Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2018 04:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: arc/5.21q-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #895681,
regarding RFS: arc/5.21q-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi Ferenc,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 09:56:17AM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Lumin writes:
>
> > The problem is, if I maintain the two releases in parallel, the
> > dch would become a mess when moving the 1.0 release to sid.
> > dch will contain duplicated changelog entries (e.g. fixing
> >
[ Resend for the record with the lists below ]
+ debian-backports@l.d.o
+ pkg-gnupg-maint@l.alioth.d.o
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Jacob Adams wrote:
> control: tag -1 -moreinfo
>
> On Sep 1, 2018, at 04:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Dear Jacob,
>
> On Fri, May
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:02:14AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Chris Lamb writes:
>
> > * You should probably avoid building the documentation too if the
> >nodocs build profile is enabled.
>
> For packages from PyPI which have documentation detectable by
> ‘dh_sphinxdoc’, does this (avoid
Hi David Mohammed,
I am giving you budgie-desktop upload permission.
Regards,
Herver
> On Sep 1, 2018, at 12:45, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> I compiled this pkg under stretch, and meet the following error.
>
>
> cJSON.c:45:20: fatal error: gpgrt.h: No such file or directory
> # include
>^
>
>
> I see you updated libgpg-error to 1.29, so I tried to
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2018 16:35:47 -0400
with message-id <2514666.cL2jRCi8Kn@hosiet-mi>
and subject line Re: Bug#906719: RFS: rpyc/4.0.2-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #906719,
regarding RFS: rpyc/4.0.2-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
retitle 897072 RFS: btrfs-progs/4.17-1~bpo9+1
stop
Hi Gianfranco!
I noticed that this RFS bug has been open since 4.15.1-2~bpo9+1
(April). Are there any problems with the package I haven't addressed?
Upstream has recently started grumbling again about ancient Debian
packages ;-)
Future
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Sven and mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfsmaintenance"
Package name: btrfsmaintenance
Version : 0.4.1-3
URL : https://github.com/kdave/btrfsmaintenance
License : GPL-2
It builds this
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Jacob Adams wrote:
> control: tag -1 -moreinfo
>
> On Sep 1, 2018, at 04:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Dear Jacob,
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Jacob Adams wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
>
> Severity: normal
>
>
>
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2018 00:46:58 +0900
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#897045: RFS: libgpg-error/1.29-4~bpo9+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #897045,
regarding RFS: libgpg-error/1.29-4~bpo9+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
control: tag -1 -moreinfo
> On Sep 1, 2018, at 04:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Dear Jacob,
>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Jacob Adams wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Jacob,
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Jacob Adams wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpgme1.0"
Thanks for your interest in contribution to debian!
> Changes since the
13 matches
Mail list logo
