Bug#898528: Acknowledgement (RFS: FVWM/1:2.6.7-4 -- F? Virtual Window Manger)

Update: pabs in #debian-mentors suggested I rebase the package off of the git master branch due to the number of patches (since many of them had been applied upstream). Following the suggestion I created a new package with version 1:2.6.7-47-ge760d90a-1 that is based off the current master branch

Bug#898528: RFS: FVWM/1:2.6.7-4 -- F? Virtual Window Manger

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello mentors, I am looking for a new sponsor for the package fvwm I am maintaining. My current sponsor has not been able to find the time to properly review the updated package. The package can be found at http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm-2.6.7/ Here

Bug#898507: RFS: node-policyfile/0.0.6-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-policyfile" * Package name: node-policyfile Version : 0.0.6-1 Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-policyfile - Flash Socket Policy File

Bug#898484: [cdlumin...@gmail.com: RFS: nltk/3.3.0]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk": * Package name: nltk Version : 3.3.0 Upstream Author : NLTK project * URL : https://www.nltk.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : science

Bug#898242: marked as done (RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.3-1)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2018 10:20:19 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #898242, regarding RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#897238: RFS: intel-mkl/2018.2.199-1 -- ready for review

Hello Mentors and Science Team, The existing problems previously existing in the package have been resolved. See the following threads for discussion about the decisions related to debconf: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897238