Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:32:59 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ccrypt/1.10-5 [ITA] -- secure encryption and
decryption of files and streams
has caused the Debian Bug report #892483,
regarding RFS: ccrypt/1.10-5 [ITA] --
Preparing the package in pkg-security team.
--
Alexander Kulak
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hmmm, what about something that looks at the headers?
This is possible in theory although it looks complex, fragile and
insufficient to me. It would help library maintainers to detect API
breaks and subsequently ABI breaks (at least one source for them), but
I can't see how it
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:04:01 +0100
with message-id <48439641-2674-a2f4-d876-a8634b665...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: New version
has caused the Debian Bug report #891005,
regarding RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:59:45 +0100
with message-id
and subject line RFS: dh-sysuser/1.3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #892581,
regarding RFS: dh-sysuser/1.3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:00:48 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: dh-runit/2.7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #892634,
regarding RFS: dh-runit/2.7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Because of the dynamic nature of the language this information is not
> available at build time.
Hmmm, what about something that looks at the headers?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:50:29 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Subject: RFS: diodon/1.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #892660,
regarding RFS: diodon/1.8.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:45:53 +0100
with message-id <4676bf78-236b-51e7-5e88-2c4a1789c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.23.2-1 -- Pidgin plugin for Skype for
Business and Microsoft Lync
has caused the Debian Bug report #892619,
regarding RFS:
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> Is there any possibility of renaming this directory to deepin-manual
> or deepin-manuals (if deepin-manual is already taken by the
> deepin-manual package)? I think dman is too generic and likely to be
> confused for something related to man-db.
I agree here
G.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openbox"
* Package name: openbox
Version : 3.6.1-7
Upstream Author : 2003-2011, Dana Jansens
* URL : openbox.org
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer"
* Package name: smplayer
Version : 18.2.2~ds0-1
Upstream Author : Ricardo Villalba
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacefm"
* Package name: spacefm
Version : 1.0.6-1
Upstream Author : IgnorantGuru
* URL :
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > If -initWithAddressBook:readOnly: is removed in a new version of the
> > library, that's an API/ABI break but again, it won't be reflected in
> > the symbols table. In a C/C++ library you'll see a symbol
> > disappearing
14 matches
Mail list logo