga/7.0.3-1)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:08:08 +0200 with message-id <20170601230808.zbznqrtwtgrjw...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#863894: RFS: groonga/7.0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #863894, regarding RFS: groonga/7.0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#848327: Bug#824532: [Pkg-auth-maintainers] Bug#848327: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.3-1

X-Debbugs-CC: sramac...@debian.org Hi, On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > To make this perfectly clear (again): I, as udev/systemd maintainer, > object to maintaining that u2f udev rule as a downstream patch in udev > and I will remove that patch from src:systemd

Bug#859778: [supp...@mentors.debian.net: xtrs uploaded to mentors.debian.net]

package sponsorship-requests tag 859778 - moreinfo thanks $ dput mentors xtrs_4.9d-1_amd64.changes Checking signature on .changes gpg: /home/branden/src/GIT/debian/xtrs_4.9d-1_amd64.changes: Valid signature from D19E9C7D71266DCE Checking signature on .dsc gpg:

Bug#863894: RFS: groonga/7.0.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" for experimental * Package name: groonga Version : 7.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Groonga Project * Url : http://groonga.org/ *

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On June 1, 2017 6:13:06 PM GMT+08:00, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log: SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh >(exit status: 77) >No, it's a bad idea to do things requiring root during tests, >especially >modprobe/rmmod Maybe those tests can be run

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 06:07:40PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: > some tests are skipped, i feel they should run > > > perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo? > > UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log: + sudo -n dd bs=4096 count=1 if=/dev/zero > of=/tmp/usbguard_disk >

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to build using sbuild. FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1) some tests are skipped, i feel they should run perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hello On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: * New upstream version 0.7.0 This release contains a backwards incompatible change because it changes how the device hash is computed for Linux root hub devices How is it handled for users that already have a

Bug#863789: RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.8-1

control: close -1 Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logdata-anomaly-miner" I sponsored it in experimental (due to the freeze), but please: 1) drop the patch (python2.6 is dead now) I don't see lintian complains without that patch. (waiting eventually for a -2 in experimental :)