On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:36 AM Mo Zhou wrote:
> What should be the next steps following our convention?
Since there is nothing using mkl-dnn (according to dak rm), just file
a removal request with `reportbug ftp.debian.org`.
$ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -s unstable -Rn mkl-dnn
Hi mentors,
I maintain a package which is previously named "mkl-dnn"
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mkl-dnn .
Then upstream renamed the source package to "onednn". So I just renamed
the source in d/changelog and d/control then passed the new queue again:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "olive-editor":
* Package name: olive-editor
Version : 20200620-1
Upstream Author : Olive Team
* URL : https://www.olivevideoeditor.org/
* License :
Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:58:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Package is in NEW
has caused the Debian Bug report #972110,
regarding RFS: cbor2/5.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Python implementation of CBOR
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:59:20 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Package is in NEW
has caused the Debian Bug report #972112,
regarding RFS: xmodem/0.4.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- xmodem file transfer protocol
library (Python 3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:09:47 +0200
with message-id <20201015130947.go246...@isildor.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Re: Bug#942884: Bug#971395: RFS: zipios++/2.2.5.0-1 -- small
C++ library for reading zip files (documents)
has caused the Debian Bug report #942884,
regarding RFS:
Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:09:47 +0200
with message-id <20201015130947.go246...@isildor.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Re: Bug#942884: Bug#971395: RFS: zipios++/2.2.5.0-1 -- small
C++ library for reading zip files (documents)
has caused the Debian Bug report #942884,
regarding RFS:
Hi Andreas,
mlt was taken care of.
I spoke with the Debian QA Team and they were reluctant to remove gtkam
because of popcon numbers.
Myon said I should file a Serious bug against the package (#972085).
Options for libexif-gtk seem to be reverting to GTK2 only, or building GTK2
and GTK3
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-10-15 15:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when trying to build paw with gcc / fortran 10 there are some FORTRAN
> errors:
>
>
> ...
> Error: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at
> (2) (COMPLEX(4)/INTEGER(4)).
>
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
when trying to build paw with gcc / fortran 10 there are some FORTRAN
errors:
...
Error: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at (2)
(COMPLEX(4)/INTEGER(4)).
/<>/src/pawlib/comis/code/cs1200.F:138:24:
76 | CALL
10 matches
Mail list logo