Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Federico Brega wrote: > Is my proposal of adding a lintian override Ok? lintian is only for the situation where it the lintian complaint is not true. In this case, the problem is present so you should not override it. If you intend to ignore this problem, just

Bug#875919: irony-mode

2017-10-13 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Sarcasm/irony-mode/issues/443 server/run-clang-tidy.py is License: University of Illinois/NCSA I opened an upstream issue because I wasn't able to find a 100% match against any commit of:

Bug#861649: Newer version uploaded

2017-10-13 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi! On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote: > The package has now been updated to the latest upstream (2.0.1). > > It can be downloaded by > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc Before a human review, it'd be good to

Bug#878423: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.4+ds.1-1)

2017-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2017 23:50:00 +0200 with message-id <20171013215000.elvvaiald3yqi...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#878423: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.4+ds.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #878423, regarding RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.4+ds.1-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote: > > > the package contains an html file which uses Open Layers and has the > > option > > > to show the Google Maps tiles. This obviously involves using the Google > > > Maps service. The usage of this tile is explicitly described as

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Federico Brega
2017-10-13 22:14 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote: > > In the meantime lintian started to warn about a new > privacy-breach-generic: > It was there from the beginning though: >

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote: > In the meantime lintian started to warn about a new privacy-breach-generic: It was there from the beginning though: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2017/08/msg00048.html > the package contains an html file which uses Open

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Federico Brega
Hello, elyxer will be probabbly removed from Debian in the near future, so we cannot use it anymore to generate the user manual. In the RC3 of the package the html file is generated from a asciidoc file. In the meantime lintian started to warn about a new privacy-breach-generic: the package

Bug#878167: marked as done (RFS: cl-asdf/2:3.3.0-1 - Another System Definition Facility)

2017-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:21:00 +0200 with message-id <20171013172100.cbxkuagunhof6...@villemot.name> and subject line Re: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility has caused the Debian Bug report #878167, regarding RFS: cl-asdf/2:3.3.0-1 - Another System Definition

Bug#878167: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility

2017-10-13 Thread Kambiz Darabi
> Thanks. However it looks like you forgot to push the upstream branch > and the tags. Could you please do so? Done. > Since this is a package maintained by the Debian Common Lisp Team, > you should indeed write first to the list of the team, asking for sponsorship. > If the team is alive, that

Bug#878167: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility

2017-10-13 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Also, there is a GPG key under debian/upstream/signing-key.asc, but I see no signature on upstream website (https://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/archives/). Am I missing something? Or should the key be removed? Thanks, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀

Bug#878167: RFS: cl-asdf/3.3.0 - Another System Definition Facility

2017-10-13 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 07:10:09PM +0200, Kambiz Darabi wrote: > > > Could you please push your changes to the git repository for cl-asdf > > on alioth? > > I just pushed the changes and an additional one for fixing > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873035 > > which I had

Bug#878423: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.4+ds.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Tobias Winchen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" * Package name: engauge-digitizer Version : 10.4+ds.1-1 Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell * URL :

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:52:03AM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > >> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches > >> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are > >> updated accordingly. > >> With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-13 Thread Christian Göttsche
2017-10-06 15:00 GMT+02:00 Sven Hoexter : > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: >> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches >> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are >> updated accordingly.

Bug#861649: Newer version uploaded

2017-10-13 Thread Gard Spreemann
The package has now been updated to the latest upstream (2.0.1). It can be downloaded by dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc Regards, Gard Spreemann