Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcc" * Package name: pcc Version : 1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 Upstream Author : Anders Magnusson <ra...@ludd.ltu.se> * URL : http://pcc.ludd.lt

Bug#887660: RFS: minidb/2.0.2-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + moreinfo I intend to sponsor this because the urlwatch RFS needs it. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Maxime Werlen wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidb" In future, I'd recommend using the BTS block command when filing an RFS that

Bug#868488: marked as done (RFS: sokochez/0.6.2-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 05:21:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sokochez/0.6.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #868488, regarding RFS: sokochez/0.6.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#887854: marked as done (RFS: fet/5.35.1-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Sat, 20 Jan 2018 23:11:48 +0100 with message-id <20180120221148.hwhlj3u7xc56g...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887854: RFS: fet/5.35.1-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #887854, regarding RFS: fet/5.35.1-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#887853: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-gui/0.26.2-1)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Jan 2018 22:46:13 +0100 with message-id <20180120214613.euodx5qgd55pr...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887853: RFS: gnustep-gui/0.26.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887853, regarding RFS: gnustep-gui/0.26.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: ddcutil-0.8.6-1

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 10:51:14AM -0500, Sanford Rockowitz wrote: > I have uploaded the latest point release of ddcutil, 0.8.6,  to > debian-mentors, closing bug 887770. Thank you, uploaded. > I've also CC'd the mentors list.  For future reference is this the best way > to signal a new version?

Bug#887854: RFS: fet/5.35.1-1 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fet" * Package name: fet Version : 5.35.1-1 Upstream Author : [Lalescu Liviu * URL : http://www.lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/ * License

Bug#887853: RFS: gnustep-gui/0.26.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-gui". * Package name: gnustep-gui Version : 0.26.2-1 Upstream Author : Fred Kiefer , Adam Fedor ,

Bug#887728: RFS: nvidia-cudnn/7.0.5~cuda9.0-1 [ITP / ppc64el help needed]

quickly checked this since I was on plummer anyway for CUDA 9.1 ... On 2018-01-19 13:58, Lumin wrote: > 1. build on ppc64el to see if the rules is working for ppc64el Works fine. > 2. update *.symbols.ppc64el, stripping the debian revision. No differences to the amd64 symbols -> rename to

ddcutil-0.8.6-1

Andrey, I have uploaded the latest point release of ddcutil, 0.8.6,  to debian-mentors, closing bug 887770. I've also CC'd the mentors list.  For future reference is this the best way to signal a new version? Regards, Sanford

Bug#887839: RFS: udftools/2.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools" * Package name: udftools Version : 2.0-1 Upstream Author : Pali Rohár * URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools * License

Bug#887659: RFS: urlwatch/2.7-1 [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + moreinfo I intend to sponsor this. On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 21:42:33 +0100 Maxime Werlen wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch" These issues block the upload of this package: The package FTBFS in a clean chroot, you need to package