Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zope.schema":
* Package name: zope.schema
Version : 6.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/zope.s
On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 14:43 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> https://gitlab.com/aroffringa/wsclean
>
> He uses git submodules
These all look like embedded code copies, so I suggest packaging them
separately instead of including them the wsclean source tarball.
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCopy
On 2021-10-18 22:17:27 +0100 (+0100), Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
[...]
> Why is the name a problem? getmail and getmail6 are different
> packages.
[...]
Because users are quite likely to assume that getmail6 is version 6
of the official getmail project, rather than a fork of getmail.
In a community I
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> On 10/18/21 9:19 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 03:21:24PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> > > Same issue in
> > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/lebiniou-data/15982385/log.gz,
> > >
On 10/18/21 9:19 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 03:21:24PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote:
Same issue in
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/lebiniou-data/15982385/log.gz,
it's using lebiniou-3.61.2 when it should be 3.62.1
Can you restart the test ?
I cou
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:25 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:40:48AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:27:51PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > To give a brief history, Debian had "getmail" which was based on
> > > Python
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:40:48AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:27:51PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > To give a brief history, Debian had "getmail" which was based on
> > Python2 and was removed. Then there was a fork available named
> > "getmai
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:27:51PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To give a brief history, Debian had "getmail" which was based on
> Python2 and was removed. Then there was a fork available named
> "getmail6" which was based on Python3. A transitional package linked
> them by #979060.
Hi All,
To give a brief history, Debian had "getmail" which was based on
Python2 and was removed. Then there was a fork available named
"getmail6" which was based on Python3. A transitional package linked
them by #979060.
Now, the upstream of "getmail" has raised a bug in Debian asking
"getmail6"
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 03:21:24PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> Same issue in
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/lebiniou-data/15982385/log.gz,
> it's using lebiniou-3.61.2 when it should be 3.62.1
>
> Can you restart the test ?
I could, but there's no lebiniou 3.62.1 i
Your message dated Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:57:04 +0200
with message-id <2597d8ef-6582-33f9-c89a-65634a27f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: libopendbx/1.4.6-16 [QA] [RC] -- Lightweight database
access abstraction layer
has caused the Debian Bug report #996680,
regarding RFS: libopendbx/1.4.6-16
11 matches
Mail list logo
