Bug#884816: RFS: frontaccounting/2.4.3-1 [ITA]

2017-12-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Janusz Dobrowolski wrote: > This package was recently included in wheezy, but seems later was > orphaned sometime back in 2013, and currently is absent from debian > repositories. Now it is refreshed, and as one of upstream developers I'm > ready to maintain it

Bug#884884: marked as done (RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-4)

2017-12-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:18:22 +0100 with message-id <20171221001822.zqu2c3tqqk4w7...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#884884: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #884884, regarding RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#884885: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.6-1

2017-12-20 Thread Carlos Maddela
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvdisaster" * Package name: dvdisaster Version : 0.79.6-1 Upstream Author : Carsten Gnörlich * URL : http://dvdisaster.net/ *

Bug#884884: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-4

2017-12-20 Thread Carlos Maddela
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvdisaster" * Package name: dvdisaster Version : 0.79.5-4 Upstream Author : Carsten Gnörlich * URL : http://dvdisaster.net/ *

Re: mentors.d.n thinks someone else uploaded my package?

2017-12-20 Thread Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital
Hello Chris. Of course you are not hijacking a previous work mine. I guess this messages are because I’ve submitted an ITA package updating the version of keychain. I received a feedback of one Debian Mentor to do some changes in the package I submitted and re-submit again, but I faced some

Bug#882116: marked as done (RFS: sqlcl-package/0.1.0 [ITP])

2017-12-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:12:54 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sqlcl-package/0.1.0 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #882116, regarding RFS: sqlcl-package/0.1.0 [ITP] to be marked as done.

mentors.d.n thinks someone else uploaded my package?

2017-12-20 Thread Chris West
I'm trying to understand what this page is telling me: https://mentors.debian.net/package/keychain I'm trying to adopt keychain which was orphaned, I've ITA'd the ticket: https://bugs.debian.org/867749 The mentors.d.n page, however, shows that Paulo Vital is the "Uploader",

Bug#884651: RFS: stlcmd/1.0-1 [ITP]

2017-12-20 Thread John Allwine
I was building my Docker image on top of ubuntu:16.04. Switching to debian:latest fixed this. Oops! On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:33 PM, John Allwine wrote: > Maybe I'm using an old version that doesn't pick that up? Or I'm not > naming it correctly? Here's the script that I

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-20 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 4:44 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=freetype-config > this is a big no-go, first, please ask Steve to review, but I would assume > this patch > is wrong, because a lot of packages are right now calling freetype-config in

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-20 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 2:47 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hmm, there are two RC bugs on the package, but you're not fixing either of > them.  Instead, you fix wishlist wontfix bugs. One of the RC bugs is tagged 'wontfix' -- and that is also upstream's response. I've had a look at the second