On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:27:48AM +0800, Yanhao Mo wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dtkwidget"
* For debian/*.install, please use more specific name instead of lib*.so
to detect so bump from upstream.
* Some dependencies are missing? Maybe still in NEW queue? I can sponsor
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dav-text":
Package name: dav-text
Version: 0.8.6-1
Upstream Author: Adam Bilbrough
URL: https://gitlab.com/atsb/dav-text
License: GPLv2
Section: text
It builds
Control: retitle -1 RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1-1 [ITP]
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2017 21:34:46 +0200
with message-id <33647dcd-7f59-5e4b-fe56-d5ab2848a...@gmail.com>
and subject line Closing those RFS : I'm on another way to close the ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #872696,
regarding RFS: node-unicode-tr51/9.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2017 21:34:46 +0200
with message-id <33647dcd-7f59-5e4b-fe56-d5ab2848a...@gmail.com>
and subject line Closing those RFS : I'm on another way to close the ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #872700,
regarding RFS: node-unicode-10.0.0/0.7.4-1 ITP
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2017 21:34:46 +0200
with message-id <33647dcd-7f59-5e4b-fe56-d5ab2848a...@gmail.com>
and subject line Closing those RFS : I'm on another way to close the ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #872661,
regarding RFS: node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript/1.0.3-1
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2017 21:34:46 +0200
with message-id <33647dcd-7f59-5e4b-fe56-d5ab2848a...@gmail.com>
and subject line Closing those RFS : I'm on another way to close the ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #872657,
regarding RFS:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-regjsparser"
* Package name: node-regjsparser
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Julian Viereck and contributors
* URL :
Thanks.
Yes, Piotr answered me in the mean time.
Joseph
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Francois Gez wrote:
> I am honored to be in this list for so many years! Does it mean that I am a
> mentor and I did not know? I was be delighted to be of any help here.
This is the first mail from you on the debian-mentors list, I think to
be considered a
Ole Streicher:
> Hi Nils,
>
Hi,
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> Ole Streicher:
>>> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 08:42:37PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> The package is affected by the same issue that chocolate-doom was in the
>>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dtkwidget"
* Package name: dtkwidget
Version : 2.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co,. Ltd
* URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtkwidget.git
* License
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:06:00PM -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
>
> > https://pypi.debian.net/* sends back a "502 Bad Gateway
>
> I'd suggest contacting the maintainer of that service:
Well, it came back in the meantime.
--
regards,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:20:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have sponsored libmseed to new since you requested it via SoB.
There is no such package in NEW and in the archive.
Anyway, should this ITP be closed or updated?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The package FTBFS:
dh_install
dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "/usr/bin" (tried in ., debian/tmp)
dh_install: ddcutil missing files: /usr/bin
dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "/usr/share/man" (tried in .,
debian/tmp)
dh_install: ddcutil missing files: /usr/share/man
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> https://pypi.debian.net/* sends back a "502 Bad Gateway
I'd suggest contacting the maintainer of that service:
$ host -t txt pypi.debian.net | head -n1
pypi.debian.net descriptive text "Piotr O\197\188arowski "
$ finger
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The package builds only the py2 module. Instead it should build only the
py3 module, unless the py2 one is required by some other packages, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html
Priority should be optional.
Please update to the
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2017 19:24:28 +0500
with message-id <20170820142428.w2uqhwipyqili...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#872705: RFS: dblatex/0.3.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #872705,
regarding RFS: dblatex/0.3.10-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dblatex"
Package name: dblatex
Version : 0.3.10-2
Upstream Author : Benoît Guillon
URL : http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Ftbfs upstream use node unicode data
Le 20 août 2017 09:39:10 GMT+02:00, Julien Puydt a
écrit :
>Package: sponsorship-requests
>Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-tr51"
>
> *
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Upstream use node unicode data..
Thus ftbfs
Le 19 août 2017 23:09:42 GMT+02:00, Julien Puydt a
écrit :
>Package: sponsorship-requests
>Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org
Ftbfs upstream use unicode data and node-unicode-data
Le 20 août 2017 10:36:13 GMT+02:00, Julien Puydt a
écrit :
>Package: sponsorship-requests
>Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-10.0.0"
* Package name: node-unicode-10.0.0
Version : 0.7.4-1
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-tr51"
* Package name: node-unicode-tr51
Version : 9.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens
* URL : https://mths.be/unicode-tr51
* License
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 01:37:16AM +0200, Julian Winkler wrote:
> I just uploaded a new source package (0.1-2).
You shouldn't bump the debian revision for a package that wasn't uploaded
yet.
> But I don't know what's the problem about ignoring CPPFLAGS,
> because the source code is written in c
25 matches
Mail list logo