Bug#862875: marked as done (RFS: libzc/0.3.6-1 [ITP] -- fast zip cracking library)

Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:09:30 +0100 with message-id <20171031030930.gctevfilvbgmc...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#862875: RFS: libzc/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- fast zip cracking library has caused the Debian Bug report #862875, regarding RFS: libzc/0.3.6-1 [ITP] -- fast zip cracking

Bug#862115: marked as done (RFS: lr/1.1-1 [ITP] -- list files, recursively)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:20:09 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: lr/1.1-1 [ITP] -- list files, recursively has caused the Debian Bug report #862115, regarding RFS: lr/1.1-1 [ITP] -- list files, recursively to be marked as done.

Bug#880264: RFS: kconfig-frontends/4.11.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Standalone implementation of the Linux Kconfig parser and frontends

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kconfig-frontends" * Package name    : kconfig-frontends   Version : 4.11.0.1-1   Upstream Author : Yann Morin * URL : 

Bug#879720: RFS: runescape/0.2-1 [QA] -- Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world

> Uploaded! Many thanks for your contributions to Debian! Thank you very much for your instructions before loading the package. :D -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀   2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF  D35F

Bug#848327: marked as done (RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.4-1 [RC])

Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:22:31 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.4-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #848327, regarding RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.4-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#880007: marked as done (RFS: brightnessctl/0.3-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:22:29 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: brightnessctl/0.3-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #880007, regarding RFS: brightnessctl/0.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#862114: Bug#862115: RFS: xe/0.8-1 (ITP, #862114) & lr/0.4-1 (ITP, #862115)

On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 15:01 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Oh, I didn't realise this wasn't a person :O Yeah, it probably should migrate to mentors and a more obvious sender address. > I guess the obvious solution is for me to become a DD and sponsor uploads :P That would definitely

Bug#862114: Bug#862115: RFS: xe/0.8-1 (ITP, #862114) & lr/0.4-1 (ITP, #862115)

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:56:10PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > I appreciate that Bart was likely trying to triage RFSes, but closing it > > rather than asking to reupload to mentors.d.n feels somewhat unfriendly, > > especially when

Re: Comment posted on sqldeveloper-package

Hi, Phil. It'll be a lot of work, but I have to change my email address, I've been having problems with BigFoot service, and only yesterday noticed it was failed. Probably it doesn't matter who's name appears on the page as long as the package gets sponsored which, from my experience, isn't that

Bug#862114: Bug#862115: RFS: xe/0.8-1 (ITP, #862114) & lr/0.4-1 (ITP, #862115)

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > This RFS is a pretty good example: there was no new upstream version, and > no review (or any sort of activity on the RFS) since June, while the timeout > on mentors.debian.net is only 20 days. The best you can do in that situation

Bug#862114: Bug#862115: RFS: xe/0.8-1 (ITP, #862114) & lr/0.4-1 (ITP, #862115)

Hi pabs, On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 08:51:03PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Even if you haven't got a sponsor yet, RFS submitters should still be > maintaining the packages as they would if they were in the archive. > That means updating to new upstreams, fixing any review comments, > checking with

Bug#880168: marked as done (RFS: libu2f-server/1.0.1-4 [RC])

Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:07:30 +0100 with message-id <20171030130730.7gpcv24xlkichoez@bogus> and subject line Re: RFS: libu2f-server/1.0.1-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #880168, regarding RFS: libu2f-server/1.0.1-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#848327: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.4-1 [RC]

Control: tags -1 + pending This has been uploaded to NEW by jcc@ Thanks <3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#862115: Bug #862115: RFS: lr/0.4-1 [ITP] -- list files, recursively

Control: retitle -1 RFS: lr/1.1-1 [ITP] -- list files, recursively Upstream made a new release yesterday, so I updated the package. It is (again) on mentors.d.n and alioth. On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 12:17:00PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Control: retitle -1 Re: RFS: lr/1.0-1 [ITP] --

Re: Comment posted on sqldeveloper-package

Hello Lazarus, pleased to meet you. I attempted to get in touch with you over the summer, but unfortunately only got bounces from bigfoot.com. On 29 October 2017 at 22:57, mentors.debian.net wrote: > Lazarus Long made the following comment about the

Bug#848327: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.4-1 [RC]

X-Debbugs-CC: si...@josefsson.org, pkg-auth-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: reopen -1 = Control: retitle -1 RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.4-1 [RC] Control: severity -1 important Control: block 846358 by -1 Control: tags 846358 fixed pending Control: block 846359 by -1 Control: tags 846359

Bug#880168: RFS: libu2f-server/1.0.1-4 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: blocks 876580 by -1 Control: tags 876580 fixed pending X-Debbugs-CC: si...@josefsson.org, pkg-auth-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libu2f-server" * Package name:

Bug#879720: RFS: runescape/0.2-1 [QA] -- Multiplayer online game set in a fantasy world

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 10:24:29PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Em dom, 2017-10-29 às 15:30 +0100, Tobias Frost escreveu: > > Good! > > > > Sorry for bringing up another issue, but I completly missed that > > before: The Debian changelog's purpose is not to document changes made > > to