Bug#926306: RFS: socklog/2.1.0-9

2019-04-12 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-04-10 12:46] Mathieu Mirmont > > Are you sure you need "Depends: runit"? Maybe it is just me, but I > > thought that `socklog' is just an implementation of `syslog'. If > > so, hard dependency on bin:runit is quite heavyweight. > > It heavily relies on runsv and svlogd, that's how it

Bug#926306: RFS: socklog/2.1.0-9

2019-04-12 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-04-10 23:48] Mathieu Mirmont > > part 1 text/plain 434 > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:20:30AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > You can repack it as new upstream version. New version would be > > something like `2.1.0+repack-1'. Do not forget add clarification into > >

Bug#926915: RFS: fossology/3.5.0-1 [ITP] -- OSS license compliance tool

2019-04-12 Thread Mishra, Gaurav
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fossology" Package name: fossology Version : 3.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Michael C. Jaeger URL : https://fossology.org License : GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1 Section

Bug#926839: marked as done (RFS: fossology/3.4.0-2 [ITP])

2019-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2019 06:46:09 + with message-id and subject line RE: Bug#926839: RFS: fossology/3.4.0-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #926839, regarding RFS: fossology/3.4.0-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.