I have now updated the lintian pedantic clean source build. It is the
bung_3.0.6-1 files at https://redmine.auroville.org.in/projects/bung/files
Charles
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pt2-clone":
* Package name: pt2-clone
Version : 1.29+ds-1
Upstream Author : Olav "8bitbubsy" Sørensen
* URL : https://16-bits.org/pt.php
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flowblade":
* Package name: flowblade
Version : 2.8.0.3-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/jliljebl/flowblade/issues
* URL : https://github.com/jliljebl/fl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: plore...@disroot.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opentmpfiles":
* Package name: opentmpfiles
Version : 0.3.1-2
Upstream Author : William Hubbs
* URL : https://github.com/Op
Hello!
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 23:09 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2021-04-14 18:39 +, Marius Gripsgard wrote:
>
> > I would really like to avoid a fork, it's not worth doing dual
> > work. Did you ping ofono devs at irc? Also have you sent upstream
> > patches? If a fork is the way you want to go
Hi,
I would really like to avoid a fork, it's not worth doing dual work. Did you
ping ofono devs at irc? Also have you sendt upstream patches? If a fork is the
way you want to go, you will need to rename it as the existing packages need to
follow upstream, we can't just rip an existing package
On 2021-04-14 18:39 +, Marius Gripsgard wrote:
> I would really like to avoid a fork, it's not worth doing dual
> work. Did you ping ofono devs at irc? Also have you sent upstream
> patches? If a fork is the way you want to go, you will need to
> rename it as the existing packages need to fol
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:42 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> I don't think forking ofono is good idea.
I'd like to point out that this isn't ofono that is being forked, but mmsd.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hi!
> In talking to the Debian Developer Mr. Federico Ceratto, since I have
> been unable to get a hold of the Ofono Maintainers, the best course of
> action for packaging mmsd into Debian is to simply fork the project and
> submit my version upstream for packaging in Debian. My repository is
> he
Hello,
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 20:30 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:21:04PM -0400, Chris Talbot wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > In talking to the Debian Developer Mr. Federico Ceratto, since I
> > have
> > been unable to get a hold of the Ofono Maintainers, the best co
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:21:04PM -0400, Chris Talbot wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> In talking to the Debian Developer Mr. Federico Ceratto, since I have
> been unable to get a hold of the Ofono Maintainers, the best course of
> action for packaging mmsd into Debian is to simply fork the project an
Hello All,
In talking to the Debian Developer Mr. Federico Ceratto, since I have
been unable to get a hold of the Ofono Maintainers, the best course of
action for packaging mmsd into Debian is to simply fork the project and
submit my version upstream for packaging in Debian. My repository is
here:
Your message dated Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:48:35 -0300
with message-id <8ec511b2-fde6-2e79-940a-e81f5fcd5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#986314: RFS: gsimplecal/2.1-2 [QA] -- lightweight GUI
calendar application
has caused the Debian Bug report #986314,
regarding RFS: gsimplecal/2.2-1 [QA] --
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch":
* Package name: urlwatch
Version : 2.23-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Perl
* URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/
* License : BSD-3-clause
* V
very true, I hope it's fixed with the recent upload to mentors.d.*,
should appear shortly.
15 matches
Mail list logo
