Bug#879070: marked as done (RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+nmu1 [RC] [NMU])

Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:19:41 +0200 with message-id <20171018231941.f6z4yrubz2ccw...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#879070: RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+nmu1 [RC] [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #879070, regarding RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+nmu1 [RC] [NMU] to be

Bug#879068: marked as done (RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-3 -- locale helper tool)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:56:42 +0200 with message-id <20171018225642.7dadvhcmbekoo...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#879068: RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-3 -- locale helper tool has caused the Debian Bug report #879068, regarding RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-3 -- locale helper tool to be

Bug#878909: RFS: xabacus/8.1.3+dfsg1-1 [ITA]

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:05:41PM +0200, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > > > > The new version puts a helper script into $PATH: /usr/games/play.sh > > This doesn't look like a good place for a private helper. Its name > > is also pretty generic, not conflicting with other programs only > > because

Bug#879070: RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, Would any of you consider sponsoring this NMU I prepared? It's a targeted one- line fix for #868673 which makes it unusable in Stretch. If possible I'd also like it in stretch-proposed-updates, presumably only after it's reached

Bug#879068: RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-3 -- locale helper tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "localehelper" * Package name : localehelper Version : 0.1.4-3 Upstream Author : Jakub Wilk * URL :

Re: BTS and unreleased changelog entries

Ross Vandegrift writes: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:23:57AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > As someone who went looking for it recently when you didn't know the > > recommendation: Where exactly would you expect to find this > > information, which particular section of Policy

Re: BTS and unreleased changelog entries

Hi Ben - thanks fo the thorough explanation, much appreciated! On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:23:57AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > So now that we agree it's not too clear, and may be difficult to find, I > would welcome a bug report against Policy for clarifying this issue. > > As someone who went

strange alternate dependencies behaviour.

Hello, I would like to package a new boinc-virtualbox metapackage, that installs virtualbox and the extpack. Unfortunately the upstream vbox provides a virtualbox-5.0, virtualbox-5.1 or virtualbox-5.2 (provides virtualbox) and the debian one provides virtualbox, and nothing more (except from

Re: Package recommended and upgrade/dist-upgrade

Le 18/10/2017 à 07:57, Narcis Garcia a écrit : As Far As I Know: Not by default behaviour, but you can configure. APT parameter to override this: --with-new-pkgs Directive for /etc/apt/apt.conf : APT::Get::Upgrade-Allow-New Thanks for your quick answer. After a test, I can confirm that new