On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:25:37PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> * Package name: opencpn
>Version : 5.6.0+dfsg1-1
> opencpn (5.6.0+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release
>* Drop upstreamed patches
>* Update standards-version to 4.6.0, no
Hi Tong,
Replying since I am CC'ed, look below :-
On 12/11/21 10:20 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
Thanks, one more thing,
The dbab can upgrade from oldstable (Buster) just fine, but I'm trying
to remove the conffile files no longer exist since then
(dbab_1.3.2-2),
| If the conffile has not been
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:20:31 + Matteo Bini wrote:
dwm (6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
The Debian revision for this NMU has to be -0.1 instead of -1.
The first changelog entry in an NMU has to be "Non-maintainer upload".
Please untag moreinfo when you have
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 11:50 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:07 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > > right?
> > Right.
>
> > > ...
> > > right?
> > Right.
>
> Thanks, one more thing,
>
> The dbab can upgrade from
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:07 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > right?
> Right.
> > ...
> > right?
> Right.
Thanks, one more thing,
The dbab can upgrade from oldstable (Buster) just fine, but I'm trying
to remove the conffile files no
Your message dated Sat, 11 Dec 2021 12:52:16 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.2-1 [ITA] -- dynamic window manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001507,
regarding RFS: dwm/6.2-1 [ITA] -- dynamic window manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
❦ 11 December 2021 10:43 GMT, Matteo Bini:
>* New maintainer
Is there some agreement with the original maintainer?
>* New upstream release.
You can close #978687 and #945281.
--
Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/debian-package-sponsoring
7 matches
Mail list logo
