On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 15:28 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Other solutions could be creating a file like VERSION with relevant git
> data and add that to the distribution. That file can normally not be
> checked into git, it's a chicken and egg problem. The solution is to add
> the logic to
Seunghun Han writes:
>>> swtpm - Libtpms-based TPM emulator
>>> swtpm-dev - Include files for the TPM emulator's CUSE interface
>>> swtpm-libs - Common libraries for TPM emulators
>>
>> Why do you deviate from the usual libswtpm-dev/libswtpm0 package names?
>> Including the SO version in
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:37:12 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Thank you for your help, Bastian. I just uploaded a new package [1] to
mentors.debian.net. Please check it if there are any other issues.
I have created https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm and granted you
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:32:33 +0200
with message-id <0e93e5bb-8d76-cd42-7015-827320041...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#992312: RFS: ukui-interface/1.0.1-1 -- ukui common
interface
has caused the Debian Bug report #992312,
regarding RFS: ukui-interface/1.0.1-1 -- ukui common
O 22/10/21 ás 12:40, Bastian Germann escribiu:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 00:11:58 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Please have a look at the package repacking history. There are
graphics, sounds, and konami.pcx excluded. You must not reintroduce
them without any good reason (like license change).
On 29.10.21 19:12, Bartek Fabiszewski wrote:
On 29 Oct 2021, at 17:16, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 22:36:51 +0200 Bartek Fabiszewski wrote:
It builds those binary packages:
libmobi0-tools - Tools for handling Mobipocket/Kindle ebook format documents
libmobi0 - C library for
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 22:36:51 +0200 Bartek Fabiszewski wrote:
It builds those binary packages:
libmobi0-tools - Tools for handling Mobipocket/Kindle ebook format documents
libmobi0 - C library for handling Mobipocket/Kindle ebook format documents
libmobi-dev - Development files for libmobi
Hello,
"The actual changelog is: << "\ n \ n \ n", with two entries. The older
one has
never been in Debian, and it doesn't appear to have a special reason to
keep its entry. It'd be good if you could delete it."
The entry of version 2.0.0 was a leftover, I had done it for myself,
On 29/10/2021 07:35, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:02:21PM -0500, Hunter Wittenborn wrote:
The problem is that whenever I (and the other guy) build the program with
something like debuild, the resulting .tar.xz archive doesn't contain the
.git repository in which the 'debian/'
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:08:53 +0200
with message-id <3f4c8298-8e05-1aac-a094-d414b155d...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text
format for writing documentation
has caused the Debian Bug report #971594,
regarding RFS:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:47:44PM +0200, Sebastien CHAVAUX wrote:
> * Package name : ghostwriter
> Version : 2.0.2-1
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> ghostwriter (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
The actual changelog is: <<"\n\n\n", with two entries. The older one has
never been in Debian,
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Thank you for your help, Bastian. I just uploaded a new package [1] to
mentors.debian.net. Please check it if there are any other issues.
Best regards,
Seunghun
[1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:59 AM Bastian Germann wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:02:21PM -0500, Hunter Wittenborn wrote:
> Part of the packaging process for our program includes running Git
> commands to get things like the timestamp for when some files were last
> modified, which are used in things like the building of man pages via
> Asciidoc to
13 matches
Mail list logo
