Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Hildred <426...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > > > The tuptime package have a cron file in it and I am thinking on > > replace it with a systemd timer unit. Paul Wise writes: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:53

Bug#870623: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/13.1-1)

2017-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:35:21 +0200 with message-id <20170803213521.amavoan5yvztt...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#870623: RFS: pentobi/13.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #870623, regarding RFS: pentobi/13.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:24:40AM -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote: > The Arch Wiki > > shows how you can integrate email notifications with .timer Yes, but Arch is systemd only, while Debian (thanks Eris!) is not.

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
this will change all the way whitin debian can be a unix like! its enought of systemd intrution! Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-08-03 14:24 GMT-04:00 Herminio Hernandez, Jr. < herminio.hernande...@gmail.com>: > The Arch Wiki >

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr.
The Arch Wiki shows how you can integrate email notifications with .timer On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > > > I like some

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Ben Hildred wrote: > You do realise that there are people who do not run systemd? They can use the cron job as usual. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > I like some aspects of the .timer, but I don't know if the change is a good > idea or not at this moment? There are any other package that has changed > from cron to .timer? What is the official recomendation? One significant difference

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Ben Hildred
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > Hi, > > > The tuptime package have a cron file in it and I am thinking on replace it > with a systemd timer unit. > > In the Debian Policy there are only references to cron, the same as in the > Developers Reference

Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Ricardo Fraile
Hi, The tuptime package have a cron file in it and I am thinking on replace it with a systemd timer unit. In the Debian Policy there are only references to cron, the same as in the Developers Reference Guide and Maintainer Guide. I like some aspects of the .timer, but I don't know if the

Bug#869898: marked as done (RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3+git20170731-1 [ITP])

2017-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Aug 2017 16:20:10 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3+git20170731-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #869898, regarding RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3+git20170731-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#870632: RFS: silan/0.3.3-1 [ITA] -- commandline tool to detect silence in audio-files

2017-08-03 Thread Kyle Robbertze
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "silan" * Package name: silan Version : 0.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Robin Gareus * URL : https://github.com/x42/silan/ * License :

Bug#870621: RFS: deepin-gettext-tools/1.0.6+git20170731-1 [ITP]

2017-08-03 Thread Liang Guo
Hi, I have a quick look of this package, this is my comment: * d/compat should be 10 * please ask upstrem to add license header to desktop_ts_convert.pl and policy_ts_convert.py * please fix binary-without-manpage lintian warning. Thanks, -- Liang Guo http://guoliang.me/

Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

2017-08-03 Thread Liang Guo
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to my understanding [1], this should be a recommendation and not a > requirement for using (L)GPL licenses. > > Anyway I prepared a new snapshot for dtkcore with upstream fixes: > > *

Bug#870623: RFS: pentobi/13.1-1

2017-08-03 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi". Package name: pentobi Version : 13.1-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL : https://pentobi.sourceforge.io/ License : GPL-3.0+ Section

Bug#870621: RFS: deepin-gettext-tools/1.0.6+git20170731-1 [ITP]

2017-08-03 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-deepin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org czc...@debian.org bluestonech...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-gettext-tools" * Package name: deepin-gettext-tools Version :

Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]

2017-08-03 Thread Boyuan Yang
在 2017年7月31日星期一 CST 下午1:00:02，Liang Guo 写道： > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure. I have reminded them of this issue. I will update debian/copyright > > file as soon as new upstream version (with fixes) gets released. My > > opinion is that this issue