Bug#892591: RFS: pinball/0.3.1-14 [ITA]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 09:16:13AM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote: > * Package name: pinball >Version : 0.3.1-14 > Changes since the last upload: > > * New Maintainer (Closes: #891762). > * Set Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets. > * Added homepage field on

Bug#892383: marked as done (RFS: librime/1.2.10+dfsg2-1)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:54:22 +0100 with message-id <20180316005407.6o3qqvtgfn652...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#892383: RFS: librime/1.2.10+dfsg2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #892383, regarding RFS: librime/1.2.10+dfsg2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#891065: marked as done (RFS: gntp-send/0.3.4-2)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:27:47 +0100 with message-id <20180316002741.2crjudul3jjhn...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#891065: RFS: gntp-send/0.3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #891065, regarding RFS: gntp-send/0.3.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#890214: RFS: opencc/1.0.5-1

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > * Package name: opencc >Version : 1.0.5-1 > Git packaging repository: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ime/opencc.git > > (Yes, I'm also looking for a DD to move opencc git repository onto >

Bug#892187: marked as done (RFS: libtoxcore/0.2.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:15:52 +0100 with message-id <20180315231551.y5xzllvbefqph...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#892187: RFS: libtoxcore/0.2.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #892187, regarding RFS: libtoxcore/0.2.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#893021: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-1)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:32:51 +0100 with message-id <20180315223251.i7dwio6ip25yg...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#893021: RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #893021, regarding RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#892987: marked as done (RFS: libt3key/0.2.9-1)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:31:12 +0100 with message-id <20180315223112.uuai2dbjaqpil...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#892987: RFS: libt3key/0.2.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #892987, regarding RFS: libt3key/0.2.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#893052: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-1 [I maintain the package]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfsmaintenance". Hi Sven, I've CCed you because you have consistently sponsored this package :-) Package name: btrfsmaintenance Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : David

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > What is still missing from my side is a complete d/copyright review, > but I need a break right now... Will continue later. Ok, went over the package for a copyright review. One part of the result resulted in a MR [1], but not all

Bug#892725: marked as done (RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-1)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:29:06 +0200 with message-id <20180315212906.GD9516@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#892725: RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #892725, regarding RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#876152: marked as done (RFS: luakit/2017.08.10-1)

merge 876152 890346 stop -- DAVID Grégory Libre Software Developer d...@groolot.net https://framagit.org/groolot https://github.com/groolot signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#876152: Acknowledgement (RFS: luakit/2017.08.10-1)

owner 876152 ! -- DAVID Grégory Libre Software Developer d...@groolot.net https://framagit.org/groolot https://github.com/groolot signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#876152: marked as done (RFS: luakit/2017.08.10-1)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:41:06 +0100 with message-id <20180315184106.x3dnoogywig2j...@groolot.net> and subject line Close and merge with #890346 has caused the Debian Bug report #876152, regarding RFS: luakit/2017.08.10-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#893021: RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.4-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-admin" * Package name: nautilus-admin Version : 1.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Bruno Nova * URL :

Bug#876152: Acknowledgement (RFS: luakit/2017.08.10-1)

owner 876152 groo...@groolot.net stop -- DAVID Grégory Libre Software Developer d...@groolot.net https://framagit.org/groolot https://github.com/groolot signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#891843: marked as done (RFS: libhinawa/0.8.2-2)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:33:48 +0100 with message-id <8dda9fbb-a3f0-3ca9-fcbe-2df149bd6...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#891843: RFS: libhinawa/0.8.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #891843, regarding RFS: libhinawa/0.8.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: moving teams to salsa

hello, thanks you all! I already read all the docs, will do the migration :) G. Il Giovedì 15 Marzo 2018 15:39, Joseph Herlant ha scritto: Hi, > Is anybody willing to point me some wiki and help in doing the migration? Once you've read Paul and Mattia's docs

Re: moving teams to salsa

Hi, > Is anybody willing to point me some wiki and help in doing the migration? Once you've read Paul and Mattia's docs (which will give you all the needed informations) you can read how https://salsa.debian.org/mehdi/salsa-scripts works (in its README) to help an easier migration. Joseph

Bug#890573: RFS: fcitx-qt5/1.2.2-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > I am looking for a sponsor for team package "fcitx-qt5": why can't people on the team process this one? the packaging looks good, but not being part of the team, makes things harder for me G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#890756: RFS: youtube-dl/2018.01.27/1.1 [NMU] -- downloader of videos from YouTube and other sites

Hello, >All that being said, I will upload a new version of youtube-dl during the >next few days... do you have any update? thanks Gianfranco

Re: piuparts - installation and purging test

Hello, >I am maintaining vim-lastplace. A few days ago I saw on my Debian >Maintainer Dashboard that piuparts was failing at the installation and >purging test. Today I wanted to fix this, but the message was gone. So >piuparts now succeeds on piuparts.d.o . > >But when I run piuparts on my local

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

>> "libqt5core5a (<<5.10)" this will make it uninstallable when 5.10 goes in >> unstable... >> isn't it better to just make it compatible with new qt stack? I don't want >> to make qt folks >> sad. >hm, maybe i'm misunderstanding the problem, but i thought the applet >only works with the qt

Bug#892567: marked as done (RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-1 [RC])

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:54:38 + (UTC) with message-id <2007999891.1696902.1521118478...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#892567: RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #892567, regarding RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-1 [RC] to be marked as

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hi, On 03/15/2018 01:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, >> Thanks, i've added some commits and specified the qt version and pushed >> everything to salsa. > > > please also address the stuff on RFS bug i already pushed those changes a few weeks ago ;) > and... > --with=autoreconf >

Bug#892067: marked as done (RFS: vnstat/1.18-1)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:32:44 +0100 with message-id <813714dd-5022-1715-626a-b018ae261...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: vnstat/1.18-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #892067, regarding RFS: vnstat/1.18-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hello, >Thanks, i've added some commits and specified the qt version and pushed >everything to salsa. please also address the stuff on RFS bug and... --with=autoreconf isn't this useless too? "libqt5core5a (<<5.10)" this will make it uninstallable when 5.10 goes in unstable... isn't it better

Some questions regarding packaging of bolt

Hello debian-mentors, i'm in the process of packaging 'bolt', the thunderbolt 3 device manager. I've pushed the current state of the package to salsa [0]. There are still some lintian warnings about missing copyright informations, but those are about manpage files, dockerfiles,

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hi, On 03/15/2018 10:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > >> there is a bug with severity: grave in usbguard, because of a libqt5 >> version incompatibility (#892045) and there is already a new version of >> usbguard waiting to be sponsored. Should i fix the bug in the new >> version

Bug#849754: RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.0-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hello, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "guerillabackup" I would really like to see the package working, but I see the upstream repo is lacking the history, this makes the Debian work less efficient in cherry-picking new stuff. Two

Re: moving teams to salsa

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:44:16AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) I can't create new teams teams are created through signup.salsa.d.o > 2) I don't know how to move the lists See https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/#Mailing_lists > 3) I lack the time to find/look for the documentation (and

Re: moving teams to salsa

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Is anybody willing to point me some wiki https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/AliothMigration -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

moving teams to salsa

Hello Mentors list, I would like to move pkg-boinc and pkg-virtualbox teams to salsa, problem is: 1) I can't create new teams 2) I don't know how to move the lists 3) I lack the time to find/look for the documentation (and I lost it) 4) I need some "import git repo" link, because uploading a git

Bug#890847: marked as done (RFS: iotjs/1.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:20:23 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: iotjs/1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #890847, regarding RFS: iotjs/1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#892992: RFS: xtables-addons/3.0-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xtables-addons" * Package name: xtables-addons Version : 3.0-0.1 Upstream Author : Jan Engelhardt * URL :

Bug#892725: RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-1

On 13.03.2018 22:25 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:58:19AM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: ... Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. (Closes: #892054) + Drop all patches included upstream. *

Bug#890270: marked as done (RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.18.0-1)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:59:01 + (UTC) with message-id <1192341882.1453269.1521107941...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#890270: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.18.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890270, regarding RFS:

Bug#887665: marked as done (RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1)

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo 1) please fix the qt bug in this upload 2) missing lots of copyrights, e.g. src/ThirdParty/Catch/* src/ThirdParty/PEGTL/* do you need such external libraries? why aren't it packaged separately? 3) std-version is 4.1.3 4) dh ${@} --parallel

Re: Bug with sev: grave while new package waiting

Hello, >there is a bug with severity: grave in usbguard, because of a libqt5 >version incompatibility (#892045) and there is already a new version of >usbguard waiting to be sponsored. Should i fix the bug in the new >version or should i fix it in the version thats already in the archive? I'm

Bug#892987: RFS: libt3key/0.2.9-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libt3key" * Package name: libt3key Version : 0.2.9-1 Upstream Author : Gertjan Halkes * URL : https://os.ghalkes.nl/t3/libt3key.html *

Bug#883384: RFS: deepin-deb-installer/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:40:55 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > same dman directory, same reviews as previous packages needs fixing, lintian > is complaining a lot >

Bug#883379: RFS: deepin-voice-recorder/1.3.6-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 - moreinfo After discussing with the upstream, they decide to refactor their manual system and before that they agree to remove it for the time being. (and patch 0001 is now useless) Uploaded.