Re: Question about watch files

2017-10-06 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:29:56AM +0200, Sascha Manns wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Am Freitag, den 06.10.2017, 16:01 +1100 schrieb Ben Finney: > > Sascha Manns writes: > > You don't need to write it; UScan version 4 already knows a regex > > that > > matches the common version

Bug#877897: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-3

2017-10-06 Thread Phil Wyett
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 22:25 +0200, Gunter Königsmann wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am afraid this time I have made another bug in my package "wxmaxima" > and therefore kindly ask you to sponsor another upload. > >  * Package name: wxmaxima

Bug#877897: marked as done (RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-3)

2017-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 6 Oct 2017 22:37:40 +0200 with message-id <20171006203740.nqaqxlu37o56x...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#877897: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #877897, regarding RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#877897: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-3

2017-10-06 Thread Gunter Königsmann
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am afraid this time I have made another bug in my package "wxmaxima" and therefore kindly ask you to sponsor another upload. * Package name: wxmaxima Version : 17.10.0-3 Upstream Author : Andrej Vopodivec * URL

Bug#875265: RFS: rednotebook/2.3-1 [ITP] [ITA] -- A cross-platform journal

2017-10-06 Thread Phil Wyett
Hi, New version upload. Your upload of the package 'rednotebook' to mentors.debian.net was successful. Others can now see it. The URL of your package is: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rednotebook The respective dsc file can be found at:

Bug#876667: RFS: pragha/1.3.3-1

2017-10-06 Thread Breno Leitao
Hello Gabriel, On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:05:58PM +0200, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > it seems you are getting the knack of it quickly :) . I don't have > any additional feedback. I hope you're able to find a sponsor soon. I am just doing a final review for the sponsor, and I

Bug#877861: marked as done (RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-2)

2017-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:25:32 +0200 with message-id <20171006152532.scury422wbai2...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#877861: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #877861, regarding RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches > are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are > updated accordingly. > With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this

Bug#877610: RFS: libexif/0.6.21-2.1 [NMU]

2017-10-06 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Adam, On Friday, 6 October 2017 1:17 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > # Does your NMU really fix bugs? ("Bugs" means any kind of bugs, e.g. > # wishlist bugs for packaging a new upstream version, but care should be > # taken to minimize the impact to the maintainer.) Fixing cosmetic issues or > #

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-06 Thread Christian Göttsche
I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are updated accordingly. With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this package; what are the requirements for me to become such? Also, I like to ask

Re: Help with watchfile to Gitlab clone needed (Was: Source code of altree vanished)

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:59:30PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Any hint how to fix this? > > If you run uscan with --debug Nice hint! > (or look at the HTML) you can see that > the URLs are domain absolute rather than relative, so you

Re: Help with watchfile to Gitlab clone needed (Was: Source code of altree vanished)

2017-10-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Any hint how to fix this? If you run uscan with --debug (or look at the HTML) you can see that the URLs are domain absolute rather than relative, so you need to either add /NGS/ALTree/ or .*/ to the repository regex: version=4

Help with watchfile to Gitlab clone needed (Was: Source code of altree vanished)

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I migrated the altree package from SVN to Git[1]. I tried to adapt the suggested template for watch files to Gitlab to the gitlab instance running at inria.fr: $ cat debian/watch version=4 opts=filenamemangle=s/.*\.tar\.gz\?ref=v?(\d\S*)/ALTree-$1\.tar\.gz/g \

Bug#877861: RFS: wxmaxima/17.10.0-2

2017-10-06 Thread Gunter Königsmann
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, Sorry that I have to bother you again but I am again looking for a sponsor for my package "wxmaxima": This time I found a bug before anybody else did. * Package name: wxmaxima

Re: C++ help needed for new version of tifffile

2017-10-06 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2017-10-05 21:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> I migrated the Debian packaging of tifffile from SVN to Git[1]. After >> upgrading to the latest upstream version (dated 2017-09-14) I get: >> >> ... >>