Bug#936086: RFS: vtun/3.0.4-1 [ITA] -- virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks

2019-08-29 Thread Rodrigo Carvalho
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vtun" * Package name: vtun Version : 3.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Maxim Krasnyansky * URL : http://vtun.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs

Re: Removing binary package from source

2019-08-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 03:34:10PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote: > >> Is there a way to uninstall the qt applet when upgrading usbguard? > > Add Breaks on it. > > Mhm, that way libusbguard0 can not be installed unless > usbguard-applet-qt is manually removed, but I guess thats better than to >

Re: Removing binary package from source

2019-08-29 Thread Birger Schacht
Hi, On 8/29/19 2:28 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:04:08PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote: >> This old version will not work with the newer libusbguard0. > Why? Because libusbguard0 doest not provide a stable ABI and the two versions are not backwards compatible. The

Re: Removing binary package from source

2019-08-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:04:08PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote: > This old version will not work with the newer libusbguard0. Why? > Is there a way to uninstall the qt applet when upgrading usbguard? Add Breaks on it. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Removing binary package from source

2019-08-29 Thread Birger Schacht
Hi, usbguard upstream has decided to move the usbguard QT applet from the usbguard sources to a seperate repository (tba). I removed all traces from the QT applet from the usbguard source package, but there is one little problem: when people upgrade to the new usbguard, the QT applet will not be

Re: Help with source only upload

2019-08-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Don't break threads please. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:28:53PM -0500, ElĂ­as Alejandro wrote: > >The command is the same, isn't it? > uhm.. I don't think so. You need to explain why. > I was reading about to source-only > uploads because of[1] however I've uploaded by _mistake_ > with a changes