Re: Built-Using usage question

Paul Wise writes: > Personally, I feel this change to policy is a mistake. Alternative proposals that achieve the goal of not adding Built-Using fields to the entire archive are welcome. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Re: Built-Using usage question

Lukas Schwaighofer writes: > The syslinux-efi binary package contains parts of the gnu-efi package > due to static linking. I believe that, independent of the license > question, in order to satisfy DFSG §2 (“The program must include source > code, […]”) I need to keep

Re: Built-Using usage question

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: > I read the update in policy 4.1.3 and I'm not sure how to handle the > change / clarification of the Built-Using control field for the > syslinux package (which I maintain in the debian-cd team). I suggest you ask this question on the

Bug#885715: RFS: libt3highlight/0.4.5-1 [ITP] -- Syntax highlighting library

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:43:56PM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libt3highlight". This is one > of the dependencies for the Tilde text editor (#692512). > > * Package name: libt3highlight >Version : 0.4.5-1 > It builds those binary

Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]

Le 31/12/2017 à 02:04, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 22:04 +0100, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.9.0+dfsg.2-3.dsc > > Uploaded to NEW, thanks a lot for your contribution, it saved me from > having yet another package

Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]

On Sun, 2017-12-31 at 02:28 +0100, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > The upload failed because the orig tarball was not included maybe > because its -3 ? Right, I forgot to include the orig tarball manually. Done now. > The changes since version 0.8.1-2 should be included too I guess as this > one has

Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 22:04 +0100, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.9.0+dfsg.2-3.dsc Uploaded to NEW, thanks a lot for your contribution, it saved me from having yet another package removed from Debian on my system :) -- bye, pabs

Bug#885711: RFS: libt3window/0.2.5-1 [ITP] -- Library for creating window-based terminal programs

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 09:43:53AM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote: > In the meantime there was a new release of the upstream package, to fix a > bug. I've updated the package to the next version (0.2.6). When using dget, > please use the following command: > > dget-x \ >

Bug#849691: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-radio/8-1 [ITP] -- GNOME shell

extension for listening to Internet radio streams To: 849...@bugs.debian.org Just uploaded a new version of the package, fixing the Vcs-Browser url.

Bug#878268: RFS: streamlink/0.9.0-1 [ITP]

Le 30/12/2017 à 02:35, Paul Wise a écrit : > > No, I would suggest to set the binary package version for livestreamer > only, that way you can drop the transitional package after buster > without having to keep the epoch around forever. You can set the > binary package version by passing the -v

Bug#882438: marked as done (RFS: libt3config/0.2.11-1 ITP#882376)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:46:14 +0100 with message-id <20171230204614.c4vpzuokevem7...@angband.pl> and subject line libt3config: uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #882438, regarding RFS: libt3config/0.2.11-1 ITP#882376 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#885710: RFS: libt3key/0.2.7-1 ITP #885595

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:30:46PM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libt3key". This is one of > the dependencies of the Tilde text editor (#692512). > > * Package name: libt3key >Version : 0.2.7-1 > It builds those binary packages: > >

Bug#884780: RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 07:24:54PM +0300, Ivan wrote: > Think i've fixed a multiplayer, i've tested it on debian <--> ubuntu and > it's working. Good to hear. > And i've send a 'reportbug wnpp' but haven't got its number yet. There might be sometimes a delay of an hour or so. If you waited

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging

On Saturday, December 30 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 30 Dec 2017, Ben Finney wrote: > >>"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" writes: >> >>> Not really. If I understood it correctly, anonscm.debian.org is >>> alioth, which was being decomissioned when I started to work on

Bug#884780: RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi! Thank you for your help, Adam. Think i've fixed a multiplayer, i've tested it on debian <--> ubuntu and it's working. And i've send a 'reportbug wnpp' but haven't got its number yet. Am i understand this right that i need to put this number to debian/changelog? Or just send it?

Built-Using usage question

Hi mentors, I read the update in policy 4.1.3 and I'm not sure how to handle the change / clarification of the Built-Using control field for the syslinux package (which I maintain in the debian-cd team). I have two questions: The syslinux-efi binary package contains parts of the gnu-efi package

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging (was: Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA])

On 30 Dec 2017, Ben Finney wrote: >"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" writes: > >> Not really. If I understood it correctly, anonscm.debian.org is >> alioth, which was being decomissioned when I started to work on >> this. > >The name ‘anonscm.debian.org’ was explicitly det up

Bug#885711: RFS: libt3window/0.2.5-1 [ITP] -- Library for creating window-based terminal programs

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:35:03 +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote: >Package: sponsorship-requests >Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] > >Dear mentors, > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libt3window". This is one of >the dependencies for the