No worries on that. I will have to do some updating of the source code
to coincide with some protocol updates.
Thanks for your help and hope you can pick up some time after Summer.
On 06/29/2017 05:26 AM, David Steele wrote:
> First, I want to apologize for the latest delay in responding. I re
First, I want to apologize for the latest delay in responding. I remember being
on the waiting side of things, and am sorry I'm contributing to the problem.
Second, I want to let you know that I won't be able to get to this, for at
least till the end of summer. If someone else picks up sponsors
Hello
>Quick question. I can see the moka-icon-theme v5.6.1 source has
>entered the unstable archive - but I don't see the built binary
>
>(all.deb).
>http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/moka-icon-theme/
some autodecruft removed the binary because of slow builders
https://ftp-ma
yep, removing it
G.
Il Mercoledì 28 Giugno 2017 17:48, Jason Crain ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:15:20PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> /gexiv2_0.10.6-1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
> 9-day/libgexiv2-doc_0.10.6-1_all.deb
> Either you already uploaded it, or
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:15:20PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> /gexiv2_0.10.6-1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
> 9-day/libgexiv2-doc_0.10.6-1_all.deb
> Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
> Job gexiv2_0.10.6-1_amd64.changes removed.
>
> Greetings,
>
Hi Gianfranco,
many thanks for sponsoring this.
Quick question. I can see the moka-icon-theme v5.6.1 source has
entered the unstable archive - but I don't see the built binary
(_all.deb).
http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/moka-icon-theme/
Any idea where the binary has gone?
hurray!
>I didn't notice this when I ran the tests because I already have
>libexiv2-dev installed. I see now that I could have run the tests in an
>sbuild schroot.
another issue fixed by a good testsuite!
however not quite ready
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gexiv2/
On 2017-06-28 12:36, ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
#866046: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.19-0.1 NMU
It has been closed by Gianfranco Costamagna .
Hi Gianfranco,
I meant to write a short mail for this upload, but you found it
already...
Thanks for doing the reviews!
Thomas
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:33:50 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#866046: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.18-0.1 NMU
has caused the Debian Bug report #866046,
regarding RFS: libcgicc/3.2.19-0.1 NMU
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:24:49 + (UTC)
with message-id <1251265362.446923.1498645489...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#866199: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/3.0.7+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #866199,
regarding RFS: shadowsocks-libev/3.0.7+ds-1
to be marked as done.
T
Package: sponsorship-requests
X-Debbugs-CC: Roger Shimizu
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for co-maintained package "shadowsocks-libev".
* Package name: shadowsocks-libev
Version : 3.0.7+ds-1
Upstream Author : Max Lv
* URL : https://sha
11 matches
Mail list logo
