Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2017 22:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: openmeca/2.2.5-1 [ITP: #850590]
has caused the Debian Bug report #851936,
regarding RFS: openmeca/2.2.5-1 [ITP: #850590]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2017 22:17:01 +0200
with message-id <20170912201701.nqpjtxqbhehxo...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #875630,
regarding RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.8-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter"
* Package name: slick-greeter
Version : 1.0.8-2
Upstream Author : Clement Lefebvre
* URL :
This is a test after two of my mails have arrived here via BTS not correct.
Will a direct mail to the list appear here the same way.
Regards
Phil
--
*** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.***
Playing the game for the games sake.
Web: https://kathenas.org
Github:
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 22:12 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:37:10PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > The rednotebook upstream author added txt2tags.py and then GPL-2 license
> > data to
> > his project prior to the txt2tags author changing his licensing to GPL-2+.
> >
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:37:10PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> The rednotebook upstream author added txt2tags.py and then GPL-2 license data
> to
> his project prior to the txt2tags author changing his licensing to GPL-2+.
> This
> is why the data was bad in rednotebook. Updating (as done) to the
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 11:49 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:13:20AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > Why are you skipping tests?
>
> Hmm?
>
I reserve comment until I have sought and had feedback from elsewhere.
> > > It seems that the package combines incompatible
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 01:09:23 CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> d/copyright says "License: GPL-3" instead of GPL-3+.
> lib/pthread_barrier.h and m4/ax_pthread.m4 should have separate entries in
> d/copyright.
> Otherwise the package looks good.
For what it's worth, the issues you reported
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:13:20AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Why are you skipping tests?
Hmm?
> > It seems that the package combines incompatible licenses (GPL-2 and
> > GPL-3+)?
> To address the license issue. The upstream author used the file concerned
> prior
> to file being changed to
9 matches
Mail list logo