Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2018-03-01 4:37 GMT+08:00 Tobias Frost : > Hi Yangfl, > > the package has now been accepted. > However, I noticed that it targets "experimental", something I missed > in the last review. Can you prepare another upload for unstable? > > And please tag the release on salsa! TIA! > >

Bug#891813: RFS: i2pd/2.18.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i2pd" * Package name: i2pd Version : 2.18.0-1 Upstream Author : R4SAS * URL : https://github.com/PurpleI2P/i2pd * License : BSD Section :

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

On 02/27/2018 12:02 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: Hi, just to avoid a dead-lock: you're still working on the package, nothing to review atm? Just let us know (and remove the moreinfo tag as sign) when ready for the next round of review. (I'd like to avoid reviewing when not everything has been

Bug#891811: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid": * Package name: hoteldruid Version : 2.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis * URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com * License : AGPLv3

Bug#861649: Newer version uploaded

On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 22:26:58 CET Tobias Frost wrote: > Ok, it builds now. > But there are tons of lintian warnings "privacy-break-generic", just > one example: Not checked, but maybe some template for the doc > generation has a link to this site? > > […] > > There are other lintian

Bug#881946: RFS: keychain/2.8.4+dfsg-1 [ITA]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo I did a very quick but incomplete check on the package: - there are many lintian messages (some warnings) - d/compat is 9, should be bumped. - Uploaders: Ondřej Surý ... undocumented in the changelog. (I assume Ondřej wants to be uploader, doesn't

Bug#891643: I'd appreciate if you could also give me upload rights for this package.

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:27:37PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > } I am looking for a sponsor for package "inkscape-open-symbols". > > > I'd appreciate if you could also give me upload rights for this package. > That is documented at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer Yes, that implies

Bug#884697: RFS: logrotate/3.13.0-1 ITA

Ping...

Bug#891244: closing 891244

close 891244 thanks

Bug#891244: RFS: gnumail/1.2.2-1.1+deb9u1 [RC] [stable]

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 20:39:33 +0200 Yavor Doganov wrote: > Yavor Doganov wrote: > > * Package name: gnumail > >Version : 1.2.2-1.1+deb9u1 > > Forgot to mention the release.d.o bug: #886636 > > Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution to Debian! -- tobi

Bug#861649: Newer version uploaded

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 11:07:40 +0100 Gard Spreemann wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > On Tuesday 26 December 2017 21:58:36 CET Tobias Frost wrote: > > I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled... > > Please check and then remove

Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Yangfl, the package has now been accepted. However, I noticed that it targets "experimental", something I missed in the last review. Can you prepare another upload for unstable? And please tag the release on salsa! TIA! -- tobi

Bug#887403: marked as done (RFS: budgie-extras/0.4.2-1)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:21:27 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: budgie-extras/0.4.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887403, regarding RFS: budgie-extras/0.4.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

[2018-02-28 10:21] Ansgar Burchardt > Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > > I think there is nothing to worry about :) > > > > this is the path: > > /usr/lib/*/diet/*/libgdbm.a > > It is a problem as the package might provide different functionality > when someone else builds and

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Gianfranco Costamagna writes: >>This means building the package will give different results depending >>on dietlibc-dev installed or not? That shouldn't happen... >> >>Please check via some other means that a build using dietlibc has been >>requested; don't do different things just because a