Re: Automake issues on pngnq

2022-03-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:08:11PM +0100 schrieb Filip Hroch: > > PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro defines set of [lib]png_* variables, > specially [lib]png_CFLAGS and [lib]png_LIBS, which can be used > in Makefile[.am] by this way: > > pngnq_CFLAGS = ... $(png_CFLAGS) .. > pngnq_LDADD = ... $(png_LIBS)

Re: Automake issues on pngnq

2022-03-07 Thread Filip Hroch
Dear Andreas, Andreas Tille writes: ... I was checking this as well - seems here is something broken: # checks for libraries AC_SEARCH_LIBS([zlibVersion],[z]) AC_SEARCH_LIBS([sqrt],[m]) PKG_CHECK_MODULES([PNG], [libpng >= 1.2.0]) PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro defines set of [lib]png_*

Re: Automake issues on pngnq

2022-03-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:07:05AM +0500 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:59:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > For whatever reason automake puts LDFLAGS before "-o pngcomp" > This is correct. > > > instead of after and the last options are obtained from the LIBS

Re: Automake issues on pngnq

2022-03-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:59:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > For whatever reason automake puts LDFLAGS before "-o pngcomp" This is correct. > instead of after and the last options are obtained from the LIBS variable. This is correct. > I have no idea how to tweak this sequence. You don't

Automake issues on pngnq

2022-03-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried to adopt pngnq from QA and pushed it to Salsa[1]. Unfortunately the new upstream version has some automake issues. Strangely enough one issue in configure script occures only in salsa-ci[2] but not in my local pbuilder. There I get another issue in a later stage of the build

Bug#1006832: RFS: minetest/5.5.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt4+dfsg-1 -- Multiplayer infinite-world block sandbox

2022-03-07 Thread Bastian Germann
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 21:59:31 -0500 Travis Wrightsman wrote: Changes since the last upload: minetest (5.5.0+dfsg+~1.9.0mt4+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Add git-buildpackage config file. * Migrate from repack.sh to Files-Excluded. * Refresh patches.

Bug#1006808: RFS: jimtcl/0.79+dfsg0-4 [ITA] -- small-footprint implementation of Tcl - shared library

2022-03-07 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 07.03.22 um 13:17 schrieb vimer: Hi, On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:59:45PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:16:45 +0800 vimer wrote: Changes since the last upload:   jimtcl (0.79+dfsg0-4) unstable; urgency=medium   . * Add myself as maintainer (Closes: #993599). You

Bug#1006808: marked as done (RFS: jimtcl/0.79+dfsg0-4 [ITA] -- small-footprint implementation of Tcl - shared library)

2022-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2022 12:59:45 +0100 with message-id <0a300a68-953a-2f74-62ce-c2c33cdee...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: jimtcl/0.79+dfsg0-4 [ITA] -- small-footprint implementation of Tcl - shared library has caused the Debian Bug report #1006808, regarding RFS: