On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Janusz Dobrowolski wrote:
> This package was recently included in wheezy, but seems later was
> orphaned sometime back in 2013, and currently is absent from debian
> repositories. Now it is refreshed, and as one of upstream developers I'm
> ready to maintain it
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:18:22 +0100
with message-id <20171221001822.zqu2c3tqqk4w7...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#884884: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #884884,
regarding RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvdisaster"
* Package name: dvdisaster
Version : 0.79.6-1
Upstream Author : Carsten Gnörlich
* URL : http://dvdisaster.net/
*
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvdisaster"
* Package name: dvdisaster
Version : 0.79.5-4
Upstream Author : Carsten Gnörlich
* URL : http://dvdisaster.net/
*
Hello Chris.
Of course you are not hijacking a previous work mine. I guess this messages
are because I’ve submitted an ITA package updating the version of keychain.
I received a feedback of one Debian Mentor to do some changes in the package I
submitted and re-submit again, but I faced some
Your message dated Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:12:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sqlcl-package/0.1.0 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #882116,
regarding RFS: sqlcl-package/0.1.0 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
I'm trying to understand what this page is telling me:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/keychain
I'm trying to adopt keychain which was orphaned, I've ITA'd the ticket:
https://bugs.debian.org/867749
The mentors.d.n page, however, shows that Paulo Vital
is the "Uploader",
I was building my Docker image on top of ubuntu:16.04. Switching to
debian:latest fixed this. Oops!
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:33 PM, John Allwine wrote:
> Maybe I'm using an old version that doesn't pick that up? Or I'm not
> naming it correctly? Here's the script that I
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 4:44 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=freetype-config
> this is a big no-go, first, please ask Steve to review, but I would assume
> this patch
> is wrong, because a lot of packages are right now calling freetype-config in
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 2:47 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hmm, there are two RC bugs on the package, but you're not fixing either of
> them. Instead, you fix wishlist wontfix bugs.
One of the RC bugs is tagged 'wontfix' -- and that is also upstream's response.
I've had a look at the second
10 matches
Mail list logo